Anti-ICE Riots Thread

Thomas More said:
They need to pen them in, and arrest every single one in the area, then press maximum charges for maximum sentences.
Click to expand...
Or they could tell the truth and say it’s an organized army of foreign nationals making war against the USA, being aided and abetted by domestic enemies, and kill them all like we were in, you know, a war. Isn’t this Hegseth the “Secretary of War?” Didn’t he just rename his position to that? So what is he doing intervening in all this if there isn’t a war? This is how losers wage war. Lol with paintballs, because they are afraid of some judge and an SPLC lawyer.
 
The Penitent Man said:
Or they could tell the truth and say it’s an organized army of foreign nationals making war against the USA, being aided and abetted by domestic enemies, and kill them all like we were in, you know, a war. Isn’t this Hegseth the “Secretary of War?” Didn’t he just rename his position to that? So what is he doing intervening in all this if there isn’t a war? This is how losers wage war. Lol with paintballs, because they are afraid of some judge and an SPLC lawyer.
Click to expand...
I'm in favor of this, but I think it's probably not politically viable. I think mass arrest of protestors for blocking roads or interfering with police duties could become doable with just a small shift in the Overton window. The Overton window has already shifted a lot in this area, and actually enforcing law and order is no longer unthinkable as it has seemed to be in recent years.
 
Thomas More said:
probably not politically viable.
Click to expand...
This just means letting your opponents dictate what actions you can take and is an indefinite barrier to action. It is self limiting behavior not based on reality, but fear: “I’m afraid that someone might tell me no or try and stop me if I do X.” Our enemies are bolder than we, and this is just one of the reasons they make progress while we lose ground. What’s that SAS motto, “He Who Dares, Wins”? I don’t think it was “He Who Does What is Politically Viable Wins.”

Progress here comes in seizing opportunities and taking territory, so to speak, FIGHTING FOR IT, when the opportunity arises. This administration has already had so many of these in the past nine months, and has failed to take any meaningful action each and every time. It isn’t “politically viable” because Republicans have made it so, by saying such at each juncture. People that utter this phrase have made it a self-fulfilling prophecy. They had such an opportunity just two weeks ago. Wasted.

Rahm Emmanuel is shaking his head and smiling to himself.
 
The Penitent Man said:
This just means letting your opponents dictate what actions you can take and is an indefinite barrier to action. It is self limiting behavior not based on reality, but fear: “I’m afraid that someone might tell me no or try and stop me if I do X.” Our enemies are bolder than we, and this is just one of the reasons they make progress while we lose ground. What’s that SAS motto, “He Who Dares, Wins”? I don’t think it was “He Who Does What is Politically Viable Wins.”

Progress here comes in seizing opportunities and taking territory, so to speak, FIGHTING FOR IT, when the opportunity arises. This administration has already had so many of these in the past nine months, and has failed to take any meaningful action each and every time. It isn’t “politically viable” because Republicans have made it so, by saying such at each juncture. People that utter this phrase have made it a self-fulfilling prophecy. They had such an opportunity just two weeks ago. Wasted.

Rahm Emmanuel is shaking his head and smiling to himself.
Click to expand...

The only problem with this is, if this were legal, to declare a good chunk of your populate as foreign terrorist, or domestic terrorist, as soon as the opposition takes power, they would surely try to declare maga / heritage America as domestic terrorist and live all of us up to a guillotine.

Honestly it looked like Biden’s handlers were ready to try this just a few years ago

IMG_6829.jpeg

For whatever reason, it didn’t happen,(the hot war against the right)

I would suggest an alternative.

Our society has already been subverted by jews, and just last week Israel bought TikTok to try to keep control of the narrative that israel / jews = good and everyone criticizing jew = anti semite.

This is how you win in today’s battlefield. jews did exactly this to turn heritage America into faggots,

We need to fight this war with the appropriate channels and use the right weapons . Basically if organizations like turning point weren’t already subverted by jews, we need more of them. But without the jewry
 
The Penitent Man said:
This just means letting your opponents dictate what actions you can take and is an indefinite barrier to action. It is self limiting behavior not based on reality, but fear: “I’m afraid that someone might tell me no or try and stop me if I do X.” Our enemies are bolder than we, and this is just one of the reasons they make progress while we lose ground. What’s that SAS motto, “He Who Dares, Wins”? I don’t think it was “He Who Does What is Politically Viable Wins.”

Progress here comes in seizing opportunities and taking territory, so to speak, FIGHTING FOR IT, when the opportunity arises. This administration has already had so many of these in the past nine months, and has failed to take any meaningful action each and every time. It isn’t “politically viable” because Republicans have made it so, by saying such at each juncture. People that utter this phrase have made it a self-fulfilling prophecy. They had such an opportunity just two weeks ago. Wasted.

Rahm Emmanuel is shaking his head and smiling to himself.
Click to expand...
Some things really aren't viable, even though they are obviously best from our point of view. Removing women's right to vote is an example. This would fix most of society's problems, and isn't going to happen short of a massive collapse.

I think that a based, Christian government will be willing to mow down leftist protestors around the same time that it becomes possible to reform the voting franchise.

It doesn't matter if that is me allowing my opponents to dictate to me. These are massive societal changes which do not have a political faction with enough support to make them a reality.
 
Thomas More said:
Some things really aren't viable, even though they are obviously best from our point of view. Removing women's right to vote is an example. This would fix most of society's problems, and isn't going to happen short of a massive collapse.

I think that a based, Christian government will be willing to mow down leftist protestors around the same time that it becomes possible to reform the voting franchise.

It doesn't matter if that is me allowing my opponents to dictate to me. These are massive societal changes which do not have a political faction with enough support to make them a reality.
Click to expand...
I agree that a merciless government mowing down its sworn enemies with a squadron of Apaches would be the best solution. And I don’t want to say I wouldn’t support that if it happened, because I would. However, that’s a bit more extreme than what I’m suggesting, because I am reasonable, thoughtful, and considerate.

I would simply suggest not painting people who are proposing to kill federal agents with paintball guns. That’s a pretty gay way of responding. I would suggest making an example of the most egregious violations, and setting a precedent. How about that for starters? Can we agree that is something the federal government can do? Do we always have to imagine and dwell on what we can’t do? Be optimistic.

And of course getting rid of the female vote is impossible, because that requires a political solution. What I’m suggesting is that someone already in a political office give an order. Or ignore one. Prosecute someone, or refuse to prosecute someone. Otherwise what is the purpose of their being there? And if the people in office that were put there through the political process will not do their job, then what good is the political process?
 
Thomas More said:
Some things really aren't viable, even though they are obviously best from our point of view. Removing women's right to vote is an example. This would fix most of society's problems, and isn't going to happen short of a massive collapse.

I think that a based, Christian government will be willing to mow down leftist protestors around the same time that it becomes possible to reform the voting franchise.

It doesn't matter if that is me allowing my opponents to dictate to me. These are massive societal changes which do not have a political faction with enough support to make them a reality.
Click to expand...
And also, let’s not use the word “protestors” while we have a Republican in office. I’ve always hated that word. I like the words “insurgents, saboteurs, foreign agents, vandals, insurrectionists, agent provocateurs, disrupters.” They can become protesters again once a Democrat is back in office.
 
ICE has become the symbolic tip of the spear of the Trump Administration 2.0, and as such every single leftist with a save a hoe mentality harbours deep resentment+ violent fantasies against that department.

There cannot be daily videos of ICE getting harrassed and obstructed, whether that be physically by Antifa/immigrants or figuratively by Democrat jurisdictions. According to DHS instances of violence against ICE agents has increased by 1000 percent. Imagine if one of the detainees or Antifa dies at the hands of ICE during these raid/protests. It's a powder keg waiting to explode, Trump needs to act before things get out of hand.













 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top