Latest UK Lunacy



UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers​

The British Government recently barred French writer Renaud Camus from entering the UK.

His crime?

Not actual incitement, not violence, not lawbreaking, but a controversial idea.

Camus, originator of the ‘Great Replacement’ theory, was scheduled to speak at a Big Remigration Conference organised by the Homeland Party, as well as at the Oxford Union. His Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) had been approved. Then, abruptly, it was revoked. The Home Office declared that his visit was “not conducive to the public good”.

Meanwhile, Julius Malema, a South African political figure who openly sings “Kill the Boer” at rallies, glorifies racial violence and promotes land expropriation without compensation, was welcomed.

This is not a metaphor. Malema was allowed into the UK in May 2025 to address his supporters in London. The only reason for his delayed arrival was the May Day bank holiday. When he protested, the British High Commission issued a grovelling apology, assuring him the visa holdup was merely bureaucratic, not moral.

The message could not be clearer: ideas from the Right are criminalised, but hate from the Left is indulged.

Toby Young has recently laid this out in detail in his excellent interview on GB News in the wake of the Lucy Connolly appeal decision. His conclusion: the UK no longer defends free speech as a principle, it defends only approved speech. You can chant about killing white farmers, provided your politics check the right boxes. But offer a sociological theory about demographic change? You’re banned.

Let’s be clear: Renaud Camus’s theory is provocative. It raises uncomfortable questions about identity, culture and immigration. One can challenge or reject it. But to silence it entirely, while welcoming actual political violence wrapped in revolutionary chic, is not only hypocritical. It’s dangerous.

A society that punishes ideas but excuses incitement is not protecting its values. It is broadcasting its fear.

Camus, an elderly intellectual with no history of violence, was treated like a threat to national security. Malema, who has stood before crowds chanting genocidal slogans, was treated like a minor celebrity inconvenienced by airport queues. This isn’t policy. It’s ideology masquerading as law.

Once again, the UK has exposed the workings of its two-tier system. British citizens have been arrested for quoting Churchill, misgendering someone online or holding placards in silence. But a foreign politician calling for racial uprising is welcomed, because his fury flows in the approved direction.

Britain used to be a place where you could say what you thought, provided you didn’t call for violence. Now it’s a place where you can call for violence, provided you think what you’re told.

Renaud Camus was banned not because he posed a risk, but because he posed a challenge, a challenge to the dominant narrative. That makes him, in today’s Britain, more dangerous than a man who sings about killing his countrymen.

Malema is in. Camus is out. And that, sadly, tells you everything about who we are now.
Click to expand...

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com
 
Today, Queen Victoria's birthday, was supposed to mark a series of mass UK-wide protests. Organizers are dubbing it the Great British National Strike. Protests/demonstrations were supposed to kick of at noon, local time (7AM EDT) to protest the Starmer government, high cost of living, out of control immigration etc.

www.gbnews.com

Keir Starmer issued stark warning as 500,000 Britons set to walk out in major national protest: 'It's not right wing to be afraid of what's going on'

The protest movement is taking place in all city centres across the country this weekend
www.gbnews.com www.gbnews.com

"Britons have been urged to "unite" against Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in a nationwide protest against the current Labour Government.
The Great British National Strike, taking place this weekend, is set to see more than 500,000 people across the country walking out in protest of the state of the UK.
Speaking to GB News, organiser of the protest Richard Donaldson said he is "not prepared to wait four years" for Starmer to be potentially ousted from power - instead calling for a general election now.
Defending the nature of the strike, Donaldson argued that it is "not right wing to be afraid of what's going on" in Britain."

So far, a basic video search on YouTube, etc. shows a fairly lacklustre turnout, with Leftist counter-protesters traitors seeming to outnumber British patriots.

Anybody here in a major UK city have anything to report?
 
Well, the media is jumping up and down to point out that the arrested driver is white. Whether that's white British, or some other variety, we will just have to wait and see. Intention is clear, but if you're trying to kill people, then that driving is somewhat ineffective. Why not line it up and floor it? He looks like he's drunk or something.
 
Matsufubu said:
Well, the media is jumping up and down to point out that the arrested driver is white. Whether that's white British, or some other variety, we will just have to wait and see. Intention is clear, but if you're trying to kill people, then that driving is somewhat ineffective. Why not line it up and floor it? He looks like he's drunk or something.
Click to expand...

No way. That was intentional.
 
Even if he's a white Brit, it's concerning that this is slowly becoming a European thing. Muslims started it but seem to be ethnic Europeans doing work too.
 
The authorities are in a tricky position. Against usual protocol they immediately released details of the man's ethnicity in order to head off any trouble. The problem they have going forward is that they'll either have to immediately confirm it was a non-native that committed such an incident or they'll have to keep silent - which will be as good as confirming that it was a non-native.

They are however masters at obfuscation. We are accepting at face value their own way of describing ethnicity when we know they are very sly with their word selection. We are assuming that when they say white British that they are talking about a native. The "British" part is all but meaningless as it covers every ethnicity under the sun as long as the individual has British citizenship. And the "white" part is also quite subjective and ambiguous. You have white Balkan Muslims or you have fairly white-looking people from the Levant or Turkey. Even if it was in this case a native man they will without doubt reuse the "white British" term to obscure things in the future. In the case of the Southport killer they tried to obscure things by just stating he was non-Muslim and British. The fact he was a Rwandan with an Al-Qaeda manual in his home was initally withheld (whilst they preached to the public about fake news and misinformation).
 
OrthoSerb said:
The authorities are in a tricky position. Against usual protocol they immediately released details of the man's ethnicity in order to head off any trouble. The problem they have going forward is that they'll either have to immediately confirm it was a non-native that committed such an incident or they'll have to keep silent - which will be as good as confirming that it was a non-native.

They are however masters at obfuscation. We are accepting at face value their own way of describing ethnicity when we know they are very sly with their word selection. We are assuming that when they say white British that they are talking about a native. The "British" part is all but meaningless as it covers every ethnicity under the sun as long as the individual has British citizenship. And the "white" part is also quite subjective and ambiguous. You have white Balkan Muslims or you have fairly white-looking people from the Levant or Turkey. Even if it was in this case a native man they will without doubt reuse the "white British" term to obscure things in the future. In the case of the Southport killer they tried to obscure things by just stating he was non-Muslim and British. The fact he was a Rwandan with an Al-Qaeda manual in his home was initally withheld (whilst they preached to the public about fake news and misinformation).
Click to expand...

Exactly. Release the mug-shot, anything the media says is a lie.
 
I'm not sure if things have changed but they didn't explicitly say that the 53 year old white guy was arrested on suspicion of driving the vehicle. There's a video of the guy driving and closing the door after someone opened it, moments before he ploughed it into the crowd. Dude did not look 53, though it's a pretty grainy video.

Liverpool is a very left wing socialist city. People were almost rejoicing at the news it was a white guy arrested.

There should be more pressure to release the mug shot.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
BBC sure cares about its audience:

www.bbc.com

Placenta: Why some women dey chop am afta childbirth? - BBC News Pidgin

Some pipo believe say di nutrients wey don pass from mama to pikin over months of pregnancy still dey inside di organ and no suppose waste.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com
Click to expand...

This is actually nothing new, for decades the BBC World Service has had broadcasts in degenerate Third World mongrel languages, such as Tok Pisin from Papua New Guinea, island of cannibals...etc, etc, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top