Saw Josiah Trenham promoting his church and insinuating that Kirk was an Orthodox prospect on Tucker's show. This is a good video to show Kirk for who he was:
Charlie Kirk Thread
- Thread starter Cooper
- Start date
Last edited:
Isn't that guy a homo?
*What I mean is, I hear so many stories about this Fuentes guy that I haven't got a clue which one is true.
Last edited:
Nick lecturing us on being over emotional and not blaming Israel for everything while talking to a shirtless Russell Brand
. What a homo.Complete garbage analysis by turn coat Nick who is obviously shaking in his boots and begging (((them))) to spare his life (either that or he is exposing himself as controlled opposition).
It's not necessarily "Israel" per se, it's the jews who control Israel and the American Deep State who fund Antifa and the jew brainwashing system of Hollywood liberal television, film, "news", and pornography, and who have pushed relentlessly for decades in the US for equal rights, feminism, immigration, faggotry, not punishing black crime, and who have used our public school system to push woke transgender ideology while using our tax dollars to fund transgender surgeries and hormone blockers on teenagers that we blame.
Nick also doesn't mention that Charlie Kirk, as a staunch conservative America First Christian was starting to turn on Israel. Charlie was just getting started on his JQ journey which is most likely why he is no longer with us. There is at least a 50/50 chance that if he would of accepted Bibi's 150 million, kicked Tucker off his platform, and never questioned Israel or zionism that he'd still be with us.
With (((them))) being primarily responsible for America's decline, and accepting zero responsibility for this decline, we must start proclaiming them guilty until they prove their innocence.
Last edited:
^ The controlled disinformation agents out in force.
So predictable and ghey.
So predictable and ghey.
I have a generally pessimistic view in the mid-to-long term. The system we live in was solidified after WW2. And Israel is integral to that. We are talking about the functioning of the entire modern world at this point.
I currently see it as similar to covid where sometimes it seems like we should have enough people to move the needle but the machine rumbles on. I have a feeling the people who are allowed to push the boundaries now are allowed/able to do so in order to let off steam, to release pressure. It's being implemented in a way that functions sort of like entertainment. This may be cynical of me to think but I believe the forces at work now are incredibly depraved and would take sick pleasure in having this amount of control - to make everything that could be good instead be confused, fake, artificial, and sully it all, making things meaningless. Put us in despair.
Why is Russell Brand not wearing a shirt? Why wouldn't Fuentes tell him to put one on?
Funny how this premise isn't shown in the movie trailer. I guess they want to keep Conservatives in the dark until they pay to watch it in a theater.
Because he enjoys it.
Nick is showing that he is actually a very intelligent guy by taking this stance. The Israel killed Kirk stuff is a bunch of schizo bullshit. So isn’t all these people trying to come up with new theories of how he wasn’t actually shot in the neck by a sniper on the adjacent roof. It’s sad to see the right being so retarded.
They are closing off investigations after just one week, claiming that it was 100% lone crazed gunman operation.
Not sure if Jews are responsible but the way the aftermath is being managed is jewish in character. I think there has been a break between staunch leftists and the jews, due to palestine and perhaps their waning utility. The classist leftists have pivoted somewhat to maintain standing, this being most pronounced in Europe. The problem they face is managing the liberal fallout caused by this pivot. The pink haired leftists on the street are left holding the bag. The jews don't actually care about their BS causes. I think a lot of them are feeling exactly that and it's a major contributing factor to such assassinations and displays of hate, due to feelings of abandonment, waning control of the narrative and urgency.
Doesn't seem smart to think guys like Kimmel are getting fired because the execs are scared of Trump. I don't think the jews send out memos, but there's definitely nudges happening and a lot of these nudges have favorable optics for the normie conservative. The Jews don't seem to have desire to transfer the reins to nationalists so we continue to have this slow roll back on some of the more extreme leftism because the same people continue to be in charge. They continue to bundle up these "conservative reforms" with globohomo causes; one step forward, two step back. Perhaps, abandoning leftism fully once they cleanse the idea of sovereignty from the general pop.
Doesn't seem smart to think guys like Kimmel are getting fired because the execs are scared of Trump. I don't think the jews send out memos, but there's definitely nudges happening and a lot of these nudges have favorable optics for the normie conservative. The Jews don't seem to have desire to transfer the reins to nationalists so we continue to have this slow roll back on some of the more extreme leftism because the same people continue to be in charge. They continue to bundle up these "conservative reforms" with globohomo causes; one step forward, two step back. Perhaps, abandoning leftism fully once they cleanse the idea of sovereignty from the general pop.
JR5
Other Christian
The Charlie Kirk Prevent Online Radicalization, Hate Speech and Anti-Semitism Act
This essay argues that MAGA’s hunger for revenge is being staged and weaponized within the controlled dialectic. What looks like cancel-culture payback against liberals risks becoming the very pretext for new censorship measures - a trap that will ultimately boomerang back on its instigators. If you only see surface politics - MAGA vs. libs, tit-for-tat cancellations - you’ll miss how the same machinery exploits both sides. What follows is a rant in service of symbolic literacy.
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-charlie-kirk-prevent-online-radicalization
This essay argues that MAGA’s hunger for revenge is being staged and weaponized within the controlled dialectic. What looks like cancel-culture payback against liberals risks becoming the very pretext for new censorship measures - a trap that will ultimately boomerang back on its instigators. If you only see surface politics - MAGA vs. libs, tit-for-tat cancellations - you’ll miss how the same machinery exploits both sides. What follows is a rant in service of symbolic literacy.
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-charlie-kirk-prevent-online-radicalization
Fuentes isn't wrong here. People need to have the self awareness to see that they knee jerk Israel blame 10 seconds after anything bad happens.
Instead of following facts to a conclusion, they quickly formulate a desired conclusion and from there they inversely connect the dots Back to the event. It's retarded.
Iakobos
Orthodox
Fuentes is 100% wrong here and is equivocating. The most charitable read is that he is scared for his skin.
When there's sufficient circumstantial evidence to support a hypothesis, then you accept that hypothesis as a working model until more evidence comes to light. There is almost never a 100% proof smoking gun evidence in these matters and it's unlikely there will be in this case.
Fuentes is being dishonest by suddenly changing his standard of proof to make claims. He was 100% that guy who never shuts up about Jews and Israel and he was never worried about being labeled and discredited as such. In fact him and his supporters criticized anyone who DIDN'T talk Jews and Israel all the time.
Now he's worried about that type of smear all of a sudden. It is totally possible to position yourself that there was most probably Israeli involvement without doing so in a manner that will discredit you if more evidence comes to light. Plus Fuentes is a clever weasel and I have complete faith that he could weasel himself out of contradictory evidence should that come to light. This is a key moment to strike against the enemies of America in the public narrative battle and Fuentes is dropping the ball hard.
He's like a captain of an army that stirs and rouses the troops to battle against the enemy. Then when everything is coming to a head, you have the enemy off balance and it's time to strike, he goes to sit on the sideline and says "Weeeell guys I don't know if this is really the best time to do battle. We might lose everything here. Let's wait and see, we don't want to be too hasty."
When there's sufficient circumstantial evidence to support a hypothesis, then you accept that hypothesis as a working model until more evidence comes to light. There is almost never a 100% proof smoking gun evidence in these matters and it's unlikely there will be in this case.
Fuentes is being dishonest by suddenly changing his standard of proof to make claims. He was 100% that guy who never shuts up about Jews and Israel and he was never worried about being labeled and discredited as such. In fact him and his supporters criticized anyone who DIDN'T talk Jews and Israel all the time.
Now he's worried about that type of smear all of a sudden. It is totally possible to position yourself that there was most probably Israeli involvement without doing so in a manner that will discredit you if more evidence comes to light. Plus Fuentes is a clever weasel and I have complete faith that he could weasel himself out of contradictory evidence should that come to light. This is a key moment to strike against the enemies of America in the public narrative battle and Fuentes is dropping the ball hard.
He's like a captain of an army that stirs and rouses the troops to battle against the enemy. Then when everything is coming to a head, you have the enemy off balance and it's time to strike, he goes to sit on the sideline and says "Weeeell guys I don't know if this is really the best time to do battle. We might lose everything here. Let's wait and see, we don't want to be too hasty."
Now i want to admit that i was wrong for judging charlie kirk before, its become clear that we have no idea what kind of struggle or pressure these public figures are dealing with on the back end. Maybe nick fuentes got a visit or call which is why he is laying low on this topic at the moment.
Several people who where close to charlie kirk like his friends and colleaugues comming forward with information that points to israel is not schizo.
The 10 second knee jerk reaction is blaming the left and lgbt.
Last edited:
I don’t know how you come to that conclusion after watching the reaction from the left, seeing them stoke violence since Obama, and seeing that the shooter was a leftist faggot.
How do you ignore that and go “it’s da joos”.
I’ve seen no credible evidence that Kirk was a threat to Israel, he was an ally to them. A massive one. They were offering him money to shill for Israel and maybe he was distancing himself a little bit, but it in no way points towards them deciding to assassinate him. I don’t see how any of that makes sense.
Iakobos
Orthodox
You are asserting that because the person who is captured and accused is a leftist, that therefore there is no Israeli/Mossad involvement. That does not follow logically and even if this patsy did it, that doesn't rule out the Israel angle. If it was Israel, they absolutely want to steer the ensuing narrative into the left vs right paradigm to take the heat off of themselves. It's their classic playbook.
Kirk being a massive historical ally to Israel, is the exact reason why he was such a threat. Israeli interests funded and propped him up as he was the key figure to the only American demographic that provides hope for future political support in the USA: youthful moderate Republican Zionists. If he started to shift his views (such a thing is, in fact, possible), then he would be far more dangerous to Israel than any other influencer because he would undermine their most important audience.
Compilation of ways Kirk was pissing off Zionist backers:
He questioned October 7th as a potentially 'allowed' incident by Israel to incite war.
He platformed anti-Zionists at his events.
He lobbied against war with Iran to Trump.
He called out Epstein for being Mossad.
He said that powerful people behind the scenes were pressuring him strongly to stop these incipient anti-Israel sentiments. And he was pissed off that he was being told he was not 'allowed' to tell the truth as he saw it.
He told multiple people behind the scenes that he was worried Israel would try to kill him, which was reported and made public weeks in advance of his assassination.
He turned down an injection of Zionist funding and a trip to Israel (you know, the trip they have people take when they're getting out of line).
You have to understand that Israel saw him and bought and paid for. When your bought and paid for asset is going off the reservation and potentially taking millions of American youth with him, there is a clear incentive to take action. Not only to shut him down but to send a message to others. And it does seem like some others received the message.