LGBT Agenda

Attachments

  • IMG_9436.jpeg
    IMG_9436.jpeg
    554.8 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_9434.jpeg
    IMG_9434.jpeg
    449.1 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_9438.jpeg
    IMG_9438.jpeg
    509 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:
Put them in films and make them the villains.
If only that we’re feasible in Hollywood. Make every homosexual character portrayed on screen some form of deviant, devious, disease-ridden, predatory child rapist. Or selfish, antisocial, malignant narcissists who cause disruption and chaos in any social structure they inhabit, including families, friend groups, schools, the workplace, etc.

To really make it work, in a lot of portrayals the character would need to be initially likable and relatable, like your gay uncle or that lesbian you work with. Someone the audience thinks they can trust and rely on. But that trust would always be broken, called into question, because of course that character would always manifest as some sort of reprobate, planting that seed. Can I really trust these guys?
 
If only that we’re feasible in Hollywood. Make every homosexual character portrayed on screen some form of deviant, devious, disease-ridden, predatory child rapist. Or selfish, antisocial, malignant narcissists who cause disruption and chaos in any social structure they inhabit, including families, friend groups, schools, the workplace, etc.

To really make it work, in a lot of portrayals the character would need to be initially likable and relatable, like your gay uncle or that lesbian you work with. Someone the audience thinks they can trust and rely on. But that trust would always be broken, called into question, because of course that character would always manifest as some sort of reprobate, planting that seed. Can I really trust these guys?
Sounds like a great flick already. It touches on real world issues. It would have to be set in a school. I'm thinking of the Sopranos episode where the girl's soccer coach turns out to be a ped. Something like that but more modern and up to date, like the coach from Scary Movie.
 
To really make it work, in a lot of portrayals the character would need to be initially likable and relatable, like your gay uncle or that lesbian you work with. Someone the audience thinks they can trust and rely on. But that trust would always be broken, called into question, because of course that character would always manifest as some sort of reprobate, planting that seed. Can I really trust these guys?
That's exactly how media was worked to demonize Christians in media. Every time I see a guy who is supposed to be a priest or pastor or devout Christian who is initially depicted as a positive figure I'm already counting down the moments until the big reveal where he turns out he's a hypocrite that beats his wife, is in the closet about his homosexuality or such.
 
That's exactly how media was worked to demonize Christians in media. Every time I see a guy who is supposed to be a priest or pastor or devout Christian who is initially depicted as a positive figure I'm already counting down the moments until the big reveal where he turns out he's a hypocrite that beats his wife, is in the closet about his homosexuality or such.
Correct. The thing is, the depictions I’ve outlined wouldn’t even misrepresent the truth or exaggerate it, it would just put the lifestyle on display without excuses. You could even do a bunch of “based on a true story” involving these people. The double lives of fags would be shown, where by day they present themselves as harmless members of the social environment and victims of bigotry, and then at night they’re going to gay clubs and doing the most depraved things you can imagine.

It would be jarring for an audience to see, for instance, a high school teacher who comes off as just “normal but happens to be gay” grooming one of his favorite freshman students to achieve his “finale” somewhere off campus, all in secret. Then you would have that thing at the end where they show pictures of what the real people look like and where they are now and a blurb in white font on a black background telling the audience about some statistics relevant to the film, or about this string of crimes the character committed and the end result, etc.

One of the things you could do also would be to have gays who are minor characters in a film always talking about their medical problems and ailments in passing to another character. Oh, I can’t make it that day, I have to go get treated again for my [gross] because I came down with another case of [gross] from doing [gross]. Just enjoying life too much I guess!
 
There was a (((film))) that came out a few years ago called Bros. It was about two queers and the studio pushed it heavily. It ended up being a total bomb at the box office. My dad and I had went to go see the Elvis movie and they screened a trailer of this filth that had two men kissing. We were pissed and getting ready to walk out of the theater.
 
Elab. What does that mean and what does plural have to do with trans?

Its in the embed?

He's implying Orthobros and their bad reputation is a Jewish/Edomite/Satanic/Demonic plot. Or that they are bots.

In the Bible, Demons refer to themselves as:"They/ Them/ Us"The plural pronouns are not just grammatical quirks. They hint at a multiplicity of entities inhabiting one vessel & a fragmented identity“Then Jesus asked him, What is your name? And he answered, My name is Legion, for we are many”
 
Back
Top