60th Anniversary of The Assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy

I'll just put this out here, even as a Canadian Gen-Xer, I sometimes think that if I had the power of time travel, I would have gone back and prevented the assassinations of Jack and Bobby...just to see how the world would have been if they both survived. It's crazy how popular JFK was during his term...I've been to many countries around the world who named streets, etc., after him. My Canadian mother was 11 when he was killed, and her small-town school was sent home after the news broke. I'm not really big into American politics, only insofar as it affects me as a Canadian, but of the 20th-Century American statesmen, I've always admired and respected JFK and Teddy Roosevelt, despite whatever faults that they may have had.
 
Plenty of good information on the jewish violent takeover when America finally had a Catholic in the presidency who would have overthrown the fed. Very little information on here yet about the financial war between the Kennedy's and the Rothschilds. Always follow the money. His issues with the nuclear energy of Israel were only second in line to his criminal offense of attempting to free the American people from a debt-based currency.

"We are at war and the enemy is advancing around the world - John F. Kennedy speech April 27th 1961"

Speech starts around 4:40, but the introduction is informative too.
He starts talking about how Marx was grifting people in New York in the 1850s as an obscure journalist.
The crowd enjoys his succinct humor, don't remember the last time I heard an American president making his audience genuinely laugh.
At 14:19 he begins his speech on the jew world order.

The line that always stood out to me was "It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match." He is admitting here that there is some kind of immense "conspiracy" meaning (hidden by the few against the many) in terms of east and west cooperation.

Whoever did the Jersey jewish accent for the voiceover of the Rothschild is a bit heavy-handed, I would picture something softer, but more sinister.

Here is the pdf to Michael Collins Piper's book, "Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy"
https://archive.org/details/finaljudgmentmis0000pipe

Here is the crux of the assassination issue which is why it was carried out sooner and more sloppily (they had to do an entire cognitive psyop on the American public to cover their dirty tracks):

"Executive Order 11110: Debt-Free Silver Certificates"


And what happened to this currency Kennedy created with Executive Order 11110 immediately after his assassination? It was all revoked and bought back up the day after he was killed in Dallas. The very first acts of LBJ as payback to those behind the assassination was to revoke the money that JFK had created.

Here is a lengthy bit of background on this:

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed by President John Fitzgerald Kennedy with the intention to strip the... Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. This matter has been exhaustively researched by the Christian Common Law Institute through the Federal Register and Library of Congress, and the Institute has concluded that President Kennedy's Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superseded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

When John Fitzgerald Kennedy, author of Profiles in Courage, signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically to the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -- money -- without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury" [the full text is displayed below]. This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held therein. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. Although $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated, they were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated.

Certainly it's obvious that President Kennedy knew that the Federal Reserve Notes being circulated as "legal currency" were contrary to the Constitution of the United States, which calls for issuance of "United States Notes" as interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. Comparing a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States (i.e., the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury (as issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order), the two almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note". In addition, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number. Following President Kennedy's assassination on November 22, 1963, the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation, and Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the "legal currency" of the nation.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a simple matter of economics. USNs were backed by silver and FRNs were (still are) backed by nothing of intrinsic value. As a result of Executive Order 11110, the national debt would have been prevented from reaching its current level (almost all of the $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963). Executive Order 11110 also granted the U.S. Government the power to repay past debt without further borrowing from the privately owned Federal Reserve which charged both principle and interest on all new "money" it "created." Finally, Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to create its own money backed by silver, again giving money real value.

Perhaps President Kennedy's assassination was a warning to future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. For, with true courage, JFK had boldly challenged the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt: 1) war (i.e., the Vietnam war); and, 2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.

Executive Order 11110, the AMENDMENT of EXECUTIVE ORDER No. 10289, as amended RELATING to the PERFORMANCE of CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING the DEPARTMENT of the TREASURY:

By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of Title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.
SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
JOHN F. KENNEDY
THE WHITE HOUSE,
June 4, 1963

As said, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998: Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by:

EO 10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725;
EO 10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869;
EO 11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605;
EO 11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003;
EO 12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617

The 1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy's 1963 amendment, did not change or alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search of Clinton's 1998 and 1999 EO's and Presidential Directives has shown no reference to any alterations, suspensions, or changes to EO 11110.

The Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System, is a Private Corporation. Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as: "Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves." privately owned banks own the stock of the FED. This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said: "Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock holding commercial banks elect two-thirds of each Bank's nine member board of directors." In short, Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks.

Also, according to Black's Law Dictionary, these privately owned banks are "allowed" to issue money: "The Federal Reserve Act, created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising banks as administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.)." Thus the privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks are allowed to actually issue (create) the "money" we use.

In 1964, the House Committee on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is: "The Federal Reserve is a total moneymaking machine. It can issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving to print them." Any one person or any closely knit group that has a lot of money has a lot of power. Imagine a group of people with the power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have. This is exactly what the privately owned FED is!

No man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. In describing the FED, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:

Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.

Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions, departments, or agencies. They are private credit monopolies, which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully placed upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions.

The FED basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the FED banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it's interesting to note that the Federal Reserve Act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power of the FED over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, support it. On the other hand, there are those like President John F. Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His efforts were lauded about in Jim Marrs' 1990 book Crossfire:

Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.

Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks."

In a speech made to Columbia University on Nov. 12, 1963, ten days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy said: "The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight." In this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be the subject of his own book... a true Profile in Courage.

By giving the U.S. Treasury the Constitutional authority to coin U.S. money once again, EO 11110 would thus prevent the national debt from rising due to "usury" that the American people are charged for "borrowing" (i.e., using) FRN's. Kennedy knew that, if Congress coined and regulated money, as the Constitution states, the national debt would be reduced by not paying interest to the 12 credit monopolies. This in itself would have allowed the American people freedom to freely use all the money they have earned, enabling the economy to grow. Now, Executive Order 11110 is still in effect, even though no U.S. President has had the courage to follow it.



One thing I would add to this is that most US coins (10 cents, 25 cents, 50 cents, and the 1 dollar coin) were made out of SILVER until 1964.
About a year and half after Kennedy was killed, in 1965 they changed the composition of all US coins to much cheaper metals.
If you ever get (as change in a store) a pre-1965 US coin, save it, as it's real silver, and worth much more than the nominal value of the coin itself..

See here:

 
Last edited:
One thing I would add to this is that most US coins (10 cents, 25 cents, 50 cents, and the 1 dollar coin) were made out of SILVER until 1964.
About a year and half after Kennedy was killed, in 1965 they changed the composition of all US coins to much cheaper metals.
If you ever get (as change in a store) a pre-1965 US coin, save it, as it's real silver.

See here:

Yes, I learned about this many years ago. In Canada, those same denomination coins were also made of silver up until and including 1968.
 
The truth is, the person who murdered Kennedy, Lee Harvey Oswald probably worked for the KGB and was a fully-pledged spy for the Soviet-Russians.
Oswald lived in Russia (Soviet Union at the time) between 1959 and 1962. He even met his wife (Marina Prusakova) there.
(Kennedy worked with the Soviet Russia and made more allowances to them than any other US president before and after him. Yet, the Russians still got him killed. You cannot reason with Russians - the only language they understand is that of violence. They are not your equal. Kennedy made a mistake by treating them as such. They need to fear you otherwise they will try to destroy you. Reagan did not treat Russian leaders as his equals - and he won the Cold War.)
I am shocked how few people seem to consider this, despite Oswald's links to the Soviet Union were well-known.

PS Instead of down-votes, If you think someone is wrong why don't you put down a valid argument backed up with evidence?
 
Last edited:
The truth is, the person who murdered Kennedy, Lee Harvey Oswald probably worked for the KGB and was a fully-pledged spy for the Soviet-Russians.
Oswald lived in Russia (Soviet Union at the time) between 1959 and 1962. He met his wife (Marina Prusakova) there.
Kennedy worked with the Soviet Russia and made more allowances to them than nay other US president before and after him. Yet, the Russians still got him killed. You cannot reason with Russians - the only language they understand is that of violence. They are not your equal. Kennedy made a mistake by treating them as such. They need to fear otherwise they will to destroy you.


So...being fully temporarily banned last week in another thread for your silly anti Russian trolling wasn't enough ?
Are you aiming for a double ban now ?

take-the-bait-gif.gif
 
So...being fully temporarily banned last week in another thread for your silly anti Russian trolling wasn't enough ?
Are you aiming for a double ban now ?

take-the-bait-gif.gif
FIY, my message to Samseau last weekend that got me unbanned:

Dear Samseau,
I understand "Cynlo" got me banned from the forum.
I am not that upset - but a bit sad perhaps. Christisking had the potential to be a decent Christian forum.
He labelled me a troll, which I am not. The real (Russian) trolls such as "Jaguarcat" and others are now openly spreading lies, virtually unchallenged. I did not post anything that wasn't factual, backed up by reliable evidence. I am sure, none of the people who disagreed with me were able to dispute what i said with any factual evidence while I always backed up my comments with reliable sources. Instead of meaningful discussion on important topics, I was met with childish insults and mockery as well as vile comments which are contrary to the Christian faith.
If it wasn't clear: I grew up in central Europe (you would call it Eastern Europe) but I am a British citizen now.
The Russians caused enormous suffering to peoples in that part of Europe.
My grand-grandfather was sent to the Gulag (he came back alive, his cousin didn't). (He was never involved in politic- he was a mailman, his cousin was a tailor).
From the tzarist ear Russia through the Leninist-stalinist Soviet Union to the current putinist Russia - it has barely changed. It is still the biggest threat to the civilized, Western world. Many readers here, whoa re presumably American, would not understand this.
I am nearly 42. I clearly remember the collapse of the Soviet Union. We never thought the Russian would be a threat to the world again but apparently they are again now.
The increasing Russian influence fills people like me with considerable concern.
No, this is not against Eastern Orthodoxy there are no problems with Georgian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Macedonian, Bulgarian, Ukrainian etc churches - as they are perfectly compatible with the Western World. The "Russian orthodox Church" is the only cockoo's egg in the next. It is a political tool to facilitate Russian expansion. In the West, they seem to focus on the "dispossessed" youth to lead them astray. Have you noticed there are more "converts" in the ROCOR churches than in any other congregation? Alarm bells should be ringing. And this is not a criticism aimed at genuine converts- it is aimed at the Russians and their government. I think you get my point.
Considering that "Cynlo" and others here tried to make a mockery of my comments and my ban - not sure if I would actually want to comment here any longer.
However, perhaps you understand what my position was from the beginning. You may share this message with other moderators and with commenter themselves, if you wish.
Yours truly:
Cognitive Dissonance 73
 
Last edited:
At some Oswald even considered applying for citizenship of the Soviet Union and not returning to the US. (This was widely publicized in US newspapers at the time) However, the KGB had other plans for him.


Oswald was not only let back into the USA after 3 years living in Minsk, but the US State Department lent him the money to come back and allowed his Russian wife and daughter to come with him. All very special treatment which no other real defector got. He was not arrested, or even fined, and suffered no negative consequences.

All the evidence, and i mean ALL of it points to him being a US intelligence agent sent on a mission to the Soviet Union as a fake defector..
His real (secret) purpose in Russia was to find another former US agent turned traitor and mole.
Once back in the USA he was instructed to infiltrate and monitor communist Cuban groups.

Most of Oswald's income tax records which would help prove who was paying him all that extra cash up until the day he died are still confidential after 60 years.

The 2 hour documentary "Killing Oswald" made by "E2" films from the year 2013 explains all this very well.

 
Last edited:
Oswald was not only let back into the USA after 3 years living in Minsk, but the US State Department lent him the money to come back and allowed his Russian wife and daughter to come with him. All very special treatment which no other real defector got. He was not arrested, or even fined, and suffered no negative consequences.

All the evidence, and i mean ALL of it points to him being a US intelligence agent sent on a mission in the Soviet Union as a fake defector..
His real (secret) purpose in Russia was to find another former US agent turned traitor and mole.
Once back in the USA he was instructed to infiltrate communist Cuban groups.

Most of tax records which would help prove who was paying him all that extra cash up until the day he died are still confidential after 60 years.
Oswald might have become a double-agent, trying to play both sides. However, he killed Kennedy and not Khrushchev, so the point still stands - he worked for the KGB.
 
Maybe I should post shorter explanations. Kennedy was ultimately killed because of Executive Order 11110 primarily, and secondarily because of his not kowtowing to the jews of fake Israel. Whether it was Oswald (unlikely) or multiple shooters at the end of the day doesn't really matter, what matters is that not even the president of America can save the American people from their unintentional indentured servitude without risking open war with the banks. Perhaps a former special forces who could become President could give them a longer fight, long enough to show the people the whole jig. That won't happen now because just getting into the office is an entire joke of a rigged process.

Every president since JFK has either been in on the con or knows what happens if they start circulating debt-free currency.
 
FIY, my message to Samseau last weekend that got me unbanned:

Dear Samseau,
I understand "Cynlo" got me banned from the forum.
I am not that upset - but a bit sad perhaps. Christisking had the potential to be a decent Christian forum.
He labelled me a troll, which I am not. The real (Russian) trolls such as "Jaguarcat" and others are now openly spreading lies, virtually unchallenged. I did not post anything that wasn't factual, backed up by reliable evidence. I am sure, none of the people who disagreed with me were able to dispute what i said with any factual evidence while I always backed up my comments with reliable sources. Instead of meaningful discussion on important topics, I was met with childish insults and mockery as well as vile comments which are contrary to the Christian faith.
If it wasn't clear: I grew up in central Europe (you would call it Eastern Europe) but I am a British citizen now.
The Russians caused enormous suffering to peoples in that part of Europe.
My grand-grandfather was sent to the Gulag (he came back alive, his cousin didn't). (He was never involved in politic- he was a mailman, his cousin was a tailor).
From the tzarist ear Russia through the Leninist-stalinist Soviet Union to the current putinist Russia - it has barely changed. It is still the biggest threat to the civilized, Western world. Many readers here, whoa re presumably American, would not understand this.
I am nearly 42. I clearly remember the collapse of the Soviet Union. We never thought the Russian would be a threat to the world again but apparently they are again now.
The increasing Russian influence fills people like me with considerable concern.
No, this is not against Eastern Orthodoxy there are no problems with Georgian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Macedonian, Bulgarian, Ukrainian etc churches - as they are perfectly compatible with the Western World. The "Russian orthodox Church" is the only cockoo's egg in the next. It is a political tool to facilitate Russian expansion. In the West, they seem to focus on the "dispossessed" youth to lead them astray. Have you noticed there are more "converts" in the ROCOR churches than in any other congregation? Alarm bells should be ringing. And this is not a criticism aimed at genuine converts- it is aimed at the Russians and their government. I think you get my point.
Considering that "Cynlo" and others here tried to make a mockery of my comments and my ban - not sure if I would actually want to comment here any longer.
However, perhaps you understand what my position was from the beginning. You may share this message with other moderators and with commenter themselves, if you wish.
Yours truly:
Cognitive Dissonance 73
It wasnt “Russia” that caused enormous suffering during the 20th century but rather the “USSR”. Russia just happened to have been the container the (((communist))) virus was first cultured and grown in. The Jewish revolutionaries manufactured that artificial ideology in order to wrest power from the Tsar for themselves. Once it “worked“ there it was proof of concept and that became the pretext for the metastasis that caused all the death, destruction and sorrow. The Russia of today has little in common with the beast that was the USSR and as far as i can tell has no global designs beyond self preservation via regional influence.

I dont think youre a troll. I do think you’re misinformed and don’t understand recent history beyond the mainstream propaganda layer
 
It wasnt “Russia” that caused enormous suffering during the 20th century but rather the “USSR”. Russia just happened to have been the container the (((communist))) virus was first cultured and grown in. The Jewish revolutionaries manufactured that artificial ideology in order to wrest power from the Tsar for themselves. Once it “worked“ there it was proof of concept and that became the pretext for the metastasis that caused all the death, destruction and sorrow. The Russia of today has little in common with the beast that was the USSR and as far as i can tell has no global designs beyond self preservation via regional influence.

I dont think youre a troll. I do think you’re misinformed and don’t understand recent history beyond the mainstream propaganda layer
Agree 1000%. For example, the Jewish-led Soviet army committed horrible atrocities during World War Two, most notably against the Poles and the Germans. I am always careful to refer to them as such when I talk about this because there was a huge difference between the Communist Jews and the Russian people. The Communists hated the Russian people and did everything in their power to destroy them.
 
The JFK assassination actually started me on the road for the truth. I happened upon Mark Lane's book "Rush to Judgment" in my early teens. He was a lawyer who had been hired by the Oswald family and the book tore the official explanation of the event to shreds. Even as a twelve year old, I realized that this had basically been a coup, that none of the real perpetrators had been brought to justice and most were most likely still in power. Oliver Stone's film was also good and for the longest time, I agreed with his theory that it was the military/industrial complex that killed Kennedy. I know believe it was Israel, and this was the point where they really took full control of the US and ultimately over the entire West through their American golem.
 
The JFK assassination actually started me on the road for the truth. I happened upon Mark Lane's book "Rush to Judgment" in my early teens. He was a lawyer who had been hired by the Oswald family and the book tore the official explanation of the event to shreds.

Did you know Mark Lane also made a documentary movie at the same time interviewing many key witlessness on camera ?
It was released in 1967 and was the FIRST serious movie ever to present the case for a conspiracy.
At the same time the movie was released, district attorney of New Orleans Jim Garrison started his case against Claw Shaw.
Shortly after that, some of the witnesses interviewed in the movie died under mysterious circumstances, or never made public statements ever again.

You can watch Mark Lane's 1967 movie here:

 
Last edited:
Did you know Mark Lane also made a documentary movie at the same time interviewing many key witlessness on camera ?
It was released in 1967 and was the FIRST serious movie ever to present the case for a conspiracy.
At the same time the movie was released, district attorney of New Orleans Jim Garrison started his case against Claw Shaw.
Shortly after that, some of the witnesses interviewed in the movie died under mysterious circumstances, or never made public statements ever again.

You can watch Mark Lane's 1967 movie here:


I did not know about that movie! Thanks so much, I'll check it out. ☺. I did know about Garrison/Clay Shaw, through the Oliver Stone movie. (Garrison even has a cameo in it playing Earl Warren.). Stone's movie also goes into how the witnesses were dealt with. Well, I guess I can say if it wasn't for Mark Lane, my life would have been much different and I might not have even ended up here exchanging these posts with you.
 
Last edited:
Lee Harvey Oswald beng shot by Jack Ruby (((Rubensteien))) on live television in the basement of the Dallas police station.
Oswald at the time was being transferred to another jail.
This happened only 2 days after Kennedy was killed, and before any official evidence could be presented to a lawyer or judge.
In those 2 days he was in custody, Oswald never was able to get a lawyer or any legal representation, despite asking several times for one.
Once dead there would be no trial, and the entire shooting was later blamed only on him.






Slow motion, different angle:




Angle comparison:

 
Back
Top