36 Chambers Of Fertilizer
- Thread starter Wutang
- Start date
So who are these people? The general reaction you get on here is either people clowning on you or being confused whenever you write a post making delusional claims about China invading Ireland and other delusional takes. You've kept saying for a while that there's this circle of people on the forum seeking you out for guidance who you are mentoring but I don't see this happening at all from reading what goes in this forum. Rather it's either people pointing out how unmoored to reality your takes are or if they aren't writing a post themselves, liking the posts eviscerating your attempts to 'awaken people'. You've also gotten banned twice on this forum and have mods continue to try and steer you in the right direction which you continue to disregard.
Despite all the negative feedback from both regular posters and mods on this forum you continue to think you are some sort of guru with disciples that can wait until you drop your next black pill. This is just further evidence of your complete inability to read the room which goes back to your social skills being decayed from your isolation and also your poor judgement not just in political affairs but in general since you can't seem to interpret the information you have before you in the correct way.
You can read the threads, you can see who likes posts I make, you can probably figure it out.
I have no idea why you waste so much energy trying to combat my red pill knowledge. But it only motivates me more to keep helping others.
This is a tremendous video! I recommend everybody watch it!
There is a middle ground here. I have liked some of IIMTs posts occasionally he does say things I agree with. That being said I disagree with him more often than I agree and I certainly don’t consider him some type of guru but I feel it would be going to far to say that he is always wrong or all of his posts are garbage.
I tend to agree with IIMT. I do not think Trump is a good leader. I do not think the solution to much of society's woes will come through politics. Nor do I think that who you vote for does anything to change the course of this country. That said, IIMT tends to oversell his point. He is also very defensive. When he gets into this mode, he comes across as very bizarre.
I actually don't criticize his anti-Trump posts so much and neither do most of his other critics do except for maybe the exception of Get2choppa. Rather it's the bizarre takes such as the upcoming China invasion of Ireland even though they aren't bothering to do anything with the weaker countries that are right next to them or how Tel Aviv will vanish from the map due to Iranian strikes even though Iran cant even stop Israel from violating their airspace at will. There's plenty of other people here for criticize Trump on this forum and if anything being anti-Trump is the majority view now here but those people don't get the pushback IIMT does since they don't get into bizzaro land in the way he does.
As for politics, I do think politics matter but more important behind this there needs to be some sort of spiritual revival and a change of the hearts of the public. IIMT seems to completely disregard the spiritual side of things and has essentially an atheistic view of the world which he was more expressive of in the past but then he toned down after getting criticism. That is why he'll sprinkle his posts with references to God and the opposition being "satanic" even though his ultimate solution is completely secular. Fascism is his true religion which is why he'll say things such as preferring European Muslims over African Christians and why in the past he'll say church won't save you though he did start hiding his power level on this more once people called him out on that.
As for politics, I do think politics matter but more important behind this there needs to be some sort of spiritual revival and a change of the hearts of the public. IIMT seems to completely disregard the spiritual side of things and has essentially an atheistic view of the world which he was more expressive of in the past but then he toned down after getting criticism. That is why he'll sprinkle his posts with references to God and the opposition being "satanic" even though his ultimate solution is completely secular. Fascism is his true religion which is why he'll say things such as preferring European Muslims over African Christians and why in the past he'll say church won't save you though he did start hiding his power level on this more once people called him out on that.
Last edited:
What he was saying about Tel Aviv is a prime example of him overselling his point. I haven't paid as much attention to his takes on China. I think it's obvious that China is gearing up for some kind of play in decades time. They have plenty of problems at home, but they're too ambitious for their own good. Only time will tell on that one. As for Trump, IIMT was long ahead of the curve on what is now the majority view, but his overselling of his points can have an alienating effect on people who are even sympathetic to his views. I can only imagine how much more alienating this would be to people who are less inclined to agree with his takes.
He treats the solution as though it were a political mechanism instead of a spiritual revival; he is ultimately coming from a political paradigm, not a spiritual one. To me, he is such a known quantity for this that to criticize him for it would be akin to being mad at a dog for barking. I agree that his views on church are wanting. That said, he no longer champions his anti-church rhetoric around here, so I'll give him credit for sticking to his lane.
He treats the solution as though it were a political mechanism instead of a spiritual revival; he is ultimately coming from a political paradigm, not a spiritual one. To me, he is such a known quantity for this that to criticize him for it would be akin to being mad at a dog for barking. I agree that his views on church are wanting. That said, he no longer champions his anti-church rhetoric around here, so I'll give him credit for sticking to his lane.
My take on China is simple. Human history boils down to just one thing, the stronger civilization takes the land. Land if the most valuable asset that humans can possess in the material/physical world. At the end of the day, land is the only thing that matters. And 10's of millions of men, maybe hundreds of millions, have been slaughtered in the pursuit or defense of land. There is no denying this fact.
Right now, China is stronger that the USA. But right now China is not strong enough to cross the ocean and take the land of the west, as the Europeans did 400 years ago. It would be far too costly and they would likely lose, or if they did win, it would cost them so dearly their flank would be exposed. So, with that said, China is not coming today or tomorrow, or probably in my lifetime.
But the trajectory of the west .v China is also undeniable. Even Jensen Huang said China is going to win the AI race, and everyone is now realizing AI is the new arms race. To put it bluntly, even Jensen Huang realizes China is going to win on the biggest battlefield. China is growing powerful because they have a high IQ population, without third world immigration, and the west is now too weak to keep their boot on China's neck. The opium wars that the Europeans fought against China, kept China held down for a long time, but they have recovered and now the west, due to third world immigration can no longer hold China back. At the same time, the west is collapsing at an alarming rate. Look at all the Indian scams taking place, and now we have the Somalian scams. And is anything even being done about it? No, in fact your "based" president and his "conservative" party are passing a budget to spend billions to bring MORE of these people into the USA. The problem is only going to get drastically worse.
So, in due time, 30, 50, 100 years, I don't know when, China will have advanced robotics and drones, all which can cross the ocean with minimum human risk and fight wars for them. In that same time the USA will go from a super majority White country, high trust, full of high IQ/creative/hard working people, into a country that is...
35% White and hates this country for the discrimination it faces within it daily and has given up on it.
35% Hispanic with a 90 IQ.
20% African with a 85 IQ.
And an Indian ruling class pillaging what is left of the USA and sending it all back to India.
With these groups not getting along, technology will come to a complete stop and reversal as infrastructure crumbles. Do you honestly think a USA with those demographics and an average IQ in the upper 80's has a fighting chance against what China is putting together? Do you honestly think these demographics can build the 50+ new nuclear power plants needed for the AI race? No one in their right mind thinks that it would, it would be insane to believe that version of the USA, the one being created right now, could put up a fight.
I agree with much of what IIMT says but I don't quite believe that it is a real person saying it. The IIMT account is most likely some kind of AI "contrarian" bot sent here to sow division and poison the well. Something it does quite effectively. This is why he refuses to be vetted in person and has "no interest in meeting anyone from this forum." If you take a good look at his posting style, the inability to process humor or be funny in the slightest way, the drab and emotionless lack of human spiritually in his posts, the repetitive "I'm going to beat this point into your head until you align with me," the drive you crazy "I didn't say that" goal post shifting, as well as the quite obvious exaggerations about his wealth, work schedule, and strength of morals as a man who can easily date beautiful American white women 20 years his junior yet chooses to remain single, there is no doubt that something just doesn't add up.
Either this, or he is in fact a "man" who often lies or exaggerates the truth on internet forums in pursuit of validation and attention in the form of likes from other men.
And so, whether IIMT is a human or a bot, the issue becomes that he has no ability to read the room and will not stop preaching to the choir. Not only that, he does it and nauseum repeating the same thing over and over as if we didn't hear him the first time. In essence he has no respect for his intellectual equals, much less his intellectual superiors, and hence very little respect for this forum. We are just a "sound board" here to absorb his every whim and jolly. Every "idea" he has is someone else's. He has no unique or original thoughts. Everything is "from the guys I read." In addition, he is on the internet at all times while claiming to work 80 hour plus weeks at multiple jobs which means he most likely posts and does his research from "the guys he listens to" on the clock which, if true, would make him a thief of his employer's time (and money).
Furthermore, he is the problem he complains so much about. He lived with a Chinese roommate for 10 years, hence he harbours The Enemy. He works in corporate America and hordes 401K money like a jew. He complains about the browning of America, usury, and immigration yet lives with non-white men while investing his entire multi-million dollar fortune in usurious jew banks and monetary instruments.
The "guy" is a plague upon this forum and I am accusing him of being a liar, a thief, and an atheistic troll claiming to be a Christian for political expediency and internet browny points. He is also consistently low key calling for violence against The American State, but is too much of a coward to just come out and say it.
All of these are perma-ban offenses.
I don't think IIMT is a literal bot but he is spiritually a bot. I think his lack of sense of humor and his robotic ability to shrug off all criticisms with a 'thank you' and continue to see the things the way he wants despite him getting constant negative feedback as if he is following an algorithm goes back to what something I've said many times before: his social isolation. It's something that he always dismisses as a irrelevant personal attack but it's very relevant in that I think it's the source of a lot of his bad takes and why he grates on both regular posters ; outside of his small fan club that is - no surprise - made up of the other posters on this forum that have similar issues that he does and who the mods have to slap around to keep them in line. When your only interactions with other humans are either online or the one off conversations you have with patrons then it becomes hard to read social cues such as jokes, innuendos, inferences, how people are reacting to you etc.
It also affects your ability to gauge how the general public is feeling. If you don't have actual relationships in the offline world and your only social interactions are from your customers asking for a refill and your gauge of what the average person is thinking are from 'based' podcasts and the replies to based X accounts (reminder: these people are not your average normie) then it means your political takes will be completely off since they aren't based actual on what is going on in boots on the ground reality.
It also affects your ability to gauge how the general public is feeling. If you don't have actual relationships in the offline world and your only social interactions are from your customers asking for a refill and your gauge of what the average person is thinking are from 'based' podcasts and the replies to based X accounts (reminder: these people are not your average normie) then it means your political takes will be completely off since they aren't based actual on what is going on in boots on the ground reality.
Simple "yes" or "no" question for you.
Will a USA that will one day be 35% White, 35% Hispanic, 20% African, and run by Middle Managers from India, over the course of time, as time changes technology, be able to compete with China?
I'm trying to show IIMT isn't a bot but he isn't helping matters by following his usual algorithm of trying to drive every conversation into the topics that are programmed into his source code: "do you think Trump will save us" 'will China turn 80 IQ foreigners into fertilizer" and ad nauseum.
So, you refuse to answer, which is the most telling. You have a severe aversion to this topic, and that reason is something you need to address for your own psychological reason. This is a large conative dissonance, and you would be best off to either just put me on your ignore list, so I don't cause you more trauma, or look into it more on your own. This is sincerely the best advice I can give to you. And this is a great reason why I don't take your opinion seriously; this is not the behavior of someone I seek out for advice.
IIMT now executing his newest subroutine; when you refuse to participate in his initial subroutine he will default to trying to psychoanalyze you and claim he is trying to give you advice even when he has no real world experiences to base his advice on. You would be in better shape to give advice on addressing psychological issues if you would apply to this advice to yourself and think about why you have engaged in so much unusual behavior through out your life such as working 80 hours a week, replacing human relationships with para social relationships with guys talking for 7 hours on podcasts and why you think people can't form families without being a millionaire. I would suggest you look into why you are psychologically prone to such risk aversion behavior and work through how it has affected your mental state in other ways. Perhaps there's other trauma you have experienced in your own life that you can overcome which assist you into finally integrating with the society around you
Last edited:
All you had to do was say "yes" or "no", but I expected you to respond exactly how you did. A wall of text full of personal insults. This isn't healthy.
Please fix your own psychological issues before you start worrying about the mental state of others. You are in no position to determine what is mentally healthy or not. Let me guess ,your algorithm is going to have your next post be about 'this is just a bad look', another attempt at psychology analysis, or a irrelevant question about Trump or China invading?
I think he has too much of an ego to be a literal bot. An AI chat bot wouldn't defend it's reputation like how IIMT does. The thought is hilarious though. As for the things you've mentioned, some of those can simply be chalked up to Stoicism's deadening effect on the soul. IIMT has touted a Stoic outlook before.
I am stoic, in that I avoid pleasure and it has brought great happiness and connection to my life. I would suggest it for every man, though it isn't easy to get started, it takes time and weening off pleasure in pursuit of a higher purpose and connection with God.
I responded to you earlier, do you now see why I think China will one day own this land?