Destabilization of US Cities: Crime, Homelessness, Liberalism

Bro had bacon and wasn't afraid to use it.

Never forget that these supposedly tough guys just witnessed a two year live-on-air genocide committed on the Ummahs most favored and heralded people and did absolutely nothing .

They respect strength and strength alone and one of my theories is that the average Muslim didn't become enraged with Israel due to atrocities committed in Gaza, that is par for the course in that part of the world, but due to the Ummah looking like a bunch of defenseless and weak pansies as a result of Israeli actions instead.
 
At least when the DA is a Karen. Once again proving that middle-age white women are one of the greatest threats to our country.

View attachment 25561

She brings: "human first approach to the prosecutors office"
View attachment 25565

It has nothing to do with this particular DA. The question is to the lawmakers (in all states) and the entire legal system. If one shoots a fleeing person, especially outside, stuff like entry wound in the back or other evidence, one is going down with manslaughter charges for sure, it is this way in all states and had been this way forever. Not to even mention guaranteed win in a civil suit
The basics to consider if anyone wants to own a gun and use it for self defence.
"This defendant crossed the line by firing outside his home at fleeing persons”
 
Sorry I'm laying down the reality, not the pink rainbow pony fantasies in some heads. If you do not know self defence laws do not use a gun, you will go down for manslaughter which I dk about, your problem, but you will be making it harder fof the rest of the gun owners. Rainbow pony fantasies are different from real life. If you don't know the law: don't own a gun then.
 
Sorry I'm laying down the reality, not the pink rainbow pony fantasies. If you do not know self defence laws do not use a gun, yoy will go down for mamslaughter which I dk about, but you will be makung ut harder fof the rest of the gun owners. Rainbow pony fantasies are different from real life. If you don't know the law don't own a gun then
The DA has discretion to prosecute. Don’t pretend like this is some legal obligation on her part, as if that would even justify prosecuting someone who was minding their own business when a pack of nigs entered his property with intent to do harm. It has not been “this” way since forever, this would not have been the case outside of recent history. It is a malicious prosecution for obvious reasons.
 
Sorry I'm laying down the reality, not the pink rainbow pony fantasies in some heads. If you do not know self defence laws do not use a gun, you will go down for manslaughter which I dk about, your problem, but you will be making it harder fof the rest of the gun owners. Rainbow pony fantasies are different from real life. If you don't know the law: don't own a gun then.

Like @The Penitent Man already said, DAs prosecute at their discretion.
The DA has discretion to prosecute. Don’t pretend like this is some legal obligation on her part, as if that would even justify prosecuting someone who was minding their own business when a pack of nigs entered his property with intent to do harm. It has not been “this” way since forever, this would not have been the case outside of recent history. It is a malicious prosecution for obvious reasons.

And looking at Karen, I'm pretty sure she wouldn't press any charges if those were 2 joggers shooting each other over a banana.
 
Back
Top