The Destruction of Modern Women

Click to expand...

This thing about women absorbing DNA from guys is total horseshit.

Additionally, I don't really believe stats about number of partners ruining women either. Maybe there's some correlation, but I don't think it's the cause the way it's presented.

It's optimum if she's a virgin, but after that the number of partners is not the problem if she doesn't lose control and go "boy crazy" as we used to call it.

I've dated both extremes and those in-between and the numbers is not predictive any more than other addictions can be foreseen.

So speaketh Seraphim Thundercock.
 
The video above looks to be an AI creation. Doesn't it?

I know about stem cells from a baby being present for decades in the mother's body, so this seemed plausible to me.

bigthink.com

How a fetus can save its mother's life

During pregnancy, fetuses transfer stem cells to their mothers. These cells persist for years and help mothers heal.
bigthink.com bigthink.com

Can the smug UC Davis people of science be trusted, they agree with RLOS? I think it was Michelangelo who said chaste women look younger, to justify why the Virgin Mary looked to be of the same age as Jesus on his paintings/frescos. Does more men mean worse looks, or ruined psychology?

davissciencesays.ucdavis.edu

Nevertheless, foreign DNA persisted

Having unprotected sex can have legitimate consequences. If you are female, you may get pregnant. And no matter your biological sex, you are at risk for numerous sexual transmitted infections. Both of these risks can be mitigated by use of contraceptives. But, should you fear your partners’ DNA...
davissciencesays.ucdavis.edu davissciencesays.ucdavis.edu
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top