Volodymyr Zelensky Thread

Does anybody else think that although Zelensky is a clown, we can still learn many positive things from him?
  • Zelensky is often called a chewish midget emperor. But despite his height he is able to hold frame when meeting with world leaders taller than him. Not only that he managed to get elected in a situation where image and charisma matters. I heard in the US the president that get elected is the taller one (usually more than 185 cm).
  • Zelensky managed to hold power for longer than allowed for him. A US president no matter how strong or popular they are not able to do this (only Franklin D Roosevelt was able to perform this feat).
  • Zelensky managed to build his own career from scratch and build his own production company (Kvartal 95), and from there he managed to live a comfortable live.
  • Zelensky succeeded in finding a beautiful Eastern European wife despite his height.
  • As an Emperor, Zelensky could build his own harem and choose to remarry to a younger wife, but he chose to stay loyal.
  • Zelensky is often called a beggar, but a beggar usually only manage to earn just enough to survive. Zelensky managed to earn billions of dollars. He should teach others about deal making and negotiation skill.
  • Zelensky has excellent stress management skills. Almost all people when put in his positions would crack under pressure.
I think that these are some of his positive qualities that often get overlooked.


I take it you're also short so you find inspiration in him for that reason? Find yourself better role models brother.....the guy is a garbage human being getting his countrymen slaughtered for a nefarious agenda and begging to pull the rest of us in the meat grinder with them. If he were 7ft tall it wouldn't change who he is as a man, just like you.
 
Last edited:
I take it you're also short so you find inspiration in him for that reason? Find yourself better role models brother.....the guy is a garbage human being getting his countrymen slaughtered for a nefarious agenda and begging to pull the rest of us in the meat grinder with them. If he were 7ft tall it wouldn't change who he is as a man, just like you.
Yes, that’s right—I’m about the same height as Zelensky, just under 170 cm tall. That’s why, when forum members referred to him as a chewish midget emperor, I couldn’t help but admire his determination and work ethic.

I think Zelensky carries himself with confidence, even when meeting people who tower over him. He shows that it ultimately doesn’t matter—as long as he doesn’t let it affect him. And despite being mocked by people around the world, he doesn’t seem to let it get under his skin.

For the record, height has never been an issue for me, since being under 170 cm is considered average where I live (unlike in the West, where it’s often seen as short—and supposedly a death sentence in the dating world). Women here are, on average, around 155 cm tall.​
 
Yes, that’s right—I’m about the same height as Zelensky, just under 170 cm tall. That’s why, when forum members referred to him as a chewish midget emperor, I couldn’t help but admire his determination and work ethic.

I think Zelensky carries himself with confidence, even when meeting people who tower over him. He shows that it ultimately doesn’t matter—as long as he doesn’t let it affect him. And despite being mocked by people around the world, he doesn’t seem to let it get under his skin.

For the record, height has never been an issue for me, since being under 170 cm is considered average where I live (unlike in the West, where it’s often seen as short—and supposedly a death sentence in the dating world). Women here are, on average, around 155 cm tall.​

What do any of those things matter if he's a disgusting human being, what does your image matter if you're doing evil things to your fellow man?
 
Yes, that’s right—I’m about the same height as Zelensky, just under 170 cm tall. That’s why, when forum members referred to him as a chewish midget emperor, I couldn’t help but admire his determination and work ethic.

I think Zelensky carries himself with confidence, even when meeting people who tower over him. He shows that it ultimately doesn’t matter—as long as he doesn’t let it affect him. And despite being mocked by people around the world, he doesn’t seem to let it get under his skin.

For the record, height has never been an issue for me, since being under 170 cm is considered average where I live (unlike in the West, where it’s often seen as short—and supposedly a death sentence in the dating world). Women here are, on average, around 155 cm tall.​
Napoleon was 169cms. Whats your point?

Zelensky is a corrupt imbecile. Dictator. Jew. Who is forcing his people into a war. When was the last time Ukraine held elections? How do we know ukrainians want this?

MSM doesnt show neither the forced drafts neither the war images. I will start posting them. Guys getting blast by drones. Yesterday soldiers getting burned alive inside a vehicle. And for what? Russia is nuclear.
 
Learn? I'm 6'2", I don't need to learn anything. It is you who has much to learn. Do not marvel at these sand midgets and their magic tricks, seek knowledge within halls of the white man, for we are titans. Just like a bird soaring across the sky, my eyes are privy to things not afforded to your kind, for they see wide and far.

tv land lol GIF by nobodies.
 
Ukrainian parliament passed, and Zelensky already signed, a law that de facto dismantles the anti-corruption institutions: NABU (National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine) and SAP (Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office), by bringing them under the office of the prosecutor general, who is appointed by the president. This comes just a day after SBU raided NABU offices and detained its officers for alleged cooperation with Russia, while NABU opened a corruption case against SBU officers.
People slowly gather on the streets.



 
Last edited:



Today, the President’s party—teamed up with "pro-Russian" OPZZh, Yulia Tymoshenko’s bloc, and a bunch of other political opportunists—basically liquidated NABU and SAPO.

From now on, these anti-corruption bodies will report directly to the Prosecutor General.
And guess who appoints the Prosecutor General? That’s right—Zelensky himself.

So… who was it again saying Zelensky isn’t a dictator?
Your turn, folks. Step into the spotlight.




Edit.


“What if I told you that NABU is being dismantled because its detectives started investigating drone production? And that tens of billions of hryvnias under classified contracts were handed over to companies linked to Zelensky’s own partners—as well as to those of Yermak and Arakhamia,” writes investigative journalist Yurii Nikolov.

So, Zelensky’s clique reportedly is looting money from Western and Ukrainian taxpayers in the defense sector—right in the middle of an 'existential war'.

And at the same time, they’re sending thousands of men to die in the frontline.

So, when’s the next batch of Western “aid” dropping?
Zelensky and his buddies are already rubbing their hands in excitement.
 



Ukraine - Zelenski Ends Independence Of Anti-Corruption Institutions​

July 22, 2025

Last Friday I reported about a fight between the Zelenski regime on the one side and some oligarchs and U.S. aligned non-government-organizations on the other side.

An intense information operation has been launched to remove Ukraine's (former) President Vladimir Zelenski from office. Behind it are a cabal of Ukrainian opposition figures in coordination which western media and parts of the Trump administration.
The current campaign follows a earlier one which was directed against Zelenski's main advisor and head of the office of the president Andrei Yermak.


Pieces in western media had attacked the Zelenski regime with accusations that it was seeking control over the independent anti-corruption institutions which had been established after the Maidan coup. Anti-corruption investigation had lately been moving in on some persons near to Zelenski himself.

Excursus:

In most countries one will find on vertical judicial construct in the form of the police doing criminal investigations, prosecutors directing the police while building court cases against perpetrators and a hierarchy of courts to judge about those.

After the U.S. directed Maidan coup in 2014 the U.S. government, in form of then Vice-President Joe Biden, set out to gain complete control over Ukraine.

It insisted on creating a second, completely separate legal vertical in Ukraine focused solely corruption.

nabu.jpg


The National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) investigates cases of corruption especially of officials in higher position. The Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor Office (SAPO) assembled cases to go to court. The High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine is judging over them.

The vertical was designed to be independent of the Ukrainian government and state. A special Civil Oversight Council - not the parliament - is nominally in control of it. But the effective control was always with the U.S. embassy in Kiev through the various anti-corruption NGOs and media it was financing in Ukraine.

In 2020 the Constitutional Court of Ukraine judged that much of Ukraine's 2014 anti-corruption reform and the new vertical formed through it were unconstitutional. This led to a constitutional crisis which is still unresolved.

Over time the anti-corruption vertical had turned out to be as corrupt as the politicians and high level officials it was designed to keep under control.

End-excursus


Zelenski's opposition was using the anti-corruption complex, the attached NGOs and media to keep some pressure on the government.

Last week's public-relation attack by the opposition against Zelenski, via the Financial Times and other media, was supposed to gain it support from U.S. and European governments. However throughout the weekend no western support in form of public statements etc was received.

The Zelenski regime interpreted this as a green light to take down the last institution in Ukraine which is not under its direct control.

On Monday it launched its all out assault:

Ukraine's independent anti-corruption institutions have had a rough Monday.
The Prosecutor General's Office, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), and the State Investigation Bureau conducted at least 70 searches in premises connected to the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU), which investigates top-level corruption.

The opened probes target at least 15 NABU employees. Most of the cases involve traffic accidents, while some of the NABU employees are also accused of having links to Russia.

The Security Service also searched the Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), which prosecutes corruption.

The sweeping searches, which involve a variety of cases, are seen as an attempt by authorities to bring independent anti-corruption institutions under government control.

"The special operation has all signs of an attempt to dismantle the anti-corruption infrastructure," Daria Kaleniuk, executive director of the Anti-Corruption Action Center, told the Kyiv Independent. "We are witnessing a decade of anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine being dismantled. This is a 180-degree turn away from European integration."

The Anti-Corruption Action Center's head, Vitaliy Shabunin, was himself charged on July 11 with evading military service and fraud.


Today the Ukrainian parliament voted to put the whole 'independent' anti-corruption complex under direct government control:

Ukraine’s parliament has backed a push by Kyiv’s presidential office for greater control over the country’s independent anti-corruption bodies, in a move that critics warn would hand President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s circle more influence over investigations.
Lawmakers voted on Tuesday in favour of legislation that would, in effect, eliminate the independence of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (Nabu) and its partner organisation the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (Sapo), according to four lawmakers and officials familiar who spoke with the Financial Times during the vote.

The parliament also voted in favour of rushing the law to the president for his signature.


The NABU and SAPO are now under the control of the Prosecutor General who is appointed directly by the president.

These powers include authority over Sapo, access to case files and the ability to reassign or redirect Nabu investigations, NABU said on Tuesday.
Several MPs from opposition parties, including the former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, spoke in favour of the legislation, according to lawmakers. Tymoshenko accused Ukraine’s western partners of trying to control Kyiv through Nabu and Sapo.


The blitz against the anti-corruption organizations (accusations and searches on Monday, new law dismantling them on Tuesday) by the Zelenski regime was designed to surprise those who might have an interest in keeping some independent institutions in Ukraine. It is now too late to oppose it.

It also prevents NABU and SAPO from bringing up cases of corruption against Zelenski's operators as well as against the president himself.
 


More Promises Of Western Aid Emboldened Ukraine To Neutralize Anti-Corruption Institutions​

The EU and NATO recently promised more aid for Ukraine. The first did so in late May after the European Council created the “Security Action For Europe” (SAFE) instrument, which will provide up to €150 billion in low-interest loans for defense investments in the bloc’s members and also Ukraine, while the second came in mid-July when Trump announced that NATO members agreed to pay full price for new US arms that they’ll transfer to Ukraine. These promises emboldened Ukraine to raid its anti-corruption bureau.

Bloomberg condemned the move in a sharp opinion piece while The Economist warned that “something sinister is at work” after Zelensky then signed a law that was rushed through the Rada shortly afterwards for subordinating the anti-corruption bureau and its prosecutorial counterpart to presidential control.

Protests have since erupted in several Ukrainian cities over the latter move, which could only be possible with the SBU’s tacit approval, but it’s premature to conclude that a power struggle is underway.

In any case, a security-related pretext was exploited to justify intimidating and then subordinating anti-corruption institutions to the presidency ahead of more promised aid from the West.

Had those promises not been made, then there’d be a lot less money to steal, thus making it less likely that Ukraine would risk negative Western media coverage by doing what it just did. After all, those moves generated more negative attention than any of its anti-corruption institutions’ accusations against state officials.

Nevertheless, precedent suggests that the West won’t curtail its promised aid despite credible concerns that some of it will be stolen, including some of the arms that NATO might soon send. Russia’s First Deputy Representative to the UN Dmitry Polyanskiy claimed last October that “15% to 20% of all military goods received by Kiev end up on the gray and black markets within the next two weeks.”

The Swiss-based Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime also warned about this threat in February.

The reason why Western aid will likely continue flowing into Ukraine in spite of it brazenly neutralizing its anti-corruption institutions is because that bloc has already accepted that some of it will be stolen as the price to pay for continuing their proxy war on Russia.

For as loud as public opinion against this campaign might sometimes become within their society, average folks have practically no influence over the formulation of foreign policy, whose decisionmakers routinely ignore their complaints and concerns.

Many of them pinned their hopes on Trump disengaging from the conflict and thus likely leading to the US’ junior partners following suit since they’d struggle to replace its lost aid, yet he deeply disappointed them with his new three-pronged approach towards this proxy war that can be read about here.

His clumsy attempt to thread the needle between radically escalating American involvement and walking away convinced Zelensky that he was successful in his efforts to manipulate Trump into mission creep.

The end result is that Ukraine’s gravy train will continue chugging along, fueled by Western taxpayers’ funds, though all this promised aid will only perpetuate the proxy war on Russia instead of ending it.

At most, it might decelerate the pace of Russia’s on-the-ground gains, but it’s not expected to reverse them.

The ideal solution is for the West to cut its financial losses by coercing Ukraine into compromising with Russia, but that won’t happen without Trump’s leadership, and he’s now more interested in escalating.
 
Back
Top