Nick Fuentes Thread

Shaquilleoatmeal said:
Where did he promote the Jan 6 storming? I just googled it and found nothing.
Click to expand...


From the video. I like listening to Fuentes bytheway, he's ad hoc, sharp, a fast learner, intelligent and not easily turned by social pressure. But you have to be aware of his personal history, which is shady at times.

“Keep moving towards the Capitol. It appears we are taking the Capitol. Keep marching, and don’t relent. Never relent. Break down the barriers and disregard the police. The Capitol belongs to us now. … Now we are forcibly evicting them [politicians] from the People's house!”
 
LaAguilaNegra said:


From the video. I like listening to Fuentes bytheway, he's ad hoc, sharp, a fast learner, intelligent and not easily turned by social pressure. But you have to be aware of his personal history, which is shady at times.

“Keep moving towards the Capitol. It appears we are taking the Capitol. Keep marching, and don’t relent. Never relent. Break down the barriers and disregard the police. The Capitol belongs to us now. … Now we are forcibly evicting them [politicians] from the People's house!”
Click to expand...

This is the only clip of Fuentes outside, where he says this one time to go into the Capitol, but Fuentes never went in. On Fuentes' livestream on the day after, he advised everyone to not post social media of themselves inside the Capitol and also told everyone live on air to delete their photos.

If you look at the other known feds/informants/provocateurs present on that day, like Ray Epps and John Earle Sullivan / Jayden X, these being the two who physically intersected next to Baked Alaska (later made a plea deal and became an informant), who was questioning Ray Epps on livestream and later entered the Capitol himself, when Epps repeatedly said to go into the Capitol, you see a total contrast in their behavior on the days before, the day of, and the days after.

Antifa organizer Sullivan was the one who just happened to be standing next to Ashley Babbit and filmed her on his livestream being murdered.

When I compare Fuentes to these other known feds/informants, I think Fuentes just looks like someone who supported Trump and made one unwise comment in the heat of the moment.

As Fuentes said in the interview with Piers and elsewhere over the years, he testified under oath that he has never had any contact whatsoever with federal law enforcement.
 
Read_Lives_of_Saints said:
This is the only clip of Fuentes outside, where he says this one time to go into the Capitol, but Fuentes never went in. On Fuentes' livestream on the day after, he advised everyone to not post social media of themselves inside the Capitol and also told everyone live on air to delete their photos.

If you look at the other known feds/informants/provocateurs present on that day, like Ray Epps and John Earle Sullivan / Jayden X, these being the two who physically intersected next to Baked Alaska (later made a plea deal and became an informant), who was questioning Ray Epps on livestream and later entered the Capitol himself, when Epps repeatedly said to go into the Capitol. Antifa organizer Sullivan was the one who just happened to be standing next to Ashley Babbit and filmed her on his livestream being murdered.

When I compare Fuentes to these other known feds/informants, I think Fuentes just looks like someone who supported Trump and made one unwise comment in the heat of the moment.

As Fuentes said in the interview with Piers and elsewhere over the years, he testified under oath that he has never had any contact whatsoever with federal law enforcement.
Click to expand...
That doesn't disproves anything. It's just a matter of if you trust his assertions or not.

Personally I'm not sold on Nick.

How can others say Tucker is a handler and get miraculously Fuentes isn't controlled yet allowed to rise to the top of the Internet..

I'm just questioning some layers of how organic it is. And his Kanye shit show was a total psyop designed to detract and demoralize.

Even when I do agree with a lot of his points.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
www.rollingstone.com

The War Over Nick Fuentes Is Over. He Won

Nick Fuentes landed more conservative media appearances after the right tore itself apart over Tucker Carlson's interview with the white nationalist.
www.rollingstone.com www.rollingstone.com

What are your opinions on piers morgan virgin shaming him? We all know Fuentes could get laid if he wants, so doesn’t that make Piers Morgan look pathetic?
Click to expand...
I have come to realize, boomer and older X liberal men, are often liberal just because they are weak and think getting laid is what life is all about. They have no other purpose than to get laid. And in their time, to get laid, you had to follow the rules. That was it, they followed the rules, repeated the lies and allowed civilization to be destroyed, all so they could get laid. I stay away from men like this, they are no different than any other drug addict, just their addiction is legal, but equally disgusting.

They can't understand young men no longer have this option. Even if they wanted to get laid, just following the rules and letting women run roughshod over you, will not get you laid in this day and age. Young women are complete monsters and most young men want little to do with them., For "men" like Piers, this is sacrilegious, you are pointing out their entire reason for being is pointless. That is why he got so upset and kept going on about it.

I, like so often, wish I could be interviewed by people like him to set him straight on this issue. #1) Making getting laid the top priority of your life just makes you another drug addict. #2) The easy life you had as a youngster is long gone and your faux social shaming doesn't do any good at all, just pisses off more young men to follow guys like Nick.

You can't shame people into fitting into a civilization that you destroyed by chasing women, like a true coward.

 
It_Is_My_Time said:
I have come to realize, boomer and older X liberal men, are often liberal just because they are weak and think getting laid is what life is all about. They have no other purpose than to get laid. And in their time, to get laid, you had to follow the rules. That was it, they followed the rules, repeated the lies and allowed civilization to be destroyed, all so they could get laid. I stay away from men like this, they are no different than any other drug addict, just their addiction is legal, but equally disgusting.

They can't understand young men no longer have this option. Even if they wanted to get laid, just following the rules and letting women run roughshod over you, will not get you laid in this day and age. Young women are complete monsters and most young men want little to do with them., For "men" like Piers, this is sacrilegious, you are pointing out their entire reason for being is pointless. That is why he got so upset and kept going on about it.

I, like so often, wish I could be interviewed by people like him to set him straight on this issue. #1) Making getting laid the top priority of your life just makes you another drug addict. #2) The easy life you had as a youngster is long gone and your faux social shaming doesn't do any good at all, just pisses off more young men to follow guys like Nick.

You can't shame people into fitting into a civilization that you destroyed by chasing women, like a true coward.

Click to expand...

Deep down there's a real man in there.

He's just buried behind the public display of a man with low self esteem and tolerance for a woman who puts him below her on social agendas.


Everyone knows men and women can't be friends. It's impossible.

 
Excessive swearing -1. Keep your language clean.
It_Is_My_Time said:
I have come to realize, boomer and older X liberal men, are often liberal just because they are weak and think getting laid is what life is all about. They have no other purpose than to get laid. And in their time, to get laid, you had to follow the rules. That was it, they followed the rules, repeated the lies and allowed civilization to be destroyed, all so they could get laid. I stay away from men like this, they are no different than any other drug addict, just their addiction is legal, but equally disgusting.

They can't understand young men no longer have this option. Even if they wanted to get laid, just following the rules and letting women run roughshod over you, will not get you laid in this day and age. Young women are complete monsters and most young men want little to do with them., For "men" like Piers, this is sacrilegious, you are pointing out their entire reason for being is pointless. That is why he got so upset and kept going on about it.

I, like so often, wish I could be interviewed by people like him to set him straight on this issue. #1) Making getting laid the top priority of your life just makes you another drug addict. #2) The easy life you had as a youngster is long gone and your faux social shaming doesn't do any good at all, just pisses off more young men to follow guys like Nick.

You can't shame people into fitting into a civilization that you destroyed by chasing women, like a true coward.

Click to expand...

And know what else is weird, those same men who care about getting laid will look down on men fucking using money while praising men for fucking garbage tier women like landwhales for “free”.
 
It's true that the level of discourse and tone of speaking is lower than previous generations and sounds improper to people, like Piers Morgan, who understand the necessity of maintaining institutional respect, but that is because the level of propaganda (brainwashing) has risen so high that it's mostly the Groypers and spergs, who have so many issues, and that were anomalous to the systems of mind control, who are the ones able to challenge the false dichotomies entrenched within the attitudes of those who fear our roguish influence upon their social mores.

We love Nick because he's right and he's entertaining while swiftly, but perhaps indecorously, cutting through the decades of propagandistic lies that we've been force fed our whole lives.

The people who are opposed to Groypers are not any more eloquent than Nick in their proclamations and they almost always refuse to engage with the arguments, and when they do, they come off like Piers, browbeating, lecturing and trying to pull rank.

They almost never reach out a hand as a mentor or a peer, but more often as an enforcer of the orthodoxy of social mores that we interpret as both anti-traditional and having a subversive trajectory.

Mass immigration is a good example because the social mores of anti-racism and white guilt from Holocaust dogma were the propaganda paving stones of this pathway to white genocide that Nick mentioned during the interview with Piers.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
To which there was no response. So this is what I would call “cowering like a bitch.”
Click to expand...
Nick has said men desiring sex, especially to the point of ruin, is homosexual. He is right, lust is homosexual. Love should be a higher plan, bring both to a higher existence and the sex will create life. Just desiring sex, whether straight or gay, is the same, it is lust and it is degenerate behavior.
 
It_Is_My_Time said:
Nick has said men desiring sex, especially to the point of ruin, is homosexual. He is right, lust is homosexual. Love should be a higher plan, bring both to a higher existence and the sex will create life. Just desiring sex, whether straight or gay, is the same, it is lust and it is degenerate behavior.
Click to expand...
It’s worth noting that lust within marriage isn’t a bad thing though, and nick shaming fornication shouldn’t be conflated with him calling marriage homosexual.
 
Get2choppaaa said:
Why do I have to constantly respond to your nonsensical assertions when you're making them out of ignorance?

Why haven't you addressed the fact that you constantly make accusations about things you have not seen or are ignorant of. The amount of poo flinging you constantly do is akin to a retarded kid running around sans diaper smearing shit on the wall only to cry because your bum bum is nakey and you no likey.

You sir are out of your element.



I can have the opinion that Nick is a closet fag.

I can also believe he's a fed.

I can also think he did a good job against Cuck Morgan.
Click to expand...

Who on the right do you think is not a "Fed"? And I hope your list doesn't include people who are not only allowed large platforms but also backed by big conservative donors.
 
It_Is_My_Time said:
Isn't he the guy that talks constantly about Muslims, but not about the people who opened the doors and brought them here?
Click to expand...
Not sure about that...doesn't sound like him though he doesn't care for muzzies I'm sure. But you can get his IQ supplement and he posts a weekly analysis Monday on YouTube called "highly respected" he's previously had on Nick before it came to light among those circles that he's like fed captured.

Hes on point about 95 percent of the time.

I'm still a fan of Steve Bannon. The dude literally went to jail for the populist right wing cause over the bullshit Jan 6 contempt charge.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
Where did he say being married was gay? Evidence needed.
Click to expand...

I found some quotes and videos of Nick saying things like "dating women is gay". This is what people are probably referring to. In Nick's defense he may just be being hyperbolic here. Being a virgin as a guy is not a great position to defend out there in "the world".

I'm only posting the quotes here. Videos are easy to find but I just can't stand posting them because the ones I found are clipped with liberals giving terrible takes on what Nick is saying:

Here they are:
"Not only is that thinking (that he is gay because he doesn’t have a gilrfriend) flawed, but actually it’s the reverse. That actually makes me really more heterosexual,”

“If we’re really being honest, never having a girlfriend, never having sex with a woman really makes you more heterosexual because honestly, dating women is gay. having sex with women is gay. And having sex with men is gay and it’s really all gay.”

“the only really straight heterosexual position is to actualy ‘incel'. "

Did he specifically say marriage is gay? not that I could find. Did he say having sex with a woman was gay? yes. So, take what you will from that.
 
Anyone that hears "having sex with women is gay" and doesn't immediately recognize that as the hook to a joke is, like Piers, either playing dumb or actually dumb.

Hedonism is gay. Living only to indulge in pleasures is effeminate. Self-indulgence is basically the defining personality trait of homosexuals. That's pretty obviously the point. I don't know if this is some generational divide, if older guys just can't compute gen Z humor or what but I'm baffled every time I have to explain this one.

It feels like this:



'But having sex with women is straight....😟'

It's ok Limmy, don't worry about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top