I sympathize with this. And I understand the criticism that this kind of sympathy could be soy as well.
And constant bitchy sniping and nit picking isn't about as feminine as it gets?
There's got to be something different about us trying to find common ground and the globohomo religous elites, and masses that follow them, "finding common ground".
That's the sort of conversations the Freemasons probably had around the time of the French Revolution. Yeah, that revolution, the one aimed at taking down Christendom. The one that occurred in Catholic France. The one whose victors birthed globohomo, the universal brotherhood of man, liberal secular societies, progress, and all those good things.
I cringe every time I see these religious elites like the Pope and/or Ecumenical Patriarch and/or whatever fruity Anglican/Lutheran/Protestant bishop they've found embrace eachother because I know their intent is towards "world peace" and all the current values of liberal modernity. It's very obvious at this point. Either intentionally or unintentionally, they are building Babylon and feeding into ideologies that are ushering in the beast system.
Ecumenism in itself isn't bad, it's what's motivating it that can be evil. If a Woke hierarchy gather to discuss common ground and advance a worldly agenda and not the Kingdom of God, then it's evil. Fr
om the earliest days of Christianity the devil has been at work creating divisions, looking for points of agreement (common ground) and working together to combat what we can all agree on as evil is advancing the Kingdom of God.
Personally, I do respect the Pope as a father figure for the West. But I also think he spiritually encapsulates the current state of the West. So yeah, that makes me highly critical, angers me, and I shouldn't get into that to avoid offending and derailing what I'm trying to get at.
I would argue the principle of a Pope, a patriarch, is Christian as it reflects the hierarchy of heaven, but I'm not going to spend precious time defending that position. And I understand fully that our leaders are not necessarily good men. Popes of the past have been downright wicked, but the Catholic Church is roomy and good, righteous men are ever present, keeping the faith and furthering the Kingdom. Hierarchy and obedience is a whole other discussion though.
What I see here on this forum is at least people are earnest in their pursuit of Christ. We aren't trying to rehash the old trope that "all religions are the same" blah blah blah stuff. The foot goes down on things like the hindus, who simply worship demons, or the jews and muslims who call their diety "God" but, in fact, is worse than a demon and is the spirit of the anti-Christ himself (jews in particular on this one).
We also have a number of larpers, who get their identity (and some their livelihood) from their affiliation with a demonination. They're the worst ones for nut picking and sniping. But sure, there are many here who earnestly seek a relationship with the one true God.
Maybe that can be a difference between us trying to find common ground and what the globohomos do. Christians here on this forum are always attempting to center on Christ, no matter the cost, at least from what I can see. I respect that despite disagreements that I'll never work out with fellow Christians here.
I answered that in my previous comment.
In regard to the nominal Christian larpers, well many of us do that in the beginning of our Christian walk. It's fake it to make it. But somewhere along the way that showy pride has to give way to a more discreet Christianity, one that the Father in Heaven sees, but nobody else. Without humility, or the seeking of humility, we're all just nominals.
www.gbnews.com
www.catholicnewsagency.com
