I don't know how he consistently denies our points, which are self evident, especially in our, more thoughtful, corner of the internet.As I already mentioned the currency does matter not only the real economy. The proof of this is that every economy with a very weak currency also has a weak economy. The two go hand in hand. The Argentinian economy is weak, the Venezuelan economy is weak, the Turkish economy is weak, etc. A weak currency and a weak economy go hand in hand. Even in the U.S.A. the real GDP growth rate long-term trend line has been decelerating for decades.
A basic reading of Richard Cantillon, Murray Rothbard, Frederich Hayek, Ludwig Von Mises, Carl Menger, Milton Friedman, Henry George, etc will provide ample evidence that the currency does matter. You act as if it works like a corporation doing a stock split. If Apple shares are a thousand dollars and then you do a 10 for 1 stock split all the shareholders are in the same position as before. With currency it does not work that way. Firstly debt holders and savers (in cash) get stiffed and there is also the Cantillon effect causing certain individuals to get even richer. Inflation distorts the structure of the economy in a million different ways.
“There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”
― John Maynard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace
As Ben Werkman put out recently, however, it's something Michael Saylor made his first in the "21 rules of Bitcoin"
1. Those who understand bitcoin, buy bitcoin. Those who don't, criticize bitcoin.