Business is war has been a thing for a while in China.The whole concept that asking for fair trade deserves "retaliation" and threats is pretty ridiculous....
One important consideration that is always left out in online analysis is whether or not the goods being traded are elastic or inelastic. Two very important economic variables.
Inelastic goods are things that people need, such as food, energy, or water. People will pay any price for these things and the demand cannot change, which is why it's inelastic. Most wars are fought over these goods as it's where the money is at.
Elastic goods are luxuries that are optional, and are typically things women enjoy. The prices of such items raise and fall with trends and demand for such trinkets are highly variable, which is why they are elastic like a rubber band. No wars are ever fought over such things as there's always another trend to exploit.
Thus when the "West" tried to sanction Russia it was doomed, since Russia deals majority in inelastic goods like food, energy, rare earths, etc. People will find ways to buy this stuff no matter what, it's impossible to control such goods.
Conversely, most of Chinese trade goods are just fads, and aren't necessary for real life survival. People can take them or leave them. Women will be very disappointed they can't get their favorite cosmetics, clothes, or fashion accessories for cheap anymore, but life will go on. China's only inelastic goods are pharmaceuticals and rare earths.
Thus China is in a far weaker position than Russia is, and it's why I believed Russia would come out on top in the Ukrainian war (although very slowly, and I've been predicting stalemate for long as we keep funding the war), but here with China vs. USA trade war, I'm predicting a Chinese smackdown, which Zerohedge is as well. China mainly deals in elastic goods, which means they have no leverage over us.
Ehh, China also makes a lot of tablets and iPhones. For the truly essential items such as semiconductors like microchips that we can’t get anywhere else, we just don’t charge a tariff on theme.
And yes China is far and away the world’s biggest exporter of microchips . So don’t declare victory just yet samseau
We already started construction for these things under the Biden admin several years ago. This is probably a big reason why the tariff war is being greenlit by the Pentagon, they figure America is ready enough to survive any real confrontation.
Thos are very simple jobs and I doubt anyone on here even does these jobs, ok the robot cuts the grass then what? Does it know what to do with the waste grass? What about fertilizing the lawn, creating beautiful landscapes, repairing the irrigation, pruning the roses, picking up the dog crap etc etc, I think where AI will be most effective is in admin jobs but it will be a tool to make your work much faster.I'm not picking a fight, but I will counter with some anecdotal things I am seeing.
There are self driving cars all over my city now. No one inside. There are also about to be autonomous 18-wheelers driving in a designated lane on a freeway. Cabbies, Uber/Lyft drivers, truck driving jobs could all disappear waaay sooner than many realize.
I was just at Six Flags, and there were robots cutting the grass. Say bye bye to many landscaping jobs.
I was just reading about when you order at Wendy's at the drive through the "person" you're ordering from is an AI. It's convincing enough no one can even tell.
Many are saying robotics/AI are going to become super prevalent, super quickly similar to how in less than a decade cell phones went from rare to essentially every man, woman, and most kids even above the age of 11 or 12 having them.
One important consideration that is always left out in online analysis is whether or not the goods being traded are elastic or inelastic. Two very important economic variables.
Inelastic goods are things that people need, such as food, energy, or water. People will pay any price for these things and the demand cannot change, which is why it's inelastic. Most wars are fought over these goods as it's where the money is at.
Elastic goods are luxuries that are optional, and are typically things women enjoy. The prices of such items raise and fall with trends and demand for such trinkets are highly variable, which is why they are elastic like a rubber band. No wars are ever fought over such things as there's always another trend to exploit.
Thus when the "West" tried to sanction Russia it was doomed, since Russia deals majority in inelastic goods like food, energy, rare earths, etc. People will find ways to buy this stuff no matter what, it's impossible to control such goods.
Conversely, most of Chinese trade goods are just fads, and aren't necessary for real life survival. People can take them or leave them. Women will be very disappointed they can't get their favorite cosmetics, clothes, or fashion accessories for cheap anymore, but life will go on. China's only inelastic goods are pharmaceuticals and rare earths.
Thus China is in a far weaker position than Russia is, and it's why I believed Russia would come out on top in the Ukrainian war (although very slowly, and I've been predicting stalemate for long as we keep funding the war), but here with China vs. USA trade war, I'm predicting a Chinese smackdown, which Zerohedge is as well. China mainly deals in elastic goods, which means they have no leverage over us.
The CCP has a kill count in the 9 figures (it's own people) but for much of the last 15-20 years it had quietly stopped talking about the Mao era - in international settings at least. But now, after DJT tightening the screws and de facto ending 50 years of subsidized Chinese growth the theater is over. The CCP is openly and unapologetically reverting to praising its Maoist roots due to the sugarcoating no longer being effective nor necessary.
Chinese MFA spokes woman Mao Ning: