'' Its better to have 40% backstabbers than 40% migrant population because as long as the country is ethnically the same it can recover in a few generations.
Do you want whites to have ethnically homogenous countries yes or no. ''
Yes or no ? it is a simple question Do you want whites to have ethnically homogenous countries
The answer was literally in the words you quoted, which you did not bother to read:
Ethnically homogenous countries are nice, but are just the icing on the cake and a by-product of a faithful, intelligent, and loyal people. The latter part is the important part, the ethnic homogeneity is just a side effect.
If English isn't your first language, just say so and I'll make simpler sentences for you. But please stop making low-quality posts.
Read and reply in good faith. If you aren't even going to read the words people put on the screen, then why post?
On the issue of "40% of whites are backstabbers, bad people, etc" as posited by some posters here...
This is not an inherent "feature" of white people. This is a symptom of a system that has been hijacked and turned against us. These people you mention, have been propagandized to since birth to hate themselves, and hate other white people. Their parents were either too weak, unaware, or were corrupted themselves by an older version of propaganda, to do anything about it.
There have been white societies, where the average person was of a higher quality. Most people simply end up taking the shape of the container they're put in. These same people, the liberal white women, the soy men, etc... If they grew up in an environment that fostered morals and traditions instead of actively encouraging their destruction, most of them would not have turned out the way that they did.
My point is, I don't think it's fair to use the people that have been lobotomized by this system as an example of why whites don't deserve a homeland, that they actually have dominion over.
This is actually completely false and easily contradicted by history. Moreover, you completely ignore the agency of Whites. How can Whites be this advanced race if they aren't capable of making their own choices?
While certainly, brainwashing can explain why many Whites do stupid things, at some point it is OBVIOUS when a lie is a lie, and at that point it is the fault of the person for not recognizing it.
How is it that all of those 40% of Whites cannot see the lies of society, yet guys on here can? Stop making excuses for the sinners, at some point the fault becomes their own. That is how God will judge us and excuse making cannot save anyone. Do not blame others on Judgement Day, it doesn't work that way because we all know that's a lie. Your actions are your own and Whites have no one to blame but themselves.
As for the nature of Whites being treacherous, disagreeable people, you don't need to be a professional historian to figure this one out. Look at a map of Europe:
The most politically divided landmass in the world. None of these lines actually exist except in the minds of the Whites who made them, which occurred over thousands of years after the collapse of the Roman Empire. There are more countries per sq meter than anywhere else in the world strictly because of the tendency of Whites to betray, rebel, and kill one another for power.
China, even during it's most divided times, had, what, 8 kingdoms? Africa, the entire continent which is 4x the size of Europe, only has 54 countries to Europe's 44. Asia, which is 10x the size of Europe, only has 49 countries.
The extreme political division within Europe is exactly what you'd expect from a race that suffers from pride issues, as treachery, rebellion, and grudges are defining features of pride. This is why wars are so common in European history, and why political divisions in Europe rarely heal.
It is interesting how people refuse to self-reflect on themselves, their people, or their culture. Whites who deny their own nature are no different than Blacks who say they aren't violent.