The Destruction of Modern Women

Samseau said:
Harvey is the same ogre that BUILT that system back in the 80's and 90's with his political support and messaging. No sympathy for him.
Click to expand...
This was the same #MeToo bandwagon that got Trump on the hook for $5 million and then an extra $80+ million for “defaming” E. Jean Carroll over her “rape” and “sexual assault” allegations.

I am not saying that knowing what HW’s genitalia and body look like proves “rape” (there was a lot of transactional sex in his life), but the accusers got the most basic details about these aspects completely wrong, i.e. they provably made the allegations up.

Any system that allows that and rewards it is the same system that took a bizarre set of allegations from a truly bizarre woman named E. Jean Carroll (see her Anderson Cooper interview, for example) and tried to ruin Trump again.

The best way to try and destroy a man’s reputation, whether it’s Assange (whom I am half to three-quarters very critical of) or Trump, is still by making or flaring up amorphous and false/dubious sexual assault and rape allegations.

This is not about some maudlin sympathy of mine for Weinstein.

The critical lack of corroborating evidence against him, plus outright lies from a number of accusers, flows into the rest of the legal system.
 
dgbrown said:
The critical lack of corroborating evidence against him, plus outright lies from a number of accusers, flows into the rest of the legal system.
Click to expand...
I think all they are saying is to quit doing the "literally this is the CASE" when the bad actors live and die by the gun, just let it be. Worrying about truth technicalities is what the left uses against the right all the time.
 
dgbrown said:
This was the same #MeToo bandwagon that got Trump on the hook for $5 million and then an extra $80+ million for “defaming” E. Jean Carroll over her “rape” and “sexual assault” allegations.

I am not saying that knowing what HW’s genitalia and body look like proves “rape” (there was a lot of transactional sex in his life), but the accusers got the most basic details about these aspects completely wrong, i.e. they provably made the allegations up.

Any system that allows that and rewards it is the same system that took a bizarre set of allegations from a truly bizarre woman named E. Jean Carroll (see her Anderson Cooper interview, for example) and tried to ruin Trump again.

The best way to try and destroy a man’s reputation, whether it’s Assange (whom I am half to three-quarters very critical of) or Trump, is still by making or flaring up amorphous and false/dubious sexual assault and rape allegations.

This is not about some maudlin sympathy of mine for Weinstein.

The critical lack of corroborating evidence against him, plus outright lies from a number of accusers, flows into the rest of the legal system.
Click to expand...

You fail to realize that Harvey was consumed by the system he built. Until Harvey was removed from power then there was no way to fix the system.

It was a great victory to get rid of him, now the brainwashing from (((Hollywood))) stops and things can return to normal. Indeed Hollywood since Harvey's departure is far less influential. The expose on Weinstein did a lot to discredit Talmudwood, and most young women watch youtube/netflix/streaming.

Yes they tried to use that system to destroy Trump, but it failed and now the pendulum swings back the other way. We can restore the justice system with the removal of bad judges and appointment of good ones.
 
Australia Sucks said:
Every time I see this type of nonsense I feel that a Taliban style system is the only way to keep women in line. Are women just naturally mentally ill if they are aren't beaten into submission by a strong patriarchal society?
Click to expand...
Let's not go too far here, AS. What has been lost is the obvious manner in which things can be rightly accomplished, which is raise women in a manner in which the information and society act consistently and in a way that leads to family formation. That includes the proper roles, shaming, direction, and majority belief in what is good and right. Will you get some 3-6% of rebellious actors still? Yes. But you can dramatically help out the rest of the women, and men as a result, even though about 5% of men will be very bad actors, too.
 
PurpleUrkel said:
Who knows what is real or fake anymore. But I think I found either Blade Runner, IIMT, or Australia Sucks a western unicorn. Go get her guys!
Click to expand...

I would expect most single women in the west to behave this way. This is why they are liberal, they take other people's resources (in her mind she can find a man to pay this back) and hand it to those whom they deem worthy. Their idea of "worthy" is the people they see as beneath them. This works great for motherhood, and it is a disaster large enough to collapse the largest and strongest civilizations when they are given equality. This is why they vote liberal, this is why they chase criminals and spit on good men, this is the result of women's equality.

Take an average guy, every bit as good as her dad as, and have him just try to start a conversation with her. She will probably nearly freak out and become as closed off or rude as one can be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top