Nick Fuentes Thread

Maybe Jews are okay with the antisemitism leaving containment? Thinking 3 steps ahead?

White people haven't really proven to be an immediate threat. Blacks terrorize whites, and there isn't any retribution. Likewise, if all whites think the Jews are bad, will there be retribution or just moaning and groaning?
 
Blade Runner said:
He just shows that the bellwether is changing for speech and that not everything is totally controlled at this point. In fact, as many have stated, there is simply too much on yt and X to even bother with censoring at this point.
Click to expand...
Agree with all of that.

Getting away with Jan 6 involvement is puzzling, this is my first time hearing about it, but a lot of technicalities go into building a case; still no charges at all makes you wonder. You must have your guard up if you associate with him, is he an informant as magoo implies, like in communist Poland or the Stasi moles in East Germany. Lech Walesa was an asset of the government, first recruited by the military intelligence, people in the Solidarity movement knew something back in the 70s.

The internet is a good thing after all. Long ago, curious people knew about Vince Foster, the suicided Clinton associate, now news reach all, and a lot faster, if only by accident though the algos do their jobs.
 
Sandalwood Peak said:
Maybe Jews are okay with the antisemitism leaving containment? Thinking 3 steps ahead?
Click to expand...
If you follow Dixon like I've recommended, you'll see that the powers that be are moving on from Israel and I think that's an explanation of why they don't care as much about the diaspora. The Js will still have a world role but their center or base in the ME as the religious reason for the HQ for bankers/wars is over. Watch, as Gaza is already talked about as being "in peace" and the GCC is also sending its own security forces there. Trump said the other day that other countries were volunteering to do it, alone even. This is a huge turn, and if you are paying attention, it's far too quick which suggests that it's managed by the bigger players. Bibi will be gone and you'll see "peace" in Gaza and with the Palestinian stuff. Normies won't see it, they'll think like Trump or someone else was some grand peace player or adviser. It's all money and what the big boys really want. Israel is old news at this point, for the most part.
 
FrostBITE said:
Click to expand...

It does, no one is the USA cares about these two countries anymore. The popularity of Israel has fallen off a cliff and become poisonous for politicians. Ukraine talk is mostly avoided. Yes, we are still bankrupting our countries supporting them, but this can't be kept up much longer. Resources are dwindling, people are openly hating on Israel at every turn, and no one cares about Ukraine except some extreme weirdo leftist who instantly go quiet when you ask why they support forever war but don't sign up to fight themselves.

Without some major changes, in 5 years Ukraine and Israel will be extremely weak. And by major changes, I mean a complete shift in DC policies, and I don't see that happening.

Nick is wrong here, but Nick isn't the brightest. In fact, this seems more like him poisoning the well of Israel opposition on purpose to say "okay, Israel sucks, but we are stuck with them and stop talking about it, they are just going to win anyway".
 
It_Is_My_Time said:
I don't get it, Nick's and Andrew's point is to see your wife as your wife and not as your best friend and complete equal, so she ends up running the show and runs the family off the cliff, as modern women tend to do.
Click to expand...
The thing is, they are describing this way of dealing with a wife as gay, but a wife is a woman, and gay would mean sex with a man. They are crazy and mixed up to say this.
 
Thomas More said:
The thing is, they are describing this way of dealing with a wife as gay, but a wife is a woman, and gay would mean sex with a man. They are crazy and mixed up to say this.
Click to expand...
Yea, the slang term "gay" is an incorrect term to use, whereas it should more be used as "simp".

I did once hear Nick say he thought men hooking up with random women as being "gay". And after he explained it, it made sense. These men see sex as the highest ideal of life and spend all their time and resources on getting laid, like a gay man would do, rather than seeing women as wives, their partners who help raise their children, and sex as just another by-product of it all. Becoming sex craven/lust is much like being "gay", though extending that mindset and belief on to men who are married seems like a stretch. I agree with you.
 
It_Is_My_Time said:
Yea, the slang term "gay" is an incorrect term to use, whereas it should more be used as "simp".

I did once hear Nick say he thought men hooking up with random women as being "gay". And after he explained it, it made sense. These men see sex as the highest ideal of life and spend all their time and resources on getting laid, like a gay man would do, rather than seeing women as wives, their partners who help raise their children, and sex as just another by-product of it all. Becoming sex craven/lust is much like being "gay", though extending that mindset and belief on to men who are married seems like a stretch. I agree with you.
Click to expand...
I guess I have heard of this idea of making up a new definition for that word, but I think it just causes confusion. Having male-male sex is gay. Two men thinking they are romantically in love is gay. A man being promiscuous with women is not gay, even if gay men are promiscuous with men. Likewise, having trouble maintaining the lead in a relationship with your wife is not like being gay.

Gay is a different category from simping or screwing around.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top