Pearl Davis: "Just Pearly Things"
- Thread starter starlight
- Start date
She is dodging the fact that women are the main ones who push for left wing policies.
She didn't dodge, she only added to Pearl's point, talking about Alfred Kinsey, Hugh Hefner etc. These people were highly influential on the current behavior of women and society in general, that is a fact. I don't think Pearl even knows who Kinsey is, do you? Pearl is mostly right, but lacks intellectual depth here, if she was better educated on the subject she would have accepted Rose's answer as a deeper reason for the behavior of women today.
This being said, Rose is not giving the full answer here either on the root causes of feminism and the attacks on western Christian society. Pearl is either too dumb or too scared to go there as well.
Kinsey was a gay pedophile who did weird experiments on babies to test their orgasms as well as played a role in normalizing homosexuality in the modern world.
I know what you mean, and I suspect you know this, but here's the nuance: Lila knows that if she admits that women are just consensus thinkers and that 99% are going to be a reflection of the society they live in, they can't be anywhere near the egalitarian claims and idol modernity sets up as a lie. That's particularly hard for a woman who has a media presence to admit, since it basically shows that things other than reason and logic drive women's actions, and even intent.
That is correct.
There a lot of inputs into the chaotic culture, but it is pretty hard for women to admit the basic fact (if I do it I bring up Ann Coulter to stifle their attacks) that if women didn't vote, as Pearl says, the liberal society and family/husband problems would be monumentally more hard to accomplish, if not impossible.
I was going to make a thread on the M:F ratio thing, which is part of the population boom problem. It's not a coincidence that societies with high number of males have more chaotic women and gynocentrism. I've written about this extensively on the forum. Everything ultimately comes down to selection pressure on women, since by definition they are what they are, and they will default to that (laziness, do nothing) especially since they mature earlier and are what they are earlier, which generally will hurt their maturation into later adulthood.
In this clip Pearl reads some of her recent writings on women getting a lot out of life in 2025 without having to put in much work (yet they are still unhappy)...
TL;DR Rape = forced sex
Mere lack of consent isn’t rape that’s manipulative language and feminist rhetoric.
I love that one point she makes about women being some of the only people who can afford to dine out regularly. I see this all the time when I walk by restaurants in my town and every table is either a couple or just women.
Whether this is because they have their dates paying for the rest of their meals that week or they are Only Fans whores, I don't know. But it sure seems like a huge disparity between male and female diners when you look at who is eating at these places.
No children. No way you can eat out anymore when you have multiple.
This deals with the dissonance that exists in human logic.
First things first; they hate you, they want you dead and they think it's funny. That's true always. At its core this about male disempowerment. Like everything human beings have to drape themselves in virtue, here acting like an arbiter in the inequality of the power dynamic. This inequality is women not fit to impose their will onto a man. Therefore, in their mind, a woman can either be a willing or an unwilling participant in all interactions. Maybe women even perceive reality that way. Taking it a step further she can also be manipulated. They're unable to legislate "manipulation" so they're trying to expand the "consent" framework. This is the result; retardation.
Of course, how is this different from the male experience? I am not actually a supreme master of my environment either. All human interaction boils down to intent.
Regardless, what the legal system is doing here is simping for women and oppressing men. It's not very different from regular simping that runs in our veins. That anger you feel anytime a woman tells you some sob story about Billy Bad Ass harassing her and touching the goods. In our particular situation the simp train has went way off the rails HARD.
Essentially, in a proper society simps would make sure that women are not mistreated because simps would be in control. With the power to get women, comes the power to protect women. Power is a virtue in the hands of a righteous man. In a satanic inversion of common sense, they are removing the authority of men to get women, only to make women completely unsafe. White men are unable to protect white women from the migrants because they're no longer have any authority for example. So the system has to double down even harder in oppressing men.
Eventually it will all collapse under its own weight and men who seek and appreciate power will create a community of trusted kin where women can feel safe without the involvement of daddy government.
Last edited:
A lot of the new places cater to women now, they have smallish portions, trendy and expensive dishes, with emphasis on the decor.