Charlie Kirk Thread



Summarised using https://gist.ly/youtube-summarizer

## Reflections from the Battlefield: The Moral High Ground in War

In the heart of Iraq, 2006, the city of Ramadi was a crucible of violence and chaos. American forces, including a SEAL task unit known as Task Unit Bruiser, were engaged in a relentless struggle to secure and stabilize the city from insurgents who terrorized the local population. The mission was clear but perilous: support coalition forces, conduct reconnaissance, execute raids, and provide sniper overwatch as the Army and Marine Corps fought street by street, house by house.

The brutality of the conflict was ever-present. Soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines displayed extraordinary courage, many paying the ultimate price. Civilians suffered unspeakable atrocities at the hands of insurgents. Amidst this turmoil, the SEALs received intelligence about a high-value al-Qaeda leader—an individual notorious for his cruelty and violence. The opportunity to eliminate such a figure was rare and fraught with risk, but it presented a chance to strike a blow against the forces of chaos.

### The Dilemma of Rules of Engagement

The American military operated under strict rules of engagement (ROE). These rules required that before any engagement, a potential enemy must display a hostile act or clear hostile intent. This policy was designed to protect civilians and minimize collateral damage, even in the most dangerous environments.

In the case of the al-Qaeda leader, intelligence indicated he would be passing through a specific location, but he was unlikely to display overt hostility. The SEAL commander made an uncommon request: to have this individual declared "hostile" by higher command, a legal designation that would allow engagement on sight. This decision was not taken lightly; it required senior officers to weigh intelligence, legal obligations, political considerations, and the broader consequences for U.S. interests.

Despite the compelling case, the request was denied. The operation was canceled, and the opportunity slipped away. The frustration was palpable—seeing comrades wounded and killed, knowing a chance to disrupt enemy leadership had been lost. Yet, this moment reinforced a deeper truth about American values.

### Upholding American Ideals in the Face of Evil

Even in the most desperate circumstances, the United States strives to uphold the rule of law and the sanctity of human life. The refusal to declare the enemy leader hostile, despite his monstrous actions, was a testament to the nation's commitment to its ideals. The moral high ground is not always the easiest path, especially when it comes at great personal risk. But it is a path that defines the character of a nation.

This adherence to principle is not just a matter of policy; it is a reflection of who Americans aspire to be. The willingness to maintain standards, even when facing a remorseless enemy, is what sets a society apart. It is a commitment to justice, not vengeance; to humanity, not savagery.

## The Erosion of Values at Home

Fast forward to the present, and the speaker observes a troubling shift within the United States itself. The standards that once guided the nation in war zones seem to be eroding at home. Violence, murder, and even assassination have become disturbingly commonplace. The recent execution of a man, Charlie Kirk, for his beliefs and words, and the subsequent celebration by some, is a stark indicator of this decline.

### The Question of Depravity

How does a society reach a point where such acts are not only committed but celebrated? The answer lies in the malleability of the human mind and the power of influence. People are shaped by what they see and hear, by the trends they follow, and by the groups they seek to belong to. In times of isolation, fear, and confusion, individuals become especially vulnerable to manipulation.

Brainwashing, once a process that required physical control and isolation, has become far more insidious in the digital age. Today, the primary conduit for manipulation is the smartphone—a device that most people carry with them constantly.

### The Digital Age: A New Frontier for Manipulation

With just a few minutes on a phone, anyone can be exposed to a torrent of divisive, manipulative, and emotionally charged content. Algorithms are designed to keep users engaged, feeding them a steady diet of outrage, frustration, and hate. For those who are insecure, isolated, or young, the effects are profound and predictable: isolation, polarization, dehumanization, and ultimately, radicalization.

#### The Mechanics of Digital Brainwashing

- **Exposure and Repetition:** Constant exposure to extreme content, repeated over time, shapes beliefs and attitudes.
- **Group Pressure and Social Influence:** Online communities reinforce divisive ideas, creating echo chambers that amplify extremism.
- **Emotional Manipulation:** Short, emotionally charged clips are engineered to provoke strong reactions, bypassing reason and critical thinking.

The result is a society where reason is abandoned, norms are rejected, and the most extreme views take hold. In this environment, it becomes all too easy for a disturbed individual to justify violence against those they perceive as "hostile."

## The Consequences: Tribalism and Decline

This process represents a devolution—a regression from a society built on shared values and mutual respect to one fractured by tribalism and hatred. The willingness to declare fellow citizens as enemies, to justify violence against them, is a sign of cultural decline.

### The Need for Self-Imposed Rules

The solution is not more government regulation or technocratic control. Instead, it requires a recommitment to personal responsibility and community values. Individuals, families, and communities must set their own standards and refuse to be manipulated by digital forces.

#### Practical Steps to Resist Digital Manipulation

- **Limit Exposure:** Be mindful of the time spent on devices and the nature of the content consumed.
- **Seek Real Connections:** Prioritize face-to-face interactions with friends and family over digital engagement.
- **Question Emotional Reactions:** Recognize when content is designed to provoke and resist the urge to react impulsively.
- **Cultivate Critical Thinking:** Encourage open dialogue and diverse perspectives, rather than retreating into echo chambers.

## The Call to Action: Reclaiming American Values

There is darkness in the world, and it has never been easier for that darkness to infiltrate our minds and hearts. The challenge is to resist—to cast out the digital demons and refuse to be possessed by electronic emotions.

### Reconnecting with What Matters

- **Listen to Friends, Not Feeds:** Value the opinions and support of those you know and trust.
- **Talk to People, Not Pixels:** Engage in meaningful conversations, not just online exchanges.
- **Connect with Family, Not Firmware:** Strengthen the bonds that matter most, away from screens and devices.

### Walking in the Light

The principles that founded the United States—liberty, justice, and unity—are not just historical artifacts. They are living ideals that require constant vigilance and effort. The nation is defined not by its laws or its leaders, but by the actions and choices of its people.

#### The Role of the Individual

Every American has a role to play in upholding these values. It is not the responsibility of the political class or the elite, but of each citizen. The freedoms that have been fought for and defended over generations are a sacred trust, one that must be protected and cherished.

## Building Bridges, Not Walls

The blood that has been shed in defense of freedom is a reminder of the cost of division and hatred. The path forward is not through hostility or enmity, but through understanding and connection. Americans must strive to build bridges, to find common ground, and to act with compassion and respect.

### The Imperative of Unity

Too much has been lost already. The nation cannot afford to be torn apart by internal strife. The call is clear: to act like Americans, to embody the ideals of bravery, strength, and freedom, and to reject the forces that seek to divide.

## Conclusion: One Nation, Under God

The story of Task Unit Bruiser in Ramadi is more than a tale of war; it is a lesson in the enduring power of values. Even in the face of unimaginable evil, the commitment to the rule of law and the sanctity of life prevailed. That same commitment is needed now, perhaps more than ever.

The challenges of the digital age are real, and the threats to unity and freedom are profound. But the solution lies within each individual, in the choices made every day. By refusing to be manipulated, by seeking connection over division, and by upholding the principles that define the nation, Americans can ensure that the light of liberty continues to shine.

Let us remember who we are. Let us act with courage, integrity, and compassion. Let us be, in every sense, Americans—brave, strong, and free. The future of the nation depends on it.
 
I'm on board with 90% of what he said. But when multi-millionaires tell you that you need to work 16 hours a day just to support your family, it feels a bit tone deaf, ya know?
I understand the feeling for sure. The nice thing about Charlie is that he seemed to adjust his viewpoints as he became aware of the issues. Much as how he was changing on Israel.

He covers some of the wealth struggles facing young Americans in an interview with Tucker that was released a month ago:



This episode is what made me really appreciate him, despite differences I had with him on other viewpoints.
 
Does anyone else think the hole in Charlie's neck looks like an exit wound from a smaller round than a 30-06?
Was the dude on the roof a distraction?
Thoughts?
I think the official story is full of holes. As a first general assumption, it's always safe to assume the government is lying a lot about the details of the case. There is hidden dirt in this case
 
Does anyone else think the hole in Charlie's neck looks like an exit wound from a smaller round than a 30-06?
Was the dude on the roof a distraction?
Thoughts?
Well, I've seen a 30-06 pass through a moose ribcage, entry wound and exit wound; I believe (I have no professional forensic background) that a moose ribcage is more substantial than a human neck. Just saying.
 
This is the prime opportunity for the government to crack down on trans/lgbt+ and radical leftist ideology as well as interracial violence. It is also a prime opportunity for them to push Christian theocracy ("we tried secularism and it didn't work") and, at the very least, Christian morality.

This is the last opportunity to crack down on the left. Kirk's assassination was a public declaration of war against Christian Americans. There are no excuses left.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone else think the hole in Charlie's neck looks like an exit wound from a smaller round than a 30-06?
With all the footage available we would have seen a second wound on his opposite side, if that was true.

Was the dude on the roof a distraction?
I think the weird behavior from guys on the ground was the distraction.
 
But this recent shooting has not made me more cozy with getting people fired for what they post on Twitter, either.
I’ve actually reached out to leftist friends and said can we just have a handshake and be like “this sucks” “yeah man this sucks” and agree nobody’s getting fired for posts anymore?

Rather than going “agreed, truce. No more taking peoples livelihoods” they just screamed “BUT THAT WAS DIFFERENT” It’s always different.
 
With all the footage available we would have seen a second wound on his opposite side, if that was true.


I think the weird behavior from guys on the ground was the distraction.
How to explain the hole in his neck?
I've shot moose with a 30-06 also, and deer as well. I don't recall an entrance wound that large. It almost looks like the exit wound of a smaller cal. If that was the case, and he was struck on the right side or the base of his skull, you wouldn't even see the entry hole from any of the camera angles. It would be small. I might add, I am no expert when it comes to ballistics. 🙂
 
How to explain the hole in his neck?
I've shot moose with a 30-06 also, and deer as well. I don't recall an entrance wound that large. It almost looks like the exit wound of a smaller cal. If that was the case, and he was struck on the right side or the base of his skull, you wouldn't even see the entry hole from any of the camera angles. It would be small. I might add, I am no expert when it comes to ballistics. 🙂

Definitely wasn't shot from the back on the base of the skull, as he was covered by a banner from behind. Shot from the right side? A bullet entering his neck would have hit his carotid/jugular and caused visible bleeding.
 
How to explain the hole in his neck?
I've shot moose with a 30-06 also, and deer as well. I don't recall an entrance wound that large. It almost looks like the exit wound of a smaller cal. If that was the case, and he was struck on the right side or the base of his skull, you wouldn't even see the entry hole from any of the camera angles. It would be small. I might add, I am no expert when it comes to ballistics. 🙂
IMG_2107.jpeg
 
Definitely wasn't shot from the back on the base of the skull, as he was covered by a banner from behind. Shot from the right side? A bullet entering his neck would have hit his carotid/jugular and caused visible bleeding.
I looked up exit wounds for 30-06 bullets and found a bunch of pictures. They generally showed about a 2" wide exit hole. The pictures were all close up, so it wasn't even clear where the hole was on the body in most cases, but the size was pretty consistent.

If Kirk had a 2" exit wound on the back of his neck, that seems consistent with the spray of blood that was produced, and also explains why he was all but dead within seconds. They somehow managed to keep him on life support and I assume they infused him with blood, but with a wound like that there was never really a chance.

All this being said, I think there is a pretty good chance that the rifle they supposedly found in the woods was not the murder weapon. There are too many problems with that, such as pictures of Robinson without a rifle, and the failure to recover the bullet after the shooting.

It seems almost impossible that they wouldn't have found the bullet after the shooting. They dismantled the booth area he was in, and actually redid the landscaping already within days after the shooting. I bet they do have the bullet and know of another weapon, and are lying to the public.
 
Looks like our (((diversion)) guy was also a pedo.

Man claimed to shoot Charlie Kirk to 'draw attention from the real shooter,' police say​


  • George Hodgson Zinn, 71, was arrested for investigation of obstruction of justice in the Charlie Kirk murder investigation.
  • Police say Zinn claimed to shoot Kirk to divert attention from the actual shooter.
  • Zinn was also arrested for investigation of sexual exploitation of a minor in a separate investigation.
 
Looking at the obscene level of hate Charlie Kirk has gotten online. More leftists are celebrating than after the Trump assassination, and when I confront them about their shameless hatred, they claim all of the celebrations are coming from bots. Demonic behaviour.

It makes me really think. Just who was Charlie Kirk? I hardly knew him...


View attachment Snaptik.app_7246826672488533275.mov
 
Don´t know how accurate these reports are:

A Trump insider and longtime friend of Charlie Kirk tells The Grayzone how the assassinated conservative leader’s turning point on Israeli influence provoked a private backlash from Netanyahu’s allies that left him angry and afraid.

The source said anxiety spread within the Trump administration after an apparent Israeli spying operation was uncovered.


Charlie Kirk rejected an offer earlier this year from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to arrange a massive new infusion of Zionist money into his Turning Point USA (TPUSA) organization, America’s largest conservative youth association, according to a longtime friend of the slain commentator speaking on the condition of anonymity. The source told The Grayzone that the late pro-Trump influencer believed Netanyahu was trying to cow him into silence as he began to publicly question Israel’s overwhelming influence in Washington and demanded more space to criticize it.

In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions, and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb.

According to Kirk’s friend, who also enjoyed access to President Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel’s behalf. “Charlie was the only person who did that,” they said, recalling how Trump “barked at him” in response and angrily shut down the conversation. The source believes the incident confirmed in Kirk’s mind that the president of the United States had fallen under the control of a malign foreign power, and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts.

By the following month, Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu – figures he described in an interview as Jewish “leaders” and “stakeholders.”

“He was afraid of them,” the source emphasized.

(...)

According to Kirk’s longtime friend, Kirk’s resentment of Netanyahu and the Israel lobby was spreading within Trump’s inner circle. In fact, they said, the president himself was terrified of Netanyahu’s wrath, and feared the consequences of defying him.

During the past year, the Trump insider was told by contacts in the White House that the Secret Service had caught Israeli government personnel placing electronic devices on its emergency response vehicles on two separate occasions.

While The Grayzone was unable to confirm the story with the Secret Service or White House, such an incident would not have been unprecedented. Indeed, according to a report in Politico citing three former senior US officials, a cellphone spying device was placed by Israeli agents “near the White House and other sensitive locations around Washington” toward the end of Trump’s first term in 2019.





Billionaire Bill Ackman convened stormy Israel ‘intervention’ with Charlie Kirk, sources say


 
Back
Top