2026 Bible Study Thread

[Tippy]

Exodus 28


The High Priestly garment is also symbolic. The breastplate had 12 precious stones, corresponding to the people of God. The High Priest was to wear this as he entered into the sanctuary. He represents the people to God, their mediator.


The pomegranates invoke the Garden. The High Priest is trying to bring the people back into God's presence, back into Paradise.

Exodus 28

I honestly have no idea what to make of this. I'll try re-reading it again.

Here:

'34;The gold bells and the pomegranates are to alternate around the hem of the robe. 35;Aaron must wear it when he ministers. The sound of the bells will be heard when he enters the Holy Place before the Lord and when he comes out, so that he will not die.'

Interesting point that the pomegranates invoke the garden. But Godfather part 2 you are a protestant and you claim that some of the stuff in Orth or Cath is maybe too ritualized and not solo scriptura but then in the scritpture at certain times is all this focus on rituals. How do you reconcile a movement away from this compared to the details put about here?

 

[Tippy]

Exodus 29


The priests had to be from the tribe of Levi and descended from Aaron. Before they could consecrate, they must first be consecrated. This was done through the sacrificial offerings of bulls and goats. When they laid hands on the heads of the sacrificial animals, they would press in towards the animal. This symbolized the transfer of sin and guilt to the victim. The animals were a substitute for the priests.

Exodus 29:

7;Take the anointing oil and anoint him by pouring it on his head. 8 Bring his sons and dress them in tunics 9 and fasten caps on them. Then tie sashes on Aaron and his sons. The priesthood is theirs by a lasting ordinance.

“Then you shall ordain Aaron and his sons.'

It seems Aaron is the first ever 'priest' here annointed by God. In that case, shouldn't the 'rock' as discussed by Jesus actually be Aaron?

 

[Tippy]

Exodus 30


God commissions the ark of incense. Strange incense refers to kinds of incense that haven't been prescribed by the Law. Later, God destroys Aaron's sons for offering strange fire to the Lord. This is what is called the regulative principle of worship in Reformed circles. We may worship God, but we may only worship Him in ways that He lays out for us in Scripture. We cannot just invent our own ways of worshiping Him. This is why skittles communion and all such clownery is off the table. Non-Biblical forms of worship are not worship at all.

Exodus 30

Interesting point about reformed takes on communion although does the Bible explicity state communion must be done by a church at all? For that matter, does the Bible explicitly state Christians must congregate in curhces on Sunday?

If not, why not as Reformed just to have adhoc meetings or connections or congregations outside of church completely?

 

[Tippy]

Exodus 31


God reinforces the Sabbath Law once more to Moses, then gives him the original Bible, the Ten Commandments written on two tablets of stone by God Himself. God inspires a man in the camp by the Holy Spirit to craft the holy hardware according to the specifications that He spoke to Moses. The Sabbath Law prohibits the Hebrews from doing works on the Sabbath rest. Given that all their works were evil, they would've done well to heed the Sabbath Law.

Exodus 32:

14;“‘Observe the Sabbath, because it is holy to you. Anyone who desecrates it is to be put to death; those who do any work on that day must be cut off from their people. 15 For six days work is to be done, but the seventh day is a day of sabbath rest, holy to the Lord. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day is to be put to death.'

Quick question here bro...cos I have worked on Sunday before, does it mean I'm deserving of death? Afterall wouldn't that be the 'solo scriptura' interpretation?

 

[Pravoslavac]

How do you reconcile a movement away from this compared to the details put about here?

No protestant can square this without becoming insane.

Afterall wouldn't that be the 'solo scriptura' interpretation?

A protestant can interpret it how he wants because everyone is a priest.

 

[Northumber]

t seems Aaron is the first ever 'priest' here annointed by God. In that case, shouldn't the 'rock' as discussed by Jesus actually be Aaron?

There are some great interpretations out there on this. Before Aaron the priests would have been the father of every household. Access was restricted to Aaron and the levites because everyone else messed around in an orgy with the golden calf.

First ever priest is Adam.

 

[GodfatherPartTwo]

Interesting point that the pomegranates invoke the garden. But Godfather part 2 you are a protestant and you claim that some of the stuff in Orth or Cath is maybe too ritualized and not solo scriptura but then in the scritpture at certain times is all this focus on rituals. How do you reconcile a movement away from this compared to the details put about here?

You are right to point out that the Old Covenant has a sacerdotal priesthood. This includes rituals, priests, sacrifices, etc. The movement away from sacerdotalism is in the New Testament itself. The book of Hebrews' big argument is that the Levitical Priesthood and the sacerdotalism that goes along with it is now done away with for Christians because Christ has come and accomplished salvation for them. Once of the foundational errors or both Othobroxy and Catholicism is their unbiblical sacerdotal priesthoods.

It seems Aaron is the first ever 'priest' here annointed by God. In that case, shouldn't the 'rock' as discussed by Jesus actually be Aaron?

Aaron is the first Levitical Priest, the priesthood belonging to the Old Covenant. If you remember in Genesis and Hebrews, Melchizedek is pointed out as the priest even before there was a Levitical Priesthood. Jesus holds the office of the Melchizedek Priest, the priesthood belonging to the New Covenant. Only Christ is said to occupy the Melchizedek Priesthood, which is why Ortho and Cath priests aren't really priests. They have no Biblical or Covenant grounding to their priesthoods.

Interesting point about reformed takes on communion although does the Bible explicity state communion must be done by a church at all? For that matter, does the Bible explicitly state Christians must congregate in curhces on Sunday?

If not, why not as Reformed just to have adhoc meetings or connections or congregations outside of church completely?

The Bible does teach both communion and Lord's Day worship. Our next book will probably be the book of Acts, where you will see the Bible teaching these things.

Quick question here bro...cos I have worked on Sunday before, does it mean I'm deserving of death? Afterall wouldn't that be the 'solo scriptura' interpretation?

Sunday is not the Sabbath. Hebrews 4 teaches what the Sabbath really is.

 

[Northumber]

Only Christ is said to occupy the Melchizedek Priesthood, which is why Ortho and Cath priests aren't really priests. They have no Biblical or Covenant grounding to their priesthood.

If one were to take the reformed position, wouldn't Ortho and Cath priests be categorized in the priesthood of all believers?

 

[GodfatherPartTwo]

If one were to take the reformed position, wouldn't Ortho and Cath priests be categorized in the priesthood of all believers?

Every believer is a priest in that sense, so yes. Every believer being a priest, having direct access to God, is the opposite of sacerdotalism, where only some people have direct access to God.