This is a little bit more macro, but you'll see what it is getting at. From one of the better posters around.
This is a little bit more macro, but you'll see what it is getting at. From one of the better posters around.
Quantitative tightening ended.Hmm, what's happening now?
![]()
Did you read it? It was pretty clear.But what does it all mean?
I don't think even trying to help you is reasonable any longer, if you are this detached from reality.Meanwhile, back at the ranch, there has been no on the ground discernable difference in the quality of life on American soil the entire time. If anything it has improved. That is if you are a lower middle class non-striver optimist who doesn't live his life trying to keep up with the Jones's while trying to "get somewhere" financially.
Heard on Mailbag Monday podcast that Strike will introduce lines of credit soon. That is going to be nice, instead of having to take out longer term loans, or sell bitcoin to pay bills (realizing capital gains) just have a rolling line of credit! That line can then be paid off with regular 12 month loans (or whatever).
That will be how I pay bills as soon as it comes out going forward.
its what free market interest rate is...For every dollar you get a loan, you need $2 in bitcoin. Margin call at 65%. 13% APR.
Seems like garbage to me.
A "good" interest rate of 7% is only possible because banks don't need to actually lend the money, they create it as a balance sheet entry and collect the rent on it (without lending any actual money)
Such drawdown is nothing for asset appreciating much faster than anything else.That's never happened before
FUD city, lol (MSCI is an index for foreign investors, btw)
Bitcoin maxis discovering rolling debt financing reminds me of gamblers discovering the Martingale strategy. Both sound great on paper, both will blow up spectacularly in practice.Thinking in bitcoin terms, the value of the loan decreases over time (like a mortgage but faster.) For easy math, lets say a $100,000 loan with 2 BTC collateral. At maturity in 12 months, $113,000 is due. An average bitcoin year is 50% increase in fiat price. To repay the loan, a new loan using only 1.506 BTC is taken out. 1 of those BTC was bought using the previous loan...you only need 0.5. The next year, it gets even cheaper, until its a miniscule amount.
You're so close to understanding why Bitcoin cannot actually be lended, therefore cannot function as a currency, and why Strategy's endgame of being a "Bitcoin bank" is utter foolishness (hazard a guess as to why no one has invented a "gold bank" where you can borrow 10 oz. of gold and a year later repay with 11 oz. of gold). You understand how banks create money out of nothing, and are able to critique this system, but you haven't yet been able to wrap your head around the fact that this aspect of fiat also carries with it great advantages that Bitcoin (or gold) cannot replicate. There is a reason that no country in the world still uses a gold standard, and it's the same reason why no country in the world will ever adopt a Bitcoin standard. You're still operating under the false assumption that money = value. Once you internalize the idea that money is an entirely fictional social construct, whose only value is to facilitate economic exchange and allow for the accumulation and investment of capital (that is, real wealth, i.e. the sum of natural resources, human labor and applied knowledge) then you will be able to appreciate the virtues of fiat instead of focusing entirely on its flaws.A "good" interest rate of 7% is only possible because banks don't need to actually lend the money, they create it as a balance sheet entry and collect the rent on it (without lending any actual money)
money...real wealth, i.e. the sum of natural resources, human labor and applied knowledge
If a business makes money, it should be able to pay interest on a loan from a fully collateralized bank. Fractional reserve banking (counterfeiting) is only necessary for unprofitable business. Why do you think the S&P 500 growth matches the growth of the Federal Reserve balance sheet exactly? 493 companies out of 500 are simply receiving excess “liquidity” from the debauchment of fiat money, instead of creating wealth.Bitcoin maxis discovering rolling debt financing reminds me of gamblers discovering the Martingale strategy. Both sound great on paper, both will blow up spectacularly in practice.
You're so close to understanding why Bitcoin cannot actually be lended, therefore cannot function as a currency, and why Strategy's endgame of being a "Bitcoin bank" is utter foolishness (hazard a guess as to why no one has invented a "gold bank" where you can borrow 10 oz. of gold and a year later repay with 11 oz. of gold).
What rate of theft is necessary for civilization? 2%, 10%, 50%?You understand how banks create money out of nothing, and are able to critique this system, but you haven't yet been able to wrap your head around the fact that this aspect of fiat also carries with it great advantages that Bitcoin (or gold) cannot replicate.
Gold is saleable across time, but not across space, unless the gold becomes centralized. When things are centralized, they are more easily corrupted. Centralized gold —-> Fractional reserve banking ——> central banking ——> executive order 6102 —-> fiat slavery. Bitcoin does not require or even trend to centralization, it is to decentralization.There is a reason that no country in the world still uses a gold standard,