Jay Dyer Thread

Like I've stated before, Jay shadow banned me for not agreeing with him in the YouTube comment section but so has Nick Rochefort (or that mod guy more likely) for not agreeing with him during one of his real estate streams... It's all a big show be careful what you consume.
 
What I don't like is someone like Sam claiming that he can predict that Jay will get divorced by his wife even though "he's not wishing it on him." That's just mental illness, or worse, right there. Prelest possibly, and I really hope not.
Sam is a master of plausible deniability. What I like about him is that he'll openly admit to being "scummy" which is something he has over Dyer. He never pretends to take the moral high ground. What I don't like is that he doesn't seem to think that it's something that Christians should be sanctified out of. There's a certain reverence you have to bring to the table given the subject matter. As for why he is the way he is, he seems to be naturally mistrusting of people in general, perhaps he got burned pretty bad in the past. I wouldn't want to get near him. Not for fear of "getting owned" or whatever, but because I don't think he can disagree with someone and leave it at that, but would start flying off at the mouth and say things that aren't good for anyone to hear or even for the one saying it to say.
 
As for why he is the way he is, he seems to be naturally mistrusting of people in general, perhaps he got burned pretty bad in the past.
I think you've analyzed him pretty well.

I give the benefit of the doubt to a lot of guys that have the types of personality we have, even if abrupt or abrasive, because God knows I've been that way before. The thing that's different and shapes my view of things is that I have to know the person is big picture acting in good faith. The reason I have confidence I do is because I paid a lot of dues for professional reasons and don't actually take myself all that seriously in the larger sense. That can't really come off on the internet, as I am more entertained by quasi trolling here and there, and have a good amount of disdain for types that can't see anything currently or off into the future, but either claim they do or don't give credit to others who clearly have shown they do. Misplaced ego is what I'm talking about, it's a particular type of ego that not all that special, or skilled, leftists classically have. It's worse in some of my professional circles where the people think that because they attained a degree or a job that pays more money than most, it makes their (largely first order or stale, dumb) opinions special.
 
Jay himself said he writes for the Sam Hyde show (Sam's personal YouTube account), not MDE.
Confirmed, he did.

 
Is it just me, or has debating Copts and Hotep Negroes shartpened Jay's racial views?

I saw some of his recent streams and went "woah, boy, slow down there". I mean, I like it, but it's funny , I thought he was committed to be somewhat milquetoast on the issue.
 


Looks like Lyer has run from another debate. The guy intentionally sabatoges any potential debates then gaslights his low-IQ followers into thinking that his opponent is the one running from the debate. What's amazing is that he has a pattern of doing it and his cult following still hasn't noticed.
 
Looks like Lyer has run from another debate. The guy intentionally sabatoges any potential debates then gaslights his low-IQ followers into thinking that his opponent is the one running from the debate. What's amazing is that he has a pattern of doing it and his cult following still hasn't noticed.
Like that would've done anything... Debating Prots is like beating a dead horse because no man will save that doomed heresy.
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure anyone can call in and debate him on his livestreams. Including protestants.
His discord "debates" are a joke. Why are they a joke? Because he's also the moderator. This is no different than a shock jock hitting mute on his opponent whenever they are making a point. The reason this chump is afraid to do a real moderated debate is because he knows he won't be able to steer the conversation into his own self-affirming circular arguments. Case in point, the time he got smoked by Erick Ybarra when he called into his show and when he lost to Trent Horn in one of the few moderated debates he's done (even though he had the winning thesis). It doesn't take a genius to see that he is already over his own gimmick and is now branching out into the broader political arena to grow his following.

 
Sedevacantists? XD You just lost it.

Those tweets sum up the cluelessness of the author.
Wild to see him admit that his own church is infiltrated by homosexuals, feminists, and heretics.
It's wild that someone would think that a church of sinners would be completely free from members who fall into sin and need healing. It's a spiritual arena where the outcome is not certain until we are dead. What's crazy is the prots who think they win salvation like a lottery ticket and after they can just lounge and drool and even fall into pedophilia, doesn't matter because they are already 'saved'. Insane.
 
Last edited:
What's crazy is the prots who think they win salvation like a lottery ticket and after they can just lounge and drool and even fall into pedophilia, doesn't matter because they are already 'saved'.
The nice thing about being a Protestant is that I don't have to cover up for pedophiles and homosexuals since I don't have some "charism of infallibility" myth to uphold. So pointing out that there's pedophile Prot pastors doesn't sting as much as pointing out that there's pedophile Ortho priests, who you have to run cover for. Unlike in Orthobroxy, I have the means to go after subversives like these.
 
Back
Top