Candace Owens
- Thread starter It_Is_My_Time
- Start date
Let me ask a more fundamental question because I think we've lost the plot here: why are we listening to a black woman about anything intellectual? Seriously.
Last edited:
This guy sounds like a clown reading off his que cards. 4 months later and he's got some "fresh" take on Candice's take on Kirk. Genius insight. Hindsight is 20/20. The Kirk sh*t is peak Fed Op and Candace has come the closest to a true reveal. Sure, she's a clown black woman, but at least she's questioning the narrative. Again, Billy Corgan has seen someone shape shift, Tucker had claw marks on his ribcage from a demon, I've telepathically communicated with objects in the sky, yet Candace is called a nut bag for talking about other worldly phenomenon in regards to Kirk.
Boring. Let's get into some David Icke Lizard People sh*t. No one around here seems to have any better theories, except, "Meh, Somalis invading Minnesota, but can't figure out how and why?" It's other worldly demon sh*t we're experiencing. Get with the program.
Doug Wilson had you pegged two minutes into the video.
For a laugh or because you take it seriously?
I haven't followed her content the last few months, but from the stuff I've seen of her, she's been pretty solid.
It is also pretty clear that she's been the main target of ziocons, along with Tucker. She's been getting a lot of flack by flying close to the target.
What's kind of funny is that some guys saying she's a shill also believe Alex Jones isn't compromised.
I think that first part says it all. She started off pretty solid. The problem is when you go completely insane, which she has done in the last few months, it calls into question any of the legitimate points you've made prior. It's a self-defeating move in the long term.
Judoka
Catholic
I'm not typically a conspiracy theorist but this one seems quite clear to me. I get it, she's an unusual messenger and she's been wrong on a few things, but overall she has been courageous about investigating what feds won't investigate. Another person who is doing a good job is Baron Coleman.
I had a chance to see a bit of a video of his once, dude has no imagination, he claimed Jesus' disciples must have been taking notes as He was teaching them or others.
No imagination, as opposed to what? A time traveling Charlie Kirk who willingly sacrificed himself for the conservative movement?
Unlike Candace, Doug actually has skin in the game on the ground. He's not just a talking head. Also unlike Candace, he has people in D.C listening to his videos and attending his churches.
A standalone observation regarding a factoid he made up on the fly and believes in. Nothing related to Candace, I've never followed any of the commentators with dedicated threads.
Candace has given up her personal freedom and now requires 24/7 security due to the constant threats on her life. Now I'm not gonna sit here and say I know what and who Candace is. I don't. Maybe she's a fed? Maybe she's nuts? Who really knows? I don't know the lady and I'm not really sure what to think about the Kirk/time traveller statement? I suppose we'll have to wait for her to expand on that.
What I do know is that she says some far out sh*t regarding our collective enemies, the jews, pedophiles, satanic Hollywood, liberalism, corrupt political actors and organizations, etc., that nobody else seems to have the balls to say. Is what she says just bait and switch controlled op? If so, she is a fantastic actress.
Here she goes again talking about Courtney Love contacting her to discuss the elites taking control of people's lives (Cobain) and businesses when they get "too big."
People like Alex Jones, David Icke and Candace Jones do more damage than they do good because they often taint topics to which they give attention, and frequently they are topics others have already exposed.
Also, their alarmist nature and over-emotional delivery cultivate an unbalanced disposition in their audience.
I don't think their willingness to discuss weird possibilities is helpful. They don't have the foundation for it.
Also, their alarmist nature and over-emotional delivery cultivate an unbalanced disposition in their audience.
I don't think their willingness to discuss weird possibilities is helpful. They don't have the foundation for it.
Some insight about Candace here:
Regardless of what one thinks should happen or should've happened, these people are the ones who have broken through to the masses.
The question is are they controlled opposition or just truthful individuals being their authentic selves speaking what they believe to be the truth and are thus labeled unhinged nut bags because the truth itself is crazy and beyond normal human comprehension?
The willingness to discuss "weird" possibilities is essential right now because no other plausible explanations make sense. Kirk's assassination makes no sense. Trump's presidency that refuses to go scorched earth on non-white criminals and their supporters (like Tim Waltz) makes no sense. Germany being unable to raise an army because they are majority muzzy and don't want to train and put arms in the hands of jihadists makes no sense. Legal pornography and gambling makes no sense. Nick Fuentes blaming the jews for years and now telling his audience that they are "over-blaming" the jews makes no sense. And the list goes on and on.
Maybe it's time to start exploring clown explanations to explain "up is down and down is up" clown world? Nothing else seems to make any sense except, "This is all the jews doing as they work for satan, hate Christ, and are actively using talmudic black magic to destroy Christianity and all that it stands for."
This guy needs to do a physiognomy break down on his goatee
Candace exposing more globohomo jewry in the form of Dave Rubin and Peter Thiel:
The social acceptance of faggots is mind boggling.