Disney U-turn on Snow White

Nordwand

Other Christian
Heritage
Last edited:
I thought for sure with a name like Zegler that the actress would be jewish but nope, just polish/Colombian
 
Get used to seeing more stuff like that. I know a little bit about the film business and it’s important to understand that releases you see today started production about three years ago. Meaning we are still experiencing the tail end of the 2019 and 2020 wokeness parade. It’s fair to say that the 2025 and 2026 releases will have barely any in-your-face wokeness polluting them.
 
It appears that Disney has delayed the release of the new Snow White movie, in order to "de-woke" it, amd replaced the original little guys with some very traditional looking CGI types:


Nothing like the threat of a thumping box office loss to make people see sense.

Edit to get the CGI acronym correct!

Yeah fellas! My boy John from Disney made one call and got it sorted:



"Men are trash men are trash, slapping myself right now"

Steve Harvey Wow GIF by NBC
 
Speaking of Jewish actresses, one funny thing about the debacle surrounding this movie is that the plot revolves around a character played by Gal Gadot being "jealous of the beauty" of a character played by Rachel Zegler:

View attachment 584

That's what I hate about movies today- the way they twist reality. Case in point: Gal Gadot is much more attractive than Rachel Zegler. I'm sure that's only one thing about the film that would bother me, if I was ever unfortunate enough to see it, if it even gets released.

We're in such a period of cultural decline and decadence, which future historians will hopefully deride.
 
I think they are just rearranging deck chairs on the titanic at this point.
This.

Inasmuch as the woker (yes, even the tweaked version will just be less woke) Snow White being turfed is a backtrack of sorts, this particular incident represents a mere 0.0000000001% of what’s fundamentally wrong with the entertainment industry, both in promoting degeneracy and in dumbing down audiences with bizarre, anti-reality presuppositions like, as someone already mentioned, Gal Gadot being less good-looking than the generic diversity hire.

As hundreds of thousands of young Ukrainian men are slaughtered because their government leaders behind the front lines lack both collective and individual spines, Hollywood (and all other Western national entertainment industries) continues to churn out garbage that puts forward the idea that women are the best fighters, for example.

Someone please call Zelensky and tell him that his best soldiers are mistakenly monkey-branching on Tinder out of Ukraine. Get these women back fast!
 
This.

Inasmuch as the woker (yes, even the tweaked version will just be less woke) Snow White being turfed is a backtrack of sorts, this particular incident represents a mere 0.0000000001% of what’s fundamentally wrong with the entertainment industry, both in promoting degeneracy and in dumbing down audiences with bizarre, anti-reality presuppositions like, as someone already mentioned, Gal Gadot being less good-looking than the generic diversity hire.

As hundreds of thousands of young Ukrainian men are slaughtered because their government leaders behind the front lines lack both collective and individual spines, Hollywood (and all other Western national entertainment industries) continues to churn out garbage that puts forward the idea that women are the best fighters, for example.

Someone please call Zelensky and tell him that his best soldiers are mistakenly monkey-branching on Tinder out of Ukraine. Get these women back fast!

And what a monumental insult to those fighting men. It's just simple disrespect, plain and simple. I can only imagine what they're experiencing now and will be after the war.

The trope of the indestructible "girl next door" emasculates men, it's like psychological castration. Worse still, it's intentional and part of the agenda. "They" hate masculinity, that's why they labeled it "toxic". Its because of their hate that they'll resort to such lows when it comes to their treatment of men. A man's fundamental purpose is to protect and fight for his woman. When you invert this even if its through fantasy, it devastates the psyche and produces the men that are, sadly, prevalent in the West.

Drones, automatons, feeble, weak...but they are these things only because they've been convinced that they are not as good as another person to whom they are clearly superior. Also, they know instinctively that they are stronger, yet, are constantly told otherwise, which creates further conflict and internal discord.

Men are stronger than women, it's obvious to all. But, present-day propaganda is very persuasive. All it takes is to program some CGI and swap out the hero for a heroine and you get the desired situation and, importantly, the desired effects that will emasculate men.

Its an insult to men that are risking their very lives to be told they're not as good as some slut. In fact, its more than an insult, its grotesque. But that's the West for you. When its all said and done, women and their selfish and depraved sexual desires, or their self-image as an unobtainable sexual object, is all that matters. And it is why all those men in Ukraine are currently dying for.
 
audiences with bizarre, anti-reality presuppositions like, as someone already mentioned, Gal Gadot being less good-looking than the generic diversity hire.
Yes Gal Gadot is clearly more attractive than Rachael Zeglar but its not per se because one is mixed race and the other is not. There are some stunning looking mixed race women and some ugly white women. Yes of course different races have differing average levels of attractiveness but that is a population wide thing and means very little on an individual level. And to be fair Rachael Zeglar is not ugly she is just less attractive than Gal Gadot.
 
Yes Gal Gadot is clearly more attractive than Rachael Zeglar but its not per se because one is mixed race and the other is not. There are some stunning looking mixed race women and some ugly white women. Yes of course different races have differing average levels of attractiveness but that is a population wide thing and means very little on an individual level. And to be fair Rachael Zeglar is not ugly she is just less attractive than Gal Gadot.
To me the girl playing Snow White is a great example of a woman where her personality acts as a sort of tie breaker as to whether or not she's attractive. If she were feminine and pleasant and seemed like the kind of girl you'd like to be around she'd come off as attractive. There are women who are pretty enough that you can see it even though they're insufferable or crazy. Angelina Jolie and Christie Brinkley come to mind as far as famous examples, although it happens with non famous women too. On the other hand, Rachel Zegler just isn't physically attractive enough to compensate for her disagreeable personality.
 
Yes Gal Gadot is clearly more attractive than Rachael Zeglar but its not per se because one is mixed race and the other is not. There are some stunning looking mixed race women and some ugly white women. Yes of course different races have differing average levels of attractiveness but that is a population wide thing and means very little on an individual level. And to be fair Rachael Zeglar is not ugly she is just less attractive than Gal Gadot.

Gadot is a 6-7 tops, she is being pushed because she promotes Israel. Zeglar is the protypical obnoxious liberal trust fund JAP at NYU or Oberlin.



GnASMCebMAAOf-1
 
Gadot is a 6-7 tops, she is being pushed because she promotes Israel. Zeglar is the protypical obnoxious liberal trust fund JAP at NYU or Oberlin.



GnASMCebMAAOf-1

Imo, those are just bad photos. The Internet loves to circulate bad photos to prove that an attractive woman is ugly. Circulating one bad photo of Mila Kunis to prove she's actually ugly was a big thing a few years ago, for some reason, for example.

Even the most attractive people can look terrible in a bad picture. Bad lighting, awkward angle and facial expression, lack of makeup, etc.

It applies to men too. I have pictures of myself in my forties after a hard workout where I'm dehydrated and have a pump going and I'm in good lighting, all of which combined makes me look a lot like Brad Pitt in Fight Club. I have pics from the same time where I just look like a typical paunchy middle aged dad.
 
Imo, those are just bad photos. The Internet loves to circulate bad photos to prove that an attractive woman is ugly. Circulating one bad photo of Mila Kunis to prove she's actually ugly was a big thing a few years ago, for some reason, for example.

Even the most attractive people can look terrible in a bad picture. Bad lighting, awkward angle and facial expression, lack of makeup, etc.

It applies to men too. I have pictures of myself in my forties after a hard workout where I'm dehydrated and have a pump going and I'm in good lighting, all of which combined makes me look a lot like Brad Pitt in Fight Club. I have pics from the same time where I just look like a typical paunchy middle aged dad.

By the same token, film stars and celebrities are very conscious of their image and will only be seen in public with their high end makeup and hair jobs. The industry will make sure only the better pictures get circulated.

Very attractive women look good out of bed in the morning, in the shower, or without makeup. Gadot looks kind of meh even dolled up in many of her official pictures.

Gm-ehiIaEAAh7yN

GgpPJAwW4AALn_5


Mila Kunis is a 6, barely. 8-9s look good without makeup. She's another good example of tribal women being pushed on the masses.

Bn-GDHlCcAAUw1w
 
Last edited:
I agree none of these women are top tier beauties. In fact an average 18 year Slavic girl or 18 year old Scandinavian girl or an average 18 year old Albanian girl will look better than 99% of female celebrities.

That being said these celebrity women still look better than a run of the mill Anglosphere woman although that’s not setting the bar very high to be fair.

Also to be fair Mina Kunis is post wall. She is 41 now!! She was notiecably more attractive in her prime 20 years ago (in her prime you could
Argue she was a 6 - 7 depending on your preferences. She is a 5 now.

Out of all of the older female celebrities I think Shakira still looks great.
 
Can you imagine if Greco-Roman or Renaissance art and statuary left behind unsightly and ugly depictions of people?

Society needs standards. The whole Marxian uplift trend we have now is truly unfortunate. Visually disagreeable people are being cast in things to make them or those like them feel better (this is called "representation"). Guess what? Most people don't want to see their ugly mugs, in real life or otherwise. If that makes them feel bad, maybe they can work on not having that bother them? I say this as someone who wouldn't cast himself in anything. People need to know their place. People used to go to the movies to be transported somewhere faraway, romantic, or simply better than what they were used to seeing in their real lives. Now it's like the only thing Hollywood wants people to experience on screen is what it's like to live in the nearest slum.

Of course, some exceptions may be made for those possessing undeniable acting talent, but that is rare. Meryl Streep is one who isn't beautiful (when auditioning for the King Kong role that eventually went to the more attractive Jessica Lange, the film's producer, Italian mogul Dino De Laurentiis, remarked to her that she was too ugly for consideration), although a capable actress, even if somewhat overrated.
 
Rachel Zegler is better looking than Gal Gadot.

Fight me.

In all seriousness, though, Hollywood ran out of ideas so long ago they came up with this one: We'll make the same movie repeatedly, albeit with a different cast. If you don't pay to see it again, it's 'cause you're racist.
 
Back
Top