Music got his 2 week temp ban extended for plagiarism from a while back.
WHY WUZ TEH BANT (Contest my ban lounge)
- Thread starter Johnnyvee
- Start date
Music got his 2 week temp ban extended for plagiarism from a while back.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
It seems it was in the middle of it too. The original ban was on April 6 for 2 weeks
However, the next ban was extended to May 15, which is more than a month later.
So since music’s ban was adjusted in the middle of the 2 weeks when he did nothing, it was retroactive for something that seemed to occur a while back. IMO this is unjust, and while Music should not have created an account, I understand wanting to investigate. I think since his month ban was unwarranted, and he has served more than a month from the forum, he should be allowed back. Otherwise, it sends the message mods can just extend bans in the middle of the ban despite someone not doing something during it, which is what occurred when music’s ban was extended from 2 weeks to a month, (more than a month overall).
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
So, let’s get this straight, I was asking a question which no one answered, including yourself, who responded with a “yawning” emoji, in post 240. However when someone finally does give info, and I can make a conclusion, then you decide to jump in?
It would’ve been much easier to just answer the question in 240 straight up, but I suppose it’s funner to correct someone after the fact to “own” them, as well as responding with another “thumbs down.”
Also @Steady Hands we finally were able to get Samseau to answer questions regarding retroactive bans, while he refused to answer when straight up asked, he was willing to respond when it was pointed out and called unjust.
Also, in theory PMs could be sent regarding the other violation so the user is given a heads up, as opposed to a retroactive compounding ban. So “must” isn’t correct in this case. If music was sent a PM regarding the plagiarism which requested him to stop upon return thongs would be fine.
Last edited:
Earlier you were defending a guy who banned people for fun back on the old forum and now you're going to bat over here for a guy who was a blatantly bad actor over dumb technicalities, if they are even that, trying to knock down a mod. That same guy you were defending earlier would have banned you 20 posts ago in this thread.
Stop constantly trying to sow
My advice:
Yo man.... Let it go.
It's an imperfect world and you're making too much.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
Are you referring to @DanielH? I wasn’t defending him I pointed out the reason he left the forum.
What’s nauseating is when you constantly jump in when someone criticizes Samseau. What are you his personal bodyguard or something? This behavior is pathetic, let the man stand up for himself.
Edit: also the word is “discord”, not “discourse.”
Speak for yourself, I am not trying to sow discourse, I am investigating what went down and no one was answering what occurred with the two week ban being extended to a month. Also, do not assume things about other users, always give users the benefit of the doubt:
Last edited:
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
I’m not making too much. I wanted an answer which I finally received. I understand the situation now.
Childish deflection with a lack of self awareness. It's not an assumption, your motives here are clear as day.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
No it is an assumption, I wanted to understand what was going on. If no one replied to post 242 this would be over.
Samseau has a track record of going against pro-white causes. In another thread he referred to Patriot Front as “Pagan Front”, despite not being a religious group, which caused @DanielH to leave.
He also advocated for white men to marry foreign women in order to avoid extinction:
So let’s check out his track record:
-posts a Shapiro-esque thread title which portrays Shiloh in a negative light.
-Calls white nationalist Patriot Front “pagan front” and scares away former prominent user @DanielH
-advocates race mixing as a form of preventing white extinction
Not the most pro-white stances.
So you weren't defending DanielH and you're not trying to sow discourse you said?
At least be man enough to own up to your intentions instead of lying and playing innocent victim, I would at least have some amount of respect for that.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
That was a post in another thread where I was informing a user of samseau going against white causes, since that user pointed out the “Shapiro-esque” title. It was meant to make that user aware, not to “sow discord.”
Oh okay, so it doesn't count that you were defending DanielH and trying to sow discord because it was in another thread and you were just posting it for "awareness"....you didn't actually lie. Got it....thanks, you also definitely don't have a lack of self awareness, for sure.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
Wasn’t defending him, I pointed out the reason he left.
No, I wasn’t.
This isn’t loving, this is sarcastic condescension which is not fitting for a Christian forum.
Furthermore, you’ve accused @Australia Sucks of wanting to use the data sheets for fornication instead of wife hunting and when I pointed out there was nothing in the datasheets thread regarding fornication, you were silent.
Stop assuming things about others. It’s against the rules.
Nice deflection again, I haven't done anything but confront you with your own words buddy.
I wasn't silent, I pointed out the thread where he was specifically talking about sex and you said it didn't count because it was a different thread....just like you're doing here. You have an extremely skewed way of justifying things in your mind, sometimes it's just not worth discussing things with you because of it so I move on.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
It was the thread made later where Australia was focused on wife hunting (non sinful) as opposed to game (sinful.)
It doesn’t count because I wasn’t sowing discord in either place.
No, in that case when I pointed out the datasheets thread, there was no response from you since I proved you wrong.
If it’s not worth discussing feel free to leave this thread as opposed to sowing discord.
Here you go again:
You're going to tell me that doesn't count because it's not the "datasheet thread" right? Why would I even bother responding to something that naive and dishonest? Why are we even talking about AS at all the poor guy has nothing to do with any of this, what you're trying to draw him in to defend you like you always do for him against me?
The guy saying we need an ethnic cleansing is talking to me about Christian like behavior.....that's cute.
You wanna hear something that always makes me chuckle? Some of the guys here that you vehemently defend only because you think they are "white" are actually not white at all.....not even close to being "white" any way you want to define it. Let that boil over in your head, have fun with that one.
Again your motives are clear, good luck.
You're going to tell me that doesn't count because it's not the "datasheet thread" right? Why would I even bother responding to something that naive and dishonest? Why are we even talking about AS at all the poor guy has nothing to do with any of this, what you're trying to draw him in to defend you like you always do for him against me?
The guy saying we need an ethnic cleansing is talking to me about Christian like behavior.....that's cute.
You wanna hear something that always makes me chuckle? Some of the guys here that you vehemently defend only because you think they are "white" are actually not white at all.....not even close to being "white" any way you want to define it. Let that boil over in your head, have fun with that one.
Again your motives are clear, good luck.
Last edited:
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
That thread was closed which resulted in another thread with different motives. The datasheets thread was about wife hunting abroad.Here you go again:
You're going to tell me that doesn't count because it's not the "datasheet thread" right? Why would I even bother responding to something that naive and dishonest? Why are we even talking about AS at all the poor guy has nothing to do with any of this, what you're trying to draw him in to defend you like you always do for him against me?
The guy saying we need an ethnic cleansing is talking to me about Christian like behavior.....that's cute.
You wanna hear something that always makes me chuckle? Some of the guys here that you vehemently defend only because you think they are "white" are actually not white at all.....not even close to being "white" any way you want to define it. Let that boil over in your head, have fun with that one.
Again your motives are clear, good luck.
Changing the wording doesn't change someone's motives, you cannot possibly believe that to be the case beyond just trying to argue for arguments sake. But regardless again why are we talking about AS? Just more deflection....
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
No, the thread was entirely new and was a response to being told game discussion was not allowed, so AS decided to shift the focus to wife hunting.
Who, AS? He’s not Indian.