Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
Illinois is thinking about decriminalizing prostitution.
San Fran, New York, Seattle, Portland, also are all cities I would expect it to be legalized in. American Democrats are strange in supporting the sexual degeneracy of LGBT but opposing adult prostitution.I am shocked that Washington DC has not legalized prostitution
It would crash the price of pu**y and your average non Christian man would just pay for it instead or engaging in relationships or hookups with terrible women.San Fran, New York, Seattle, Portland, also are all cities I would expect it to be legalized in. American Democrats are strange in supporting the sexual degeneracy of LGBT but opposing adult prostitution.
This is what I think personally is the reason why feminists/women want it banned. Porn does not provide sex for men which is why it’s allowed despite being degenerate.It would crash the price of pu**y and your average non Christian man would just pay for it instead or engaging in relationships or hookups with terrible women.
Fair enough, before returning to Orthodoxy I would’ve considered it if it were available.I’m actually of two schools of thought on this. OK for devil’s advocate, let’s say we turn all of the big cities into another Amsterdam or Las Vegas with red light districts for drugs and prostitution. People should be free to flush their lives away if they want to on drugs and whores.
The problem with that is this in cities like Amsterdam that have legalized drugs, there’s also a skyrocketing and staggering amount of mental disorder. If you take someone who’s functional at life, and give them access to drugs like methamphetamine, or fentanyl, or heroin, or what not people who have an addictive personality suddenly go from being functional to completely dysfunctional.
Do we want to see a massive spike in addiction to drugs and whores?
Drugs and whores do not need to go together. How many people become homeless due to drugs or gambling vs how many become homeless because of whores? One of these vices is clearly less destructive to men.I’m actually of two schools of thought on this. OK for devil’s advocate, let’s say we turn all of the big cities into another Amsterdam or Las Vegas with red light districts for drugs and prostitution. People should be free to flush their lives away if they want to on drugs and whores.
The problem with that is this in cities like Amsterdam that have legalized drugs, there’s also a skyrocketing and staggering amount of mental disorder. If you take someone who’s functional at life, and give them access to drugs like methamphetamine, or fentanyl, or heroin, or what not people who have an addictive personality suddenly go from being functional to completely dysfunctional.
Do we want to see a massive spike in addiction to drugs and whores?
I’d argue onlyfans is popular precisely because men can’t get prostitutes legally. Men don’t want legal trouble so onlyfans provides a risk free method to get some sort of female interaction (albeit virtual.)Pornography is already mainstream prostitution, just a matter of time before guys move to real girls now that instaslut and onlywhores are so popular.
Drugs and whores do not need to go together. How many people become homeless due to drugs or gambling vs how many become homeless because of whores? One of these vices is clearly less destructive to men.
Portland was a failed example of legalized drugs. Pimps will find drugs illegally since they’re already breaking laws.I’m going with the Amsterdam example .
They just legalize everything. Drugs, whores, whatever..
Should we legalize either of these? Just one?
Is Chicago wrong for looking into legalizing prostitution with red light districts?
As for not separating drugs from prostitution, I’m guessing it’s common for pimps to trade drugs in exchange for sex, or to keep their whores drugged up. I don’t really know that much about it, which is why I’m asking if any of this is actually a good idea?