Charlie Kirk Thread
- Thread starter Cooper
- Start date
There’s a lot of videos of Charlie’s trending. This is not bad, it could be me or anyone of us discussing the Jewish question,
I can't believe this ever aired on 60 minutes. Why would they go publicly announce something like this to the world when Israel is trying to gain favor with the US and the rest of the world for political support?
My best guess, is that they thought they were untouchable. Maybe you wanna call it extreme arrogance, extremely full of themselves, they figure they already hold all the cards and there’s nothing anyone else can do to stop them.
This is why I am saying to keep yourself anonymous on the Internet
Thoughts?
1. Is there a specific term for a jewish dwarf?
2. He'd have to start the list with the medical examiner.
That fella sounds like a friend of mine; has heard all these things online, these things jive with what he sees, they "feel" right, but is easily shut down by someone who sounds like they are much better-read on the matter. In desperation, they branch out onto side debates and keep getting frustrated.
I've yet to watch the Sam Hyde video, I'm guessing it's going to make the same point, but I believe Charlie Kirk was killed for being a white, unapologetic Christian. The whole tranny thing is a distraction, cope and perhaps damage control being done by normiecon to turn down the temperature. Damage control as in this insistence that the enemy is a tiny minority, the enemy is weak, and the enemy is silly.
Not sure if it was mentioned but the apologetics community has a thing for Sneako and it was stated the muslims too are glad Charlie is dead. I think there's an important contrarian angle here that is not adequately being addressed. That angle is about the "innocence" of Charlie.
What the muslims proclaim is that Charlie was an enemy of islam. I think this is important to ponder on. The first thing to realize is that as Christian we don't believe that all religions are equal, which is a heretical subversion to begin with. The second thing to realize is that if islam is false then by extension muslims as in the people are not our human equals. I'm not going go as far to say that muslims are the enemy of Christians, that's the job of priests to make such rulings, but due to the general apathy of Christians there appears to be an unaddressed rising dynamic. In condemning other religions, you are essentially declaring war on them. It is bizarre when Christians get confused by their civic concept of freedom of speech, seemingly assuming that they can preach against Islam, and vice versa, but remain on civil terms. This idea that civility is the default. They don't see it that way. Until we acknowledge that this goes beyond a war of ideas, nothing can change. This is a physical war just as much. This applies to all groups who oppose European civilization and the western world, not just muslims. Either shut up like the government wants you to, for the sake of civility, or fight to bring your enemies to heel.
Not sure if it was mentioned but the apologetics community has a thing for Sneako and it was stated the muslims too are glad Charlie is dead. I think there's an important contrarian angle here that is not adequately being addressed. That angle is about the "innocence" of Charlie.
What the muslims proclaim is that Charlie was an enemy of islam. I think this is important to ponder on. The first thing to realize is that as Christian we don't believe that all religions are equal, which is a heretical subversion to begin with. The second thing to realize is that if islam is false then by extension muslims as in the people are not our human equals. I'm not going go as far to say that muslims are the enemy of Christians, that's the job of priests to make such rulings, but due to the general apathy of Christians there appears to be an unaddressed rising dynamic. In condemning other religions, you are essentially declaring war on them. It is bizarre when Christians get confused by their civic concept of freedom of speech, seemingly assuming that they can preach against Islam, and vice versa, but remain on civil terms. This idea that civility is the default. They don't see it that way. Until we acknowledge that this goes beyond a war of ideas, nothing can change. This is a physical war just as much. This applies to all groups who oppose European civilization and the western world, not just muslims. Either shut up like the government wants you to, for the sake of civility, or fight to bring your enemies to heel.
Normies will still not get that message, but insiders will, so it is a bit of a way to demoralize the latter without really moving the needle for the general public.
Normies will believe anything about Russia, China, muzzies pulling nefarious crap but don't really grasp the extent of the Israeli control grid.
Vice President JD Vance hosting Charlie's podcast. He lays it out and swings hard at the left. I'll be curious to see where this really goes.
It's to Vance's credit that he has the chops to be able to do this. To sit down in Charlie Kirk's seat after he was shot, and be able to carry it off well takes some real brains and communications skills.
I haven't had time to watch it. Can anyone comment how much time Vance spent talking about Christ, the Bible, and Christian beliefs and values? I will concede that he probably pushed some zionist viewpoints as Kirk also was known for doing.
Edit: I see this video is only the final 13 minutes of the show. Did anyone watch the whole thing?
I didn't watch the entire podcast, but in the final 13 minutes JD quotes the Creed (Apostle's Creed, I believe), the Our Father, and Ephesians.
Neither had adequate preparation for the topic.
There’s a number of videos of Charlie going to Cambridge and debating the students there. The students in Cambridge were super prepared.. They are cleaning victory, etc…. Charlie’s purpose was never to mop the floor in a debate, just explore ideas with someone with a vastly different viewpoint.
Can't get fired when your boss and all your co-workers agree with you!
Also, full Podcast
At around the 5:15 mark he cites the Creed and essentially says Jesus is the Truth. There still is some tentativeness there but I'd be curious if there has been a time in history when a VP has spoken like this. This was more than the usual free masonic type nod and wink to some higher power "god" for unity.
That would be, "Jew."
Agreed about the Vice President. On the one hand, the VP has always been a far lesser role than the president. On the other hand, for the VP of the United States to fill the seat of a Christian Political Activist/Media Influencer after they were shot is unique. He is representing Kirk's legacy, but he's also representing Trump's administration. It's great that he came out and strongly affirmed Christianity.