The China Thread

[Cooper]

Study on global attitudes towards reporting and returning found wallets. Muh high trust society!

This is a prime example of studies gaming the inputs to get their result.

The methodology used in this study relies exclusively on the amount of email responses by the good samaritans.

Here's the problem though, few people in China use email, the great majority of their communication is done by WeChat or AliPay. So if a Chinese passer by finds a wallet and wants to contact his owner, he will use these very widespread means to do so, and will thus not be accounted for in the study above.

The question here is whether the authors of this study, Alain Cohn and David Tannenbaum, were aware of this fact...



You can't have in the same country people dropping packages with new laptops in front of apartment doors simultaneously with people not returning wallets, makes zero sense, unless you're pozzed by Serpentza-level indoctrination.

 

[Cooper]

Calling China a high trust society is late stage brain rot and Chang whisperer Lil Coop yet again exposing himself as full of it, what else is new. Per usual banking on the ignorance of the crowd to push increasingly bizarre Chang propaganda.

You've never been to China recently, or perhaps not at all, have you?

China is the #1 example of being a dog eat dog highly predatorial swindler/gangster society. In Chinese society only money counts. In the justice system only connections, money and raw power matter. To achieve status and money all is allowed, the moralists and Captain Save a Hoe's get laughed at and made fun of. Concepts like self sacrifice, empathy and morality exist only on the fringes. It's quite literally 'me, myself and I' as the main underpinning of any non-familiar relationships.

If this were even remotely true, China would have never risen to rank of greatest industrial power, it would have just remained as dirty, corrupt, stodgy and backwards as India, or failed states from Latin America like Colombia or Argentina.

Think about it, if you can. Granted, not a given.

The concept of Truth (like Liberty) has no place in contemporary China. End result of 80 years of commie killing, social engineering & propaganda and millenia of periodic culls and legalist state forms to boot. Any rebellious and upstanding genetic lineages have by know been weeded out thoroughly, only slave mentality is left. Which by extension explains the deluge of CCP sludge coming our way, as always turn the slopaganda on it's head to get a proper view of reality.

Most of the Chinese upper classes did survive the Cultural Revolution. The truth is in the pudding, most of the current Chinese nomenklatura like Xi or Wang Huning were upper class who rose to the top through sheer meritocracy. That is one of the main differences between China and Russia, where the upper classes, urban and rural elites, and the clergy was mostly genocided in a more systematic Jewish Bolshevik extermination system.

In China, the hardcore commies relished seeing the bourgies toil in the fields or be humiliated, these victims could survive by engaging in endless struggle sessions. It wasn't like Cambodia's killing fields where the camps were an extermination conveyor belt for the upper class, no amount of kowtowing was going to save them. Most of the people who died under Mao were peasants who starved to death.

Quite frankly in China if it ain't bolted down it's gonna get ripped. Hence why public hospital restrooms (the previous propaganda boon) don't have any toiletries, or other basics.

I love the use of "quite frankly" here, as if there was anything frank about you postulating about Chinese behavior and mores with nothing in terms of actual knowledge beyond the pathetic content of VOA-NED-USAID sponsored propaganda.

So in LaNegra's warped vision of China, the Chinese will just steal anything that isn't bolted, but the packages, in an era and place where most transactions are conducted online, are just deposited in apartment entrances for anyone to pick up. Makes perfect sense...

 

[Cooper]

Klaus Schwab is ((Heinz Kissinger's)) protege, who is in turn ((Hans Morgenthau's)) apprentice. Morgenthau is the gargantuan geostrategic thinker who created the realist paradigm through which international relations gets viewed anno 2025, and who coined the term 'multipolarity'. Morgenthau, like so many others in FDR's administration, was also a Soviet spy who chaired the Academic Committe for Soviet Jewry, and Morgenthau had a personal relationship with rabbi Mendel Shneerson. Morgenthau's two main disciples in working out his multipolar worldview were ((Karl Wolfgang Deutsch)) and ((David J. Singer)). Ergo Morgenthau's book 'Politics Amongst Nations' is the starting point to understanding current geopolitical machinations - ranking before anything written by Huntington, CS Lewis or Brzezinsky.

Long story short, the financial elite for long had set up the US to lose its hegemonic position and become isolated, with the center of power moving from the Atlantic to the Pacific (Kissinger's words during the 2017 Jeju Asian Development Bank Conference). China has obviously been groomed since the 70s to become the new global center, the Jews of whatever flavor have quite literally been backdooring about any US high tech secret to the Changs for free, and the whole Covid theater was supposed to be the final nail in the coffin. Yet the Skull and Bones Boyz said NO and Trump is their tool to clean up this scheme.The Europeans and Israeli have been in a very duplicious role and the Beijing-Moscow-Berlin axis was supposed to replace US hegemony.

The Trump Administration is wide awake to the machinations going on behind the scenes. The Changs are in a disadvantaged position due to the US Navy controlling all major naval corridors, the US being largely self sufficient whilst China is mass importer, due to the US technological headstart and Washington's superior MIC and military. Hence that's why the Chinese designed a slew of fifth generation warfare programs designed to weaken the US from within. The Chang prefer their economic, chemical, environmental and material subterfuge to open warfare. Open warfare China's weakest game, after all. They've been hitting the whole world non-stop through every avenue besides bombs.

I added a couple of stills from WEF produced videos.

Infamous 2017 WEF video, now basically scrapped from the web, very cohencidental.



Still from video

View attachment 20384
2015:

View attachment 20381

2014:

View attachment 20383

2019:

View attachment 20382

2024: UN boss Antonio Guterres yapping about multipolarity, UN boss Guterres is unapologetic about his commie past bytheway.

LaNegra will write treatises and paste walls of texts and photos almost as bad as MFTP, pushing a thesis that is completely incompatible with this simple fact, which LaNegra will continue to ignore.

 

[Australia Sucks]

Most of the Chinese upper classes did survive the Cultural Revolution. The truth is in the pudding, most of the current Chinese nomenklatura like Xi or Wang Huning were upper class who rose to the top through sheer meritocracy. That is one of the main differences between China and Russia, where the upper classes, urban and rural elites, and the clergy was mostly genocided in a more systematic Jewish Bolshevik extermination system.

Meritocracy? People like Presdient Putin and President Nayib Bukele or back in the day Prime Minister of Estonia Laart Mars, Lee Kuan Yew etc these are intelligent leaders (I don't like Putin or his policies but it would be disingenuos to claim he is dumb). President Xi is as incomeptent as your average western politician and his rise to the top has nothing to do with merit.

 

[Australia Sucks]

If this were even remotely true, China would have never risen to rank of greatest industrial power, it would have just remained as dirty, corrupt, stodgy and backwards as India, or failed states from Latin America like Colombia or Argentina.

Think about it, if you can. Granted, not a given.

The difference is that countries like Argentina, Colombia and India do not have an all powerful big brother police state keeping the plebs in line like China does. Chinese people as a whole only act civilized because the police state is breathing down their necks.

 

[Cooper]

Meritocracy? People like Presdient Putin and President Nayib Bukele or back in the day Prime Minister of Estonia Laart Mars, Lee Kuan Yew etc these are intelligent leaders (I don't like Putin or his policies but it would be disingenuos to claim he is dumb). President Xi is as incomeptent as your average western politician and his rise to the top has nothing to do with merit.

Lee Kuan Yew foresaw the rise of China all the way back in the 1960s, when China was poorer per capita than Haiti or Senegal and the majority of people starving in the world were Chinese:


Lee Kuan Yew was an admirer of Xi Jinping (and vice versa), and with all due respect, he is in a better position to judge than clowns for hire like SerpentZA:

In fact, Xi and other CCP leaders used Singapore as a model for China, hence LKY's positive stance on Xi. Singapore is an authoritarian country, where the majority of ethnic Chinese came from modest backgrounds and had repulsive habits like spitting in public places that were long domesticated through a high-minded authoritarian government and education system.

The difference is that countries like Argentina, Colombia and India do not have an all powerful big brother police state keeping the plebs in line like China does. Chinese people as a whole only act civilized because the police state is breathing down their necks.

Argentina fared better when they had an authoritarian government. And of course Singapore is far more authoritarian than the countries you've named. "Muh democracy" is a neoliberal concept where people have been brainwashed to believe that if they're free to say Trump/Biden sucks, to smoke dope or espouse feminism and other Jewish "isms", they truly are free, as opposed to their ability to start and raise families, reach economic prosperity and live in a country that isn't a slave to a foreign hegemon.

One of the main features of these governments is that the upper classes in these countries look down if not outright hate their masses, especially in India. That is the difference between them and China. In China, the civic managerial class is elite, you have to pass a competitive exam where you have to score above the top 1% to work as an administrator in a municipality or county. From there on, these managers climb the ranks based on their performance. That is the path of nearly all the higher politburo echelons.

In Argentina you have a mix of a comprador upper class that aspires to be western and collaborates with multinationals and globalists for their own benefit at the expense of their people. Milei is a perfect example of this, he is stripping his people of privileges like the ability of the lower middle classes in Argentina to eat grass-fed beef steaks and quality red wine nearly every day.

 

[Australia Sucks]

I actually think Hu Jintao and Deng Xiaopeng were okay as leaders but China lost the plot with Xi Zinping.

Milei is a perfect example of this, he is stripping his people of privileges like the ability of the lower middle classes in Argentina to eat grass-fed beef steaks and quality red wine nearly every day.

That was never going to be sustainable long term. That occurred because of restrictions/quotas on beef and wine exports which caused shrinkage of production over time. If the trend had continued eventually enough producers of agricultural products would have gone bankrupt that the price would have risen anyway. The government was previously just kicking the can down the road.

 

[Samseau]

And of course Singapore is far more authoritarian than the countries you've named. "Muh democracy" is a neoliberal concept where people have been brainwashed to believe that if they're free to say Trump/Biden sucks, to smoke dope or espouse feminism and other Jewish "isms", they truly are free, as opposed to their ability to start and raise families, reach economic prosperity and live in a country that isn't a slave to a foreign hegemon.

And they are starting families in China? One of the lowest birthrates in the world.

 

[Cooper]

^Similar problems across east Asia, situation is worse in Japan, Korea and Taiwan.

China is a bit better there because housing is more accessible, but worse due to greater gender imbalance.

China: sex ratio by age group| Statista

The sex ratio of China's population varies significantly across age groups. In 2021, the group of 15 to 19-year-old children had the largest gender disparity.

www.statista.com

In the long term, China is better positioned to deal with this problem, as it is one of the very rare industrialized countries to install common sense policies like this, which is going to destroy their gold diggers and reduce considerably their divorce rate:



This would never happen in any western country, not sure if it could even happen in eastern Europe...

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

I think the smarter people are figuring out that China is way ahead of the west in technology and military power, and they are starting to realize where this will head if we don't deal with the DEI situation.

 

[Samseau]

^Similar problems across east Asia, situation is worse in Japan, Korea and Taiwan.

China is a bit better there because housing is more accessible, but worse due to greater gender imbalance.

China: sex ratio by age group| Statista

The sex ratio of China's population varies significantly across age groups. In 2021, the group of 15 to 19-year-old children had the largest gender disparity.

www.statista.com

In the long term, China is better positioned to deal with this problem, as it is one of the very rare industrialized countries to install common sense policies like this, which is going to destroy their gold diggers and reduce considerably their divorce rate:



This would never happen in any western country, not sure if it could even happen in eastern Europe...

The proposed law will make marriages drop even further. If women only get back what they put in, this means women are now forced to go on the career route so that if they marry then can avoid being left penniless in the event of a divorce.

As we all know, career women are not only terrible wives, but, also, just having a career significantly decreases the odds of a marriage, let alone an early marriage, which further depresses birthrates.

We can expect birthrates in China to crash even further under such a braindead law.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

The proposed law will make marriages drop even further. If women only get back what they put in, this means women are now forced to go on the career route so that if they marry then can avoid being left penniless in the event of a divorce.

As we all know, career women are not only terrible wives, but, also, just having a career significantly decreases the odds of a marriage, let alone an early marriage, which further depresses birthrates.

We can expect birthrates in China to crash even further under such a braindead law.

China needs their population to drop and that is their goal. They also want to keep their women from overthrowing their safe society, like the women in the west have done. They are making the right steps to soon be the world's lone superpower.

 

[Samseau]

China needs their population to drop and that is their goal. They also want to keep their women from overthrowing their safe society, like the women in the west have done. They are making the right steps to soon be the world's lone superpower.

They are dropping their population at breakneck speeds that will be impossible to reverse. You can't go from 2000mph to 0 overnight.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

They are dropping their population at breakneck speeds that will be impossible to reverse. You can't go from 2000mph to 0 overnight.

If any country could do it, it would be China. They caused themselves to vastly overpopulate under Mao, so he would have a huge army to fight in the next great war. They did it before, under much worse circumstances, I think they can do it. In the west, it would be much more difficult to do, it could be done, but it would be much harder.