Sorry, but I don't think this belongs to CIK- and Samseau will probably agree with me on this.
This is probably a rage-bait meme from some defunct "WN" site from the late 2000s.
It's a false comparison: the picture the lady on o the right is probably edited/photo-shopped . Also, the lady on the left is probably at least 10 years older (not that there is anything unattractive about her) than the one on the right.
Why don't you compare a 24-year old, legitimate 9/10 from Rwanda/Botswana,/China/El Salvador with a 24-year old White European/American 9/10... most of you would reconsider your "white separatist" views and suddenly you would find it ok " mix with non-Whites".
Frankly , as I age , I increasingly find non-White ladies attractive. Please don't start your tedious talk about IQs. I don't care if my future wife/mother of my children is dumb as a box of rocks. The only things I consider are the following:
Do I find her attractive?
Does she believe in God?
Does she respect me and love me? Does she have a potential to be my future wife and the mother of my future children?
Is she able and willing to give me children?
Are her parent going to accept me into the family?
If the answer is yes to the questions above, I would go for the lady, regardless of her ethnic background. In fact, I have always preferred non-White ladies over White women.
What most of you guys don’t realize is it is not a “which denomination you go to issue”? White women are far too gone. They have always been more susceptible to satanic/demonic influences than non-White ladies.
Whether is an orthodox girl from Romania or Russia, a Catholic girl from Spain , a Protestant White girl from small-town American Midwest are far too gone. Heck, even the Whitest of Mormons in Utah apparently have escalating divorce rates these days. There are no unicors. (They never existed in the first place).
What many of you guys ask? “Are you even White ? Would you say the same about your own mother and sister?”
Did you watch the series Sopranos? My late mother was like the Eastern European version of Livia Soprano, except much worse. (May she burn in hell forever). She abused our late father (he died of cancer in his 40s) and never loved her two sons.
My only sister was like Janice Soprano, except much worse. An utterly malicious, insufferable c*nt. At least Janice Soprano eventually changed her ways, married a guys and had a child. Not my so-called sister: a money-hungry cat-lady in her 40s, getting drunk on cheap wine most evenings. Not that we talk anymore.
Sadly, I lost my brother a few years ago. He left whatever he had to me. Our “sister” got outraged, demanding money from me (She had no spoken to her brother for years). My warning to her was clear: if she contacted me again, I would file for a restraining order against her. Then the harassment stopped.
If I don’t hear from her again, it will be soon enough.
My female cousins and second-cousins (with the exception of one) aren’t much better.
I was red-pilled in my teens. Long before red pill was even a concept.
The things I have seen, can never be unseen.
In the co-educated student accommodation of the college I was attending. White Eastern European girls did things that even your White Midwestern Tiffanys, Jessicas and Beckys would have been too ashamed to do. And that was the early 2000s. Long before social media, OnlyFools and the like. (And gee wizz, some poor simp suckers have probably married those things up since) I dread to think what White girls are like today.
(Yes, EE was never a paradise contrary to what some guys say here. It was always of this damaged microcosm of what was going on in the West, distorted by desperation and amplified by over-compensation).
When I moved to the West (first Western Europe than the US). Any sane, family-oriented ladies I met was non-White.
I have always wanted to start a family with a non-White lady.
And what many guys don’t realize is: white males who marry non-White ladies and have children do more for your survival than the b*tching and whining here, plus waiting for that proverbial unicorn , “White girl that is not like the rest" that goes on here.
If a White male marries a non-White lady and they have a child: a White child is born.
The Bible itself makes it clear that is the father's seed that determines the child's bloodline, genealogy.
Such marriages have always been commonplace in the West. The Portuguese, the Spanish and the French did it more openly. The English and the Dutch less openly.
We know that White males routinely married Indigenous women as in what is the US today -as early as the 1600s. White men married freed Black ladies in 1800s. The segregation was not as enforced as you think.
The whole country of Brazil was built on such marriages. The first generation of Brazilian intellectuals came in all colors- but they were highly educated and intelligent. Why? Because most of them were children that Portuguese Jesuits had with Indigenous and Black Brazilian women.
A closer example. This is not a criticism as a love the Comanche Nation.
The Comanche Nation once was the most feared tribe in North America. In it heights of the Comancheria (1850s) was the largest empire in North America – who brought fear and terror to both the US as well as the Mexican government.
Nowadays, if you visit the Comanche Nation in Oklahoma (a very welcoming, friendly community) you will find people who are proud of their history and culture (“Comanche strong, stronger together”) yet, (outside of powwows) they do not look or act any differently (except perhaps a few of their eldest members) than your average non-Indigenous, White American in small-town Oklahoma. Peaceful, amicable but also industrious and hard-working folks. So what intermarriage in reality did was not creating more Indigenous American folks: it created more White folks.
This may be a struggle for survival but not in the way some people think: large part of it is decided in bedrooms and maternity wards…not public parks or social media platforms.
I am sorry about the long-post.
Stay safe.