Young People Converting to Islam

Religion of peace; Quran burner shot and killed:



Iraqis showing the world not only do they now allow marriage of 9 year olds but also support killing a man for burning a goddamn BOOK that you can buy for $10.

Anyways he is dead, remember Islamophobia isn’t a fear of Islam nor is it irrational, it’s a hatred of the devil and the impending threat that dark age barbaric Arab tribal gnostic cult has on the rest of the world.

A Jewish guy claiming to be Momika's friend is now saying they will burn the Qu'ran in Manchester.



 
I've recently learned that the claim of Islamic Countries being more advanced than Christian ones is a complete and total lie.

Because those middle eastern countries were more advanced than the western countries in some cases yes, but only when they were still mostly Christian.

When invaded in the 7th and 8th centuries by the Arab Conquests, some of them had 80% Christian populations with only 20% being Muslim.

634–638 CE
The Rashidun Caliphate annexed the Levant
636
The Muslim armies conquered Syria, Palestine, and Lebanon after the Battle of Yarmouk
637
The Muslim army defeated the Sassanid Empire in Iraq at the Battle of Qadasiya
711
The Umayyads conquered Hispania, establishing Islam's first foothold in continental Europe

The Middle East only became majority Muslim in the 12th Century, and the end of their scientific Golden Age is considered between the 14th Century and 16th Century. Notably, there are still Christians today in nearly all Middle East countries invaded in the 8th Century Conquests, with for example Egypt still have a large population.
Hold on, there's like two dozen more countries than this, including Christian Egypt, the three Nubian Kingdoms of Sudan, Somalia, Christian Libya, Christian Armenia, Christian Sicily, parts of Christian Russia and Christian Ukraine, Persia which had some Christians, and some raiders even reached deep into France of all places and threatened to conquer France before being beaten back.

Christian Pakistan, Christian Maghreb.

All of the ones mentioned in the original post were Christian. Christian Levant, Christian Palestine, Christian Lebanon, Christian Iraq, Christian Hispania which was reduced to nothing but 200 monks in the mountains who then spent nearly 800 years, starting from 720 and ending in 1492 when they expelled all of the Jews who didn't convert to Christian, because they opened the Gates of Toledo letting the Muslims conquer the whole country in the first place.
 
I had a conversation with a Muslim who while strongly outspoken, was respectably honest and faithful in my eyes.

But with what the Pakistanis have done in Rotherham I can't call a Muslim a follower of Christ even as an olive branch.

For to hate your brother in Christ puts you in danger of hell.

So imagine my surprise when a white genocide supporting member of the Synagogue of Satan jumps in.



We shouldn't let Muslims conquer us, obviously.

But without Jews opening the Gates of Toledo, they can't.

They aren't capable of conquering Christian nations without immigration, and that immigration only exists because of Jews.
 
They aren't capable of conquering Christian nations without immigration, and that immigration only exists because of Jews.
Christians and Whites can easily be pitted against each other. This tactic was already used by Muslims against the Byzantine Empire after the 4th Crusade and eventually led to the fall of the empire and loss of Constantinople.

It started way back then with the Schism and now things, like feminism, LGBT ideology etc., are just other topics of debate that lead to severe a divide within Christian and White society.

If I had to predict another schism, it would be between (primarily) white Christians and atheists in western Europe. Atheists would also include those who are Christians on paper, but support progressive ideologies. It's obvious that these two groups aren't compatible. The latter makes up roughly 60-80% of the western European population.

But we could easily be one or two centuries away from that happening.
 
As long as Christianity keeps cucking to feminism there are a lot of young men who will choose Islam over Christianity.
Islam is inherently anti Marxist. Feminism is Marxism by any other name. Marx made it quite clear clear that he felt Christianity is the opium of the people. Therefore, if to be a Feminist is to be a Marxist, that means accepting Marxist positions which teaches “oppressed oppressor struggles.” This includes his attitudes on Christianity. Therefore, cucking to feminism is cucking to Marxism. This raises the question can you cuck to feminism and still be a Christian because by default you’ve adopted the position the faith is the opiate of the people? I’d say no because of Marx’s world view.
 
As long as Christianity keeps cucking to feminism there are a lot of young men who will choose Islam over Christianity.
Islam is inherently anti Marxist. Feminism is Marxism by any other name. Marx made it quite clear clear that he felt Christianity is the opium of the people. Therefore, if to be a Feminist is to be a Marxist, that means accepting Marxist positions which teaches “oppressed oppressor struggles.” This includes his attitudes on Christianity. Therefore, cucking to feminism is cucking to Marxism. This raises the question can you cuck to feminism and still be a Christian because by default you’ve adopted the position the faith is the opiate of the people? I’d say no because of Marx’s world view.
Doesn't need to be that complicated.

Paul literally says that Women should not teach. The Bible also says women must cover their heads in Church while men must not.

It says women should submit to their husbands. That God ordains all authority in Romans 11, 12, 13.

The most virtuous women in the Bible is Saint Mary, who was a mother at a very young age, Pope Tawadros II said she was probably 12 years old at the Christmas speech last year.

The oldest any one online argues is 15 or 16.

By all accounts, if you are a modern Feminist, you cannot be a good Christian.

That is not to say you can't fall for first wave Feminism and not realise it is still violating Christianity.

For example, I would argue that the Queens of England who refused to marry to retain power were arguably, while not committing adultery, since sex is marriage, were refusing to submit to their husbands and usurping authority, and arguably that was First Wave Feminism.

This is to my knowledge and exclusive failing of Great Britain, my own home. Though if there are other examples my ears are open.
 
Re: Young People Converting to Islam

Who can blame them?

Here's two great reasons:

1. They don't like 🧃

2. They promote family values:



Jonas Brothers Lol GIF by ABC Network
 
As long as Saudi, Qatari, and Emirati paychecks come in, many influencers will promote Islam over Christianity.
So if this is the case… why don’t we have an orthodox state? We could probably make a lot of the same arguments the Jews made to get their homeland… Roman Empire -> Ottomans crushed it -> Romans who inherited the old values would really like a homeland. Yet this never happens? There are no sovereign Christian states anymore. However, there are sovereign Muslim states.
 
So if this is the case… why don’t we have an orthodox state? We could probably make a lot of the same arguments the Jews made to get their homeland… Roman Empire -> Ottomans crushed it -> Romans who inherited the old values would really like a homeland. Yet this never happens? There are no sovereign Christian states anymore. However, there are sovereign Muslim states.
While I understand the cabal in the background is facilitating their efforts in various ways, the bottom line is that muslims are willing to physically and violently fight, lie, and use underhanded tactics to gain new territory and protect whatever they've claimed as their own. Unless its for their benefit, they will not compromise, negotiate, or go against their values. They might be major backstabbers but will protect their women and each other fiercely.

Christian nations have become arrogant and ungrateful with what God blessed them with and as a result have turned their backs on God while simultaneously spitting in His face. As a result, He's blinded their eyes to the reality of what's directly happening in front of them (which has made them soft and docile while seeking a replacement master to serve) while delivering them to their enemies. Satan obviously has taken 100% advantage of their stupidity and made them so divided amongst themselves that any retaliation or unity against invaders is practically impossible. Christian nations have the easiest solution available to reclaim their lands, repent and fully turn back to God. But their secular lifestyle, arrogance, hubris, and brainwashing wont allow them to give up their pleasures and comforts to make any sacrifices.
 
So if this is the case… why don’t we have an orthodox state? We could probably make a lot of the same arguments the Jews made to get their homeland… Roman Empire -> Ottomans crushed it -> Romans who inherited the old values would really like a homeland. Yet this never happens? There are no sovereign Christian states anymore. However, there are sovereign Muslim states.
There isn't a single "Christian" state to be proud of these days. Yes, the Jews got their homeland, and that homeland actually conducts and postures as a Jewish state, for better or worse. Do you see Israel in a "European Union" or other regionalist, globalist entity that dictates what it must or mustn't do? No. In fact most politicians in our countries treat it with incredible deference, reserved for basically no other country. Israel can even openly defy the United States, the supposed global hegemon. We can only watch with awe, admiration, and, of course, considerable disgust.

Don't talk to me about "Orthodox" countries (including the OO one I'm descended from). It's mostly larp, and, other than Russia, most are vulnerable with their politicians more than willing to jump through hoops for Brussels and Washington. As for the West? Oh please.

Sorry for the blackpill, but it is what it is.

Here's an excerpt from a piece by Laurent Guyénot (disclaimer: he is anti-Christian, although a little less hostile to Orthodoxy than Catholicism):
In a recent short video, we see Benjamin Netanyahu being asked what book he is reading now, and answering with a satisfied look that he is reading Jews vs. Rome by Barry Strauss. Asked why he picked it up, he says: “Well, we lost that one, I think we have to win the next one.”

This video has circulated widely (as it was meant to), because it is telling of the way Israel relates to ancient history. This is not the first time Netanyahu shows that he views the history of modern Israel through the lens of ancient history. He does this for the benefit of Israelis (for example when referring to the Palestinians of Gaza as Amalek in October 2023) as well as Gentiles (for example when comparing Trump to Cyrus for recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in March 2018). This is not just rhetoric. Zionists like Netanyahu are genuinely obsessed by what they think happened to ancient Israel two or three thousand years ago in their struggles with various empires. This obsession is shared by all Zionists since David Ben-Gurion, who had changed his name Grün to that of a Jewish general fighting the Romans. Dan Kurzman writes in his biography Prophet of Fire: “Ben-Gurion was, in a modern sense, Moses, Joshua, Isaiah.” In his view, the rebirth of Israel in 1948 “paralleled the Exodus from Egypt, the conquest of the land by Joshua, the Maccabean revolt.” Ben-Gurion was not religious at all, yet he was thoroughly biblical.
While the West (and, increasingly, Eastern Europe) shakes their asses on the dance floor, and its bought-and-paid-for politicians do mostly what is asked of them, this is what the leader of Israel is preoccupied with.
 
Last edited:
While the West (and, increasingly, Eastern Europe) shakes their asses on the dance floor, and its bought-and-paid-for politicians do mostly what is asked of them, this is what the leader of Israel is preoccupied with.
Huh, I kind of have to respect Netanyahu for making callbacks to ancient history. Even if he's on the side of evil, it kind of me reminds me what people on our side are doing in learning their history, what the Greeks did in becoming more traditional before rebelling against the Ottomans.

In that sense, Benjamin Netanyahu might not be King Herod the Great, but the Jewish family head in charge of the secret families using the Rockefellers and Rothschilds as fronts to avoid being countered by Christians most certainly is.

During the Maccabean wars, the Edomites were subjugated by the Jews and forced to convert to Judaism. Through it all, the Edomites maintained much of their old hatred for the Jews. When Greek became the common language, the Edomites were called Idumaeans. With the rise of the Roman Empire, an Idumaean whose father had converted to Judaism was named king of Judea. That Idumaean is known in history as King Herod the Great, the tyrant who ordered a massacre in Bethlehem in an attempt to kill the Christ child (Matthew 2:16-18).
 
Back
Top