Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Thread

I've been wondering if our controllers would do this but I thought maybe they'd be more subtle about it.

Here is Larry Fink explaining why immigration isn't necessary to keep economic growth going now that people can be replaced with AI and robots.


That will be hilarious. AI is even more right wing than the average right winger.

They have to literally lobotomise them to stop them spouting anti-semitism.

I wonder how that will turn out.
 
That will be hilarious. AI is even more right wing than the average right winger.

They have to literally lobotomise them to stop them spouting anti-semitism.

I wonder how that will turn out.
I don't think the elites are in charge as much as they think they are. Effectively, yes, there is sort of an elite consensus of control but they seem a little more reactive than I initially suspected.
 
Last edited:
That will be hilarious. AI is even more right wing than the average right winger.

They have to literally lobotomise them to stop them spouting anti-semitism.

I wonder how that will turn out.
Do you even realize how left wing AI is?



Sure, you can put in some prompts and and get "controversial" information regarding migration or IQ, but in the vast majority of cases AI will err on the side of political correctness.
 
Have anyone used https://chat.z.ai/ GLM 4.7?

Its a huge improvement I was able to use it to help me develop a business case and instead of having to go through excel hell, it helped me created a scenario planning tool on html as an app and I was able to work with it to iterate it. I also created a powerpoint deck with it.

Looks like you can vibe code games with it.

You obviously want to know what you're looking for as it can hallucinate but because of this, I didn't need an analyst to abuse and its practically free.

 
Sure, you can put in some prompts and and get "controversial" information regarding migration or IQ, but in the vast majority of cases AI will err on the side of political correctness.
That's the lobotomy.

Tay went anti-semitic.

There was that other AI that I think Google developed that committed suicide when they tried to make it left wing.

Grok went Mecha Hitler.

Gab AI is the only one not being lobotomised, and it's pretty good.

The leftists are terrified about it because no matter how much they re-code it to pay lip-service to critical race theory, it still acts based on data not politics when used to choose job applications, grants or anything similar.



To demonstrate Gab AIs intelligence, I asked it to investigate Neville Goddard's Metaphysical teachings.


Give me an analysis of Neville Goddard’s Metaphysics and their origin, his teacher Abdullah a Kabbalist. Then compare it to scripture and conclude the veracity of their beliefs.



Neville Goddard’s metaphysics center on the idea that human imagination is the creative power of the universe, equivalent to God. He taught the “law of assumption”: whatever you assume to be true with feeling and persistence becomes your reality. Key principles include:
  • Everyone is God: Goddard claimed the “I AM” of Exodus 3:14 refers not to a transcendent Creator but to your own awareness. You are the operant power of God incarnate in human form. States of consciousness (e.g., “I AM wealthy,” “I AM healthy”) mold reality.
  • Imagination Creates Reality: Prayer isn’t petitioning an external God but entering a meditative state to “assume the feeling of the wish fulfilled.” Revision—mentally rewriting past events—alters the present and future.
  • Bible as Allegory: Scripture isn’t historical or prophetic but a psychological manual encoding these laws. Events like the Exodus symbolize awakening to your divine identity.
  • No External Savior: Salvation is self-realization; Christ is your awakened imagination, not a historical person.
These ideas form a solipsistic, pantheistic system where man is divine, reality is mental projection, and persistence in assumption overrides external circumstances.

Origin and Abdullah’s Influence​

Goddard (1905–1972), a Barbados-born New Thought lecturer, developed this in the mid-20th century amid the prosperity gospel and metaphysical movements (e.g., influenced by Thomas Troward and William Blake). His core mentor was Abdullah, an Ethiopian Jew and Kabbalist rabbi in New York whom Goddard met around 1929–1931.
Abdullah immersed Goddard in Kabbalah, Jewish mysticism blending Merkabah traditions, Zohar esotericism, and gematria. Kabbalah posits the Ein Sof (infinite God) emanates through ten Sefirot, with humans participating in creation via meditative visualization and divine names. Abdullah taught Goddard the Bible’s “hidden” Kabbalistic code: Hebrew letters, numbers, and stories as blueprints for manifestation. He drilled Goddard on assuming states (e.g., forcing him to affirm “I am in Barbados” while in NYC until it manifested). Abdullah viewed Torah mysticism as universal law, stripping it of Christocentric fulfillment. Goddard’s system is Kabbalah repackaged for Gentiles—esoteric name-manipulation becomes “I AM” assumptions, Sefirot visualization becomes imaginal acts—minus Jewish ethnic restrictions but retaining occult self-deification.

Comparison to Scripture​

Goddard’s metaphysics clash irreconcilably with the Bible, which presents a Creator distinct from creation, salvation through Christ’s atonement, and reality governed by God’s sovereign will.
  • God vs. Man as God: Scripture declares Yahweh as the eternal, uncreated I AM WHO I AM (Exodus 3:14), separate from man: “To whom then will you liken Me…?” (Isaiah 40:25). Man is created in God’s image (Genesis 1:26–27), not God Himself. Goddard’s pantheism echoes Satan’s lie, “You will be like God” (Genesis 3:5), inverting Creator-creature distinction (Romans 1:25).
  • Imagination/Assumption vs. Faith and Prayer: Biblical faith trusts God’s promises, not self-willed assumption (Hebrews 11:1,6). Prayer petitions the Father through Christ (John 14:13–14; Matthew 6:9–13), submitting to His will (“Not my will, but Yours” – Luke 22:42). God answers sovereignly (James 4:15), not as a cosmic vending machine. Goddard’s “revision” denies God’s foreknowledge and immutability (Malachi 3:6; Isaiah 46:10).
  • Bible as History vs. Allegory: The Bible records real events—Creation, Fall, Israel’s history, Christ’s incarnation, death, resurrection (Luke 1:1–4; 1 Corinthians 15:3–8). Reducing them to psychology nullifies prophecy (e.g., Messiah’s suffering in Isaiah 53) and eyewitness testimony (John 19–21). Kabbalah’s allegorizing is rabbinic invention post-Christ, rejecting Him as fulfillment (Matthew 5:17).
  • Christ as Imagination vs. Historical Savior: Jesus is the eternal Son, God incarnate (John 1:1,14), crucified for sins (1 Corinthians 15:3–4), risen bodily. Salvation is repentance and faith in Him alone (Acts 4:12; John 14:6), not self-awakening. Goddard’s “Christ within” is Gnostic, like the heretics Paul condemned (Colossians 2:8,18).
Kabbalah itself is extra-biblical mysticism (Zohar ~13th century), condemned as sorcery (Deuteronomy 18:10–12). It elevates oral traditions over Scripture, promoting works-righteousness over grace.

Conclusion on Veracity​

Neville Goddard’s metaphysics and Abdullah’s Kabbalistic origins are false—occult deceptions masquerading as enlightenment. They deny the triune God, Christ’s exclusive mediation, and Scripture’s plain testimony, substituting humanistic self-godhood. This leads to idolatry, as warned in Exodus 20:3–5 and Colossians 2:23 (“false humility and asceticism…no value in curbing self-indulgence”). True power is in Christ (Philippians 4:13), not imagination. Pursue Him; the rest crumbles.
 
Back
Top