Okay, we're starting to derail so I'll just say this... You and I are already holding a form of AI super computer in our hands where the AI program on our phones is currently out there deep faking everybody on every subject. You are denying what already exists. And from here we can extrapolate out that (((others))) possess advanced versions of our "smart" phones that are not available to the public in much the same way that a normie can own a single prop engine Cessna but not a Stealth Bomber.There are no AI Super Computers and never will be, because it's impossible.
Maybe, but very few people do. It's not about "understanding" it, it's about being faked out by it to the point where it bends human perception and hence reality, which is already common place.Anybody can download AI code and read it, and run it on their own computer to see how AI works.
Not apparently well enough, because everyday I see someone post a video or image on this forum as news with the qualifier, "Not sure if this is real or not?"It's not some inscrutable mystery. It's just a numerical algorithm. A number of people on the forum already understand this.
I do believe in this notion. It makes perfect sense that being constantly surrounded by modern music, like pop and rap, in addition to watching porn and idolizing celebrities, essentially makes your mind and soul more accessible to demonic forces.After reading much about T.I.'s over the past years, I think that the technology can only do so much and that it's a cover for targeted demonic influence, essentially sorcery.
Believing that technology is capable of discrete control of another's actions against their will is a bit too far. It's close to thinking we're in a simulation and that God is not in control.
The left and mainstream media sure are busy floating the idea that Epstein was a Russian agent. That idea must be gaining traction as I had a normie-ish colleague recently tell me all about this. Is the Epstein topic relatively new for the normie left-ish people? I don't have a great gauge on the shiny objects they follow.



Bannon and Chomsky. Left & Right gatekeepers working closely with Epstein the whole time manipulating American discourse. Distracting the normies away from whatever the target is.
Epstein Bannon DMs. Are these real?
Epsteins offers Bannon his personal properties including his island to use for trysts with a Ms Miller. High Noon and Grace Kelly. Doesn't seem like these were one of his wives?
View attachment 27306
Bannon putting Christianity to gain Epstein's favor?
View attachment 27311View attachment 27312



Bannon and Chomsky. Left & Right gatekeepers working closely with Epstein the whole time manipulating American discourse. Distracting the normies away from whatever the target is.
Epstein Bannon DMs. Are these real?
Epsteins offers Bannon his personal properties including his island to use for trysts with a Ms Miller. Seems like they enjoyed whoever High Noon and Grace Kelly is. Obviously not one of his wives.
View attachment 27306
Bannon putting Christianity down to gain Epstein's favor?
View attachment 27311View attachment 27312
This would explain why Bannon's questions in that 2 hour interview posted upthread are so timid and non-confrontational.
Not sure I agree on the Bannon take. I think he thought he could use Epstein and tied it down to the "getting dirty to get the job done" view point.This would explain why Bannon's questions in that 2 hour interview posted upthread are so timid and non-confrontational.
The left and mainstream media sure are busy floating the idea that Epstein was a Russian agent. That idea must be gaining traction as I had a normie-ish colleague recently tell me all about this. Is the Epstein topic relatively new for the normie left-ish people? I don't have a great gauge on the shiny objects they follow.