The Epstein Docs

[Thomas More]

It's an AI generated image, which is again quite obvious because the picture feels 'off'.

The two boys have circles around their faces because about a year ago there were rumours on the Island Boys being in whatever shape or form related to Epstein Island.

View attachment 22608

Low info distraction take, the Island Boys are simply disturbed and that's it.

Whether or not this image is AI, I generally assume that all pedophiles are equally willing to rape boys as they are to rape girls.. Therefore, I have to assume that this was happening at the Epstein Island in front of many of his powerful and influential guests, the same as it was happen at Diddy parties in front of guests like the Obamas. Justin Bieber was just one of the many passed around as a child at Diddy's place.

 

[Steady Hands]

Real pic or some crappy AI generated one?

The picture in question is surely manipulated. Look at the shadow on the collar -- a clear sign of manipulation.

Edit: @LaAguilaNegra just answered definitively.

Discussion continued here to reduce off-topic posting; this is not about Epstein, and more about AI, image manipulation etc:

Post in thread 'Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Thread'

Yesterday at 5:41 AM

Continued from here to separate the topics: https://christisking.cc/threads/the-epstein-docs.614/post-103300

---

---

Have you, the reader, noticed this as well?

Again,

And again,

And again...

All over the web, people continue to rely on questionable evidence as "proof", including images and videos which turn out to be manipulated. This also goes for countless supposed screenshots, images of Tweets, audio of political interviews, videos of war, etc.

This is counter-productive to the...

• Steady Hands

• 
• 

 

[RedLagoon]

Not just that they use the whole "tropical paradise" schpiel as if that's where they got their white kids

 

[PurpleUrkel]

I told you that they changed the name of the building but you deliberately ignored me and restated your original talking point as if it was reality.

You are the one deliberately ignoring facts. And I told you that they bought the building in 2007 yet waited 15 years to change the number. The building was 666 for 15 years under Kushner ownership and has been 660 for a scant 3 years and yet you keep bloviating with "How could you not know this!?! Do your research! You are deliberately being superstitious and misleading with regards to the number 666!" Well, I am more right than you by a margin of 4 to 1. Why did they wait 15 years to change the number? And if the number means nothing then why did they change it?

And again, you conveniently glossed over every point I made regarding Trump and seized on this 666 thing because you have some bone to pick with people who are "superstitious" about the number because you're somekind of Biblical scholar who enjoys playing "You're wrong," "I'm right" with issues regarding scripture. Stop it.

So would you now like to address the main body of my post(s) or are you going to continue to be fanatical and irrational regarding the mentioning of the number "666"?

Trump never talked to his children about jews? He never said to Ivanka: "Never marry a jew"... "Especially one that owns a building numbered 666"? Why would this be? Why would such a "powerful," "intelligent" man not indocternate his children with counter-semitism?

^ NOTE to all 666 Biblical autistis regarding the above: Ivanka married Kushner in 2009 when the building was still numbered 666.

Trump knows all about this because while being a close associate of Epstein's for 15 years Trump heard this type of JQ-supremacy talk plenty of times. And this is just one reason he encouraged Ivanka to marry the son of a criminal jew who worked for Israeli intelligence and owns a building in Manhattan numbered 666 (you can't make this sh*t up).

Anyone who has followed Trump since the 1980's with even the slightest bit of objectivity can see what is happening here. Trump is one of (((them))). It's a big club and we ain't in it. Trump is not a man of the people, and he is most certainly not a Christian. And there is nothing more disturbing and uncouth than a man who claims to be a Christian while living like a greedy, back stabbing jew

Trump gleefully and "proudly" married his children off to jews thus forever joining his bloodline with Satan's chosen people.

Trump never says the words "Jesus Christ" (in accordance with talmudic doctrine).

Trump is an amoral adulterous womanizer with children from 3 different women who not only knew Epstein but hung out with him... "Birds of a feather flock together." Any denial of Trump's debaucherous, selfish, gaudy life of anti-Christian "values" is a lie.

Some men on this forum refer to Trump as a "Christian man" when he has so obviously lived a life in complete opposition to Christianity. But again, don't believe your "antisemetic," "conspiracy theorist," "blame everything on the jews" lying eyes.

 

[budoslavic]

Real pic or some crappy AI generated one?

For those unaware, there are online AI Image Detector tools to check to see if an image or picture is real or AI generated.

 

[Caduceus]

For those unaware, there are online AI Image Detector tools to check to see if an image or picture is real or AI generated.

Yeah, the Russians used a similar tool on the US moon landing pics from 1969 and they all came up fake.

 

[GodfatherPartTwo]

So would you now like to address the main body of my post(s) or are you going to continue to be fanatical and irrational regarding the mentioning of the number "666"?

I dont have a problem with the main body of your posts other than this one where you've been refuted but you keep digging your heels in.

Since I'm at it, you're wrong about this point too:

Trump never says the words "Jesus Christ" (in accordance with talmudic doctrine).

 

[Ember]

Trump continues to insult much of his base by calling them 'troublemakers', having previously labelled them as 'weaklings'. As someone commented on a Duran video, he is just one step away from using the term 'Basket of Deplorables'.

 

[RedLagoon]

For those unaware, there are online AI Image Detector tools to check to see if an image or picture is real or AI generated.

Give me a hand brother.

 

[The Penitent Man]

It's an AI generated image, which is again quite obvious because the picture feels 'off'.

The two boys have circles around their faces because about a year ago there were rumours on the Island Boys being in whatever shape or form related to Epstein Island.

View attachment 22608

Low info distraction take, the Island Boys are simply disturbed and that's it.

The two boys who were circled actually look like their faces were taken from older (in age) movie actors. I don’t know their names but when I have time I’ll find them and post.

 

[eradicator]

Real pic or some crappy AI generated one?

The photo itself looks rather old, maybe from the 1990s or early 2000s

Artificially generated photos, generally look way different than that

My guess is that the photo was real


Edit but if you know of better ways to detect it such as online tools, please do share

 

[Iakobos]

The photo itself looks rather old, maybe from the 1990s or early 2000s

Artificially generated photos, generally look way different than that

My guess is that the photo was real


Edit but if you know of better ways to detect it such as online tools, please do share

It's simple to postprocess images to 'deep fry' them and make them look older, this also helps disguise the telltale sign of AI. If you look at LaAquilaNegra's post debunking it, you can see the unprocessed version which is much more obviously AI.

 

[Cooper]

The photo itself looks rather old, maybe from the 1990s or early 2000s

Artificially generated photos, generally look way different than that

My guess is that the photo was real


Edit but if you know of better ways to detect it such as online tools, please do share

The photo might well have been photoshopped or AI-generated, but the underlying story of Epstein having trafficked preteen children is 100% real, anyone who argues against this is either a shill or a complete retard.

I strongly suspect that fake images might be circulated and boosted to discredit real stories. as in this case, the notion that Epstein was a child trafficker - strawmen fallacies. And this might be a very good example of that. That picture was the first result in a quick search about "Epstein with boys". That image might even have been a real image that was spiked with fake elements to discredit the whole thing, because I recall seeing such a picture years ago before AI images were a thing.

There is no doubt however that Epstein trafficked children, he for instance had twin 12-yo girls flown over from his french partner Jean-Luc Brunel (suicided in his french jail cell in 2022), and that he has trafficked victims that were even younger.

 

[GodfatherPartTwo]

I strongly suspect that fake images might be circulated and boosted to discredit real stories. as in this case, the notion that Epstein was a child trafficker - strawmen fallacies.

As AI gets smarter and smarter, it is going to become exponentially more difficult to discern real evidence from false evidence. Instead of appealing to logic, objective truth, evidence, people will be forced to appeal to authority, that authority being the powers that be. The implications are terrifying.

 

[Cuchulainn]

Whether or not this image is AI, I generally assume that all pedophiles are equally willing to rape boys as they are to rape girls.. Therefore, I have to assume that this was happening at the Epstein Island in front of many of his powerful and influential guests, the same as it was happen at Diddy parties in front of guests like the Obamas. Justin Bieber was just one of the many passed around as a child at Diddy's place.

Actually, paedophiles do have a gender preference (I dont know about tranny paedos), unless they like really prepubescent ones.
Homosexual paedophilia is actually a thing within the gay "community" (get them young and turn them).
Islamic-style punishements (like stoning) are too gentle for paedos, they should all die in extreme agony.

 

[PurpleUrkel]

I dont have a problem with the main body of your posts other than this one where you've been refuted but you keep digging your heels in.

That's because you're wrong and you keep accusing me of "digging my heels in" when I was right when I said Trump never told his children to: "Never marry a jew (especially one that owns a building numbered 666).

Trump never talked to his children about jews? He never said to Ivanka: "Never marry a jew"... "Especially one that owns a building numbered 666"? Why would this be? Why would such a "powerful," "intelligent" man not indocternate his children with counter-semitism?

So to reiterate, when Ivanka married Kushner in 2009 he owned a building numbered 666. The Kushners bought the 666 building in 2007 and it remained 666 for 15 years until 2022. Do you have trouble reading and comprehending math? The building has only been 660 for 3 years and yet you continue with this asinine logic of "the Kushner's don't own a building numbered 666."

Go ahead, keep defending anonymous jews while mindlessly nitpicking a known brother in Christ

End of "conversation."

 

[Cooper]

^A lot of the pedophiles like the Podestas get their kicks from doing highly transgressive acts. In that sense pedo predation is a step up from homosexuality. That is why homos have very high rates of pedophilia, in fact many homos were themselves victims of pederasty at a young age and end up perpetrating the act.

The same applies to the satanists, who not only practice pedophilia but also extreme violence on children, act seen as the ultimate transgression.

 

[budoslavic]

Give me a hand brother.

Based on my research, I believe the image is not genuine. It's been floating around over the last couple of years based on Tineye Reverse Image Search results.

Below image is floating around as well when I used an image search add-on tool.

Two different online AI Image Detector tools displayed mixed opinions: one said "real" and the other said "fake".

Edit. The reason why I questioned the image is this: how did anyone come in possession of that image? Who obtained or released it? Where did it come from? If it was real, then when was the picture taken?

Edit II. Another thing that nagged me is the boys' faces were not blurred out, which raised a lot of questions.

 

[budoslavic]

The two boys who were circled actually look like their faces were taken from older (in age) movie actors. I don’t know their names but when I have time I’ll find them and post.

Funny you mentioned movie actors. "Lord of the Flies" movie (1990?) came to mind.

 

[eradicator]

Funny you mentioned movie actors. "Lord of the Flies" movie (1990?) came to mind.

Not only that, Balthazar Getty was one of the main child actors in that film, and he is part of a billionaire family, the Getty family, you have probably heard of J.p. Getty and Getty images, and the Getty museums?

I’d be sort of shocked if the getty family didn’t have some sort of dealings with other billionaire cabal