Enough to neutralize a lot of good men, that's for sure.
The Barbarian Invasion of Europe
- Thread starter N°6
- Start date
-
- Tags
- immigration
People are coming to realize that it's futile, sadly, to encourage various things and belief systems in order to change the common person. He's either a blue pilled normie who is bitter he doesn't get material or p (a few have just given up and moved on to lives of fun or games, sportsball), or he's married and is locked in to the wife's frame. There are very few exceptions to this, though there are. The next problem? Even if you think your kids can inherit something and be OK, the control over USD will be so great with the current regime change to support treasuries (USDT/C), you'll be neutralized. A breakaway region with BTC would be the only hope for those, and others with it might go there but likely will also go to different countries and be elite or leaders there. Most people don't realize how far away they'll need to be when most of the people who finally realize they have zero to look forward to, chimp out. The best hope would be they are doped up and sullen by weed, booze, games. Sad.
More than a world war.
20 years is not long at all. 2005 was just yesterday.
1000s of years of European history, and it will be gone in one short generation.
I missed Blade Runner's point, I thought he said what you say here, must have been tired, even though he had human lifespan, not historical time spans in mind.
Like going to prison during your best years in effect- paraphrasing, I think I stole the idea from you.
On the individual level, I like to say, without looking down on anybody, if you marry a non white you'll change what your family was like since the beginning of the world. For the other party it won't be as profound, my own thoughts, BR also pointed it out multiple times.
This tends to ruffle feathers as it hints at the race question(s), though I don't dwell on it. The topic is inarguable, as everyone's actions indicate that certain characteristics are desired and not only bother only one side, the other side is more than happy to have a different look or a mixed progeny. The reason is the dominance and penetration of particular traits.
The other way of seeing it is that you're only going to see Kalergi from one side, which is the point of the "plan".
What will really get your noodle is thinking about how empires changed and "peoples" or nations formed from 1500 BC to 500 AD. They ebbed and flowed for all those centuries. And probably several thousand before then.
Yes, I know this is true. There were large movements of peoples into Europe after the fall of the Roman empire, and large movements going back over 1000s of years before that.
To be precise, what I think of as the European people are those who have been there for about 1500 years. Saying 1000s makes it sound like longer than that.
Asked Grok to estimate which 5 Euro countries has the highest and lowest net non-white immigration per capita. Didn't expect to see my own country there...
Top 5 (Highest Net Non-White Immigration Per Capita)
Top 5 (Highest Net Non-White Immigration Per Capita)
- Malta (Pop: 563,000): 14.2–17.8 per 1000
- High due to African migration and small population.
- Luxembourg (Pop: 672,000): 7.4–10.4 per 1000
- Driven by economic pull and Asian/African workers.
- Cyprus (Pop: 1,268,000): 4.7–6.3 per 1000
- Asylum-seekers and workers from Asia/Middle East.
- Norway (Pop: 5,590,000): 2.7–3.6 per 1000
- Asylum and family migration from Africa/Asia.
- Ireland (Pop: 5,340,000): 1.9–2.8 per 1000
- Economic migration, especially from India.
- Poland (Pop: 37,660,000): 0.05–0.08 per 1000
- Focus on Ukrainian migrants, strict asylum rules.
- Hungary (Pop: 9,580,000): 0.10–0.21 per 1000
- Tight border controls, low asylum intake.
- Bulgaria (Pop: 6,390,000): 0.16–0.31 per 1000
- Low economic pull, minimal asylum.
- Slovakia (Pop: 5,420,000): 0.18–0.55 per 1000
- Few non-European migrants, Ukrainian focus.
- Lithuania (Pop: 2,890,000): 0.35–0.69 per 1000
- Remote from migration routes, strict policies.
- 2024 data is incomplete; estimates use 2023 trends.
- “Non-white” is proxied as Africa/Asia/Latin America.
- Small populations amplify per capita rates in Malta/Luxembourg.
Last edited:
Exactly right. Anyone who's studied history in depth knows that racial purity isn't a big concern. The recessive genes control things and that's why some cultures dominate for thousands of years even after going through significant genetic changes.
The Greeks come to mind, the Greeks that lead the Byzantine Empire were not like the Greeks of Alexander's day. But they shared the same recessive Greek genome, had the same basic similarities, and could identify as the same people.
Greeks today have had a lot of Turk admixture, and it will be some time before the Greek genome recovers, but I still meet full blooded Greeks so it is possible.
Nothing happening today is new, there is nothing new under the sun. There's no need to worry about it God has this in His control.
Do you actually have any evidence of this?
Greeks cluster genetically with other Europeans, no evidence of much Turkic admixture.
Yes, it's important to be reminded of it. Our sojourn in this life is pretty confusing, as God gave us instincts and gifts, and even those work against eternal things. That's part of the mystery of life.
As for the Greeks, they have different issues. Not a lot of Turkic admixture is correct, especially since most western Turks are actually "Greek". The terminology becomes chicken and egg after a while though, which is our point with the arbitrary nature of thinking about "nations" when humans have been around for tens of thousands of years.
What is this from, and how many generations does it go back?
In Australia Chinese billionaires and Chinese state owned corporations are buying many of the larger farms.
This region (Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, etc) has a lot of history and culture. If you go back thousands of years these people were not exactly mud hut Africans. How come their culture has degraded so much?
^Yes, it's more like a lot of Greeks from Asia Minor and Constantinople became turkified.
In India there was always an element of misery at the bottom, it is perhaps the most socially stratified society in the world. China was a bit more advanced in that area, their farmers lived a bit better, overall (though they had mass starvation events as a lot of the population lived near the banks of the main rivers and were subject to flooding) until the 19th century and the upheavals caused by the Opium Wars and Taiping civil war, which funnily enough bears a lot of resemblance with modern civil wars like the Syrian one.
In India there was always an element of misery at the bottom, it is perhaps the most socially stratified society in the world. China was a bit more advanced in that area, their farmers lived a bit better, overall (though they had mass starvation events as a lot of the population lived near the banks of the main rivers and were subject to flooding) until the 19th century and the upheavals caused by the Opium Wars and Taiping civil war, which funnily enough bears a lot of resemblance with modern civil wars like the Syrian one.
It's a PCA plot from this study of DNA. It doesn't go by generation, the results are what you see from thousands of years of human genetic propagation.
Genes mirror geography within Europe - Nature
The power of the latest massively parallel synthetic DNA sequencing technologies is demonstrated in two major collaborations that shed light on the nature of genomic variation with ethnicity. The first describes the genomic characterization of an individual from the Yoruba ethnic group of west...
www.nature.com