The Barbarian Invasion of Europe

I guess I just see it mocked enough on Twitter that I never think to even turn the TV on. Same stories as always, same angle, same lies and propaganda.

Never on tv or video. Not worth it if it has to be consumed at their pace. I’ll read it since I can skim or skip as I like. I also like skimming the comments on online articles. They’re a great indicator of what ratio of people are buying the message.
 
The comment sections under Euro news articles re Russia or Trump or anything really serious is full of complete NPCs whether gen Z or relic boomers. No positive faith talk ever unless it's about muzzies or the you know whos.

Since India got an Internet connection, rule of thumb should be that any comment with authorship you have not personally verified is left by either a bot aspirant (Indian shill), or an actual bot. Any entity with more cash than moral sense can do this to sway public perception, even tiny corporations made of two dozen nerds.
 
That is because only NPC's and satanic leftists read/watch the non-censored news.

I don't know the breakdown in Europe, I just know that like in the USA, there is a fast-growing White Nationalist movement for men under 25. I also know, in the same generation, there are a lot of spiteful mutant White leftists who seek to destroy themselves and take everyone else down with them.

Also, Europe doesn't have freedom of speech and speaking out could get you put in jail. But as we have seen in Ireland, there are a lot of young White men who are full on White Nationalists.
yes there is mostly no point to write common sense under NPC news sources in those places because they come swarming against it.

I would honestly prefer out in the open satanists ( who would have better aesthetics and style ) to these degenerate communist pride parades and dogs. They are doing the same as the unarmed invader its going right up the edge but not crossing it.

The evil enemy who used to be portrayed as a fierce force to be reckoned with throughout history now in modern society has become lame and gay weirdos in plastic costumes made in china and fat karens and stick figure bald boomers in the bureaucracy driven by pettines and resentment.

A fierce and respected opponent inspires one to also rise up, we have the opposite nobody wants to rise up to meet these lame weaklings they dont inspire resistance they only cause confusion and make you want to look away.
 
Last edited:
yes there is mostly no point to write common sense under NPC news sources in those places because they come swarming against it. I would honestly prefer out in the open satanists ( who would have better aesthetics and style ) to these degenerate communist pride parades and dogs. They are doing the same as the unarmed invader its going right up the edge but not crossing it.

Even the evil enemy in modern society has become lame and gay.
If I had to guess, the White Nationalist movement is larger, in percentage of young men, in Europe than in the USA. But they are much more hidden due to the lack of freedom of speech.

I know we have seen countless videos of people being arrested in Britian for just stating factual crime statistics, I can't imagine what the govt. would do if you posted under a mainstream article that immigration had hurt Europe. They would probably throw your entire family in prison.
 
I know we have seen countless videos of people being arrested in Britian for just stating factual crime statistics
Jesper Langballe (Denmark), Geert Wilders (Netherlands), Marine Le Pen (France), Jussi Halla-aho (Finland) are example of political figures that have been prosecuted for hate speech.
More recently, the female German AFD politician Marie-Thérèse Kaiser (Germany) was prosecuted for quoting government statistics on rape stratified by nationality.
Then you have the countless example of non-political figures across many jurisdictions being prosecuted for anti-immigrant sentiment deemed as hate speech. This happens notably in the UK and Canada.

Curiously enough, when certain politicians or 'thought leaders' in other groups say anti-Christian or anti-European statements, rarely is there prosecution or even condemnation (this is based on the idea that you cannot be racist to Europeans or 'white' people). Even to point this out, could be deemed as hate speech under different legislation in different jurisdictions.
 

These "unarmed invaders" are trivially easy to death with, it's called laws. Normally laws deal with them, the problem is when the people's soul and mind are given over to Satan they then protect these invaders.

Has nothing to do with them being armed or unarmed, it's a spiritual problem at the core. The lack of faith in Christ has doomed the "West."
 
These "unarmed invaders" are trivially easy to death with, it's called laws. Normally laws deal with them, the problem is when the people's soul and mind are given over to Satan they then protect these invaders.

Has nothing to do with them being armed or unarmed, it's a spiritual problem at the core. The lack of faith in Christ has doomed the "West."
Law abiding Indians and Mexicans who outbreed Whites are still invaders. Not all invaders are muslim rapists or cartel gang members. It results in ethnic and cultural replacement, more so with Indians since they’re of a pagan religion but Mexicans still bring a different culture as well.
 
These "unarmed invaders" are trivially easy to death with, it's called laws. Normally laws deal with them, the problem is when the people's soul and mind are given over to Satan they then protect these invaders.

Has nothing to do with them being armed or unarmed, it's a spiritual problem at the core. The lack of faith in Christ has doomed the "West."
This is all true but you want to put the cart infront of the horse, whites where tribes before they where christians. Everything has been dismantled and warped and has to be rebuilt from the ground up. Do you think people can return to christ without having the same frame and mindset that their ancestors had.

This lack thereof is how you get people who are christians only in name but underneath are running on the progressive brainwashed boomer software. Its a christian coat of paint and something that repelled so many youth including myself from the faith.

the right wing is a pipeline towards god and religion. valuing ones culture and people ( which are a christian people and culture ) is a necessary step on the ladder that most need to rekindle first. How can you return to god as a white person unless you first embrace yourself and your own culture and shake off all the shame and judgement of others. All the brainwashing is precisely to keep you away from the christian tradition. denying your heritage and finding god are at odds.
 
Last edited:
It's actually not easy because it's incredibly expensive to live in the US these days due to continued rising inflation.
I'll push back on this a bit. It depends on where you live and how you're living. If you have always lived a bare bones lower middle class life like myself in the US without a lot of frills, bells, and whistles then not much has really changed over the last twenty years in terms of expenses. My monthly food budget has been $600 for at least 10 years now and not much has changed in terms of the quality and amount of food I buy each month. I buy according to weekly sales and use coupons religiously though. It takes time and discipline to do this. The costs on individual items are up quite a bit but I simply work around it. For example, my favorite mayonnaise is now $5+ for a big jar, where as pre-covid it was like $3.75, so what I do now is wait for it to go on a BOGO sale (50% off which becomes $2.50 per jar) and then add a $2 off coupon when you buy 2 which brings my cost down to $1.50 a jar. I buy 10 jars at a time under this paradigm and this keeps me in mayo for 6 months or more. When you buy mayo like this it's less expensive than it was 20 years ago.

Furthermore, gas has been holding steady at around $3 a gallon for at least decade (plus or minus 50 cents). It's been $1000+ for a decade to get a new timing belt and water pump on a 2004 4Runner (actually got it done for $800 last year which was $200 cheaper than in 2019). In addition, my electric bill at my warehouse has been holding steady at $100 minimum/$200 maximum for the last 5 years. My car insurance has been $40 a month for the last decade but it recently went up to $50 a month. My phone bill has been holding steady at $50 a month for the last decade.

Now rent is a bit of a different story, it has definitely doubled over the last decade (thanks to jew owned State Street, Blackrock, and Vanguard buying up 50% of all single family homes each year and jacking rents up), but fortunately I saw the writing on the wall with all of that during RVF 1.0 discussions and bought land when it was cheap(er). However, you can still get rural land in unincorporated counties across the US for $1000 an acre +/- in some really nice places. You just gotta know where to look. For example, I looked at a 200 acre parcel last year for 120K. I also almost bought a dump of a house last year on a 1 acre lot for 32K but the bones were good and I could have got it in good living condition for 20K+ in less than a month.

*In before all the "Yeah Buts"... True stories that are not up for debate.
 
It's actually not easy because it's incredibly expensive to live in the US these days due to continued rising inflation.

That's why I said comparatively easy. Inflation is high almost everywhere. Tax level in the US is relatively low compared to western-Europe still, as far as I can see. Health insurance costs probably offsets it quite a bit though?
Grok breakdown below of a hypothetical single man making 50K/year and with 30K invested in dividend stocks. Illustrates just how much harder it is over here;

Here’s a shorter comparison of tax levels relative to cost of living for a single man earning $50,000 with $30,000 in dividend stocks in the US versus Norway.

Assumptions
  • US: $50,000 salary + $1,500 dividends
  • Norway: 500,000 NOK salary (~$55,000) + 13,500 NOK dividends
  • Cost of Living: Norway’s is 41% higher than the US

United States
  • Total Income: $51,500
  • Taxes: ~$9,027 (federal, state, dividends)
  • After-Tax: $42,473
  • Purchasing Power: $42,473

Norway
  • Total Income: 513,500 NOK
  • Taxes: ~124,485 NOK (income tax, surtax, dividends)
  • After-Tax: 389,015 NOK (~$43,224)
  • Purchasing Power: $43,224 ÷ 1.41 = $30,655 (US terms)

Comparison
  • US: 17.5% effective tax rate, $42,473 purchasing power
  • Norway: 24.2% effective tax rate, $30,655 purchasing power
The US offers lower taxes and better purchasing power than Norway due to its lower cost of living and tax burden.
 
That's why I said comparatively easy. Inflation is high almost everywhere. Tax level in the US is relatively low compared to western-Europe still, as far as I can see. Health insurance costs probably offsets it quite a bit though?
Grok breakdown below of a hypothetical single man making 50K/year and with 30K invested in dividend stocks. Illustrates just how much harder it is over here;

Here’s a shorter comparison of tax levels relative to cost of living for a single man earning $50,000 with $30,000 in dividend stocks in the US versus Norway.

Assumptions
  • US: $50,000 salary + $1,500 dividends
  • Norway: 500,000 NOK salary (~$55,000) + 13,500 NOK dividends
  • Cost of Living: Norway’s is 41% higher than the US

United States
  • Total Income: $51,500
  • Taxes: ~$9,027 (federal, state, dividends)
  • After-Tax: $42,473
  • Purchasing Power: $42,473

Norway
  • Total Income: 513,500 NOK
  • Taxes: ~124,485 NOK (income tax, surtax, dividends)
  • After-Tax: 389,015 NOK (~$43,224)
  • Purchasing Power: $43,224 ÷ 1.41 = $30,655 (US terms)

Comparison
  • US: 17.5% effective tax rate, $42,473 purchasing power
  • Norway: 24.2% effective tax rate, $30,655 purchasing power
The US offers lower taxes and better purchasing power than Norway due to its lower cost of living and tax burden.
The comparison is flawed because median incomes are higher in Norway. The American guy earning $50,000 USD doing a job in USA would likely earn $65,000 USD doing the same job in Norway. Plus a lot of Americans have students loans whereas most Norwegians don't because public universities are free in Norway. And that's not even talking about the healthcare situation either.
 
The comparison is flawed because median incomes are higher in Norway. The American guy earning $50,000 USD doing a job in USA would likely earn $65,000 USD doing the same job in Norway. Plus a lot of Americans have students loans whereas most Norwegians don't because public universities are free in Norway. And that's not even talking about the healthcare situation either.

Even when you adjust for that the net purchasing power it's still higher in the US. I did mention health costs though. I would say that if you are a high earner/investor it's easier in the US. But harder if you are lower down the system. Grok summary again;

Median Individual Income (2025)
  • United States: The median individual income is approximately $40,000 per year (based on 2023 data adjusted for inflation and trends). This reflects earnings for full-time workers, with men slightly higher (~$45,000) than women.
  • Norway: The median individual income is approximately 510,000 NOK (~$47,222 USD at 10.8 NOK/USD, updated exchange rate). This is based on 2023 data of ~47,000 NOK monthly, adjusted slightly for 2025 trends.
Notes
  • These figures are pre-tax and not PPP-adjusted. Norway’s higher cost of living (41% above the US) means the purchasing power of $47,222 in Norway is closer to $33,419 in US terms ($47,222 ÷ 1.41).
  • The US median individual income is lower than Norway’s in nominal terms, but the lower cost of living preserves more purchasing power.
 
Even when you adjust for that the net purchasing power it's still higher in the US. I did mention health costs though. I would say that if you are a high earner/investor it's easier in the US. But harder if you are lower down the system. Grok summary again;

Median Individual Income (2025)
  • United States: The median individual income is approximately $40,000 per year (based on 2023 data adjusted for inflation and trends). This reflects earnings for full-time workers, with men slightly higher (~$45,000) than women.
  • Norway: The median individual income is approximately 510,000 NOK (~$47,222 USD at 10.8 NOK/USD, updated exchange rate). This is based on 2023 data of ~47,000 NOK monthly, adjusted slightly for 2025 trends.
Notes
  • These figures are pre-tax and not PPP-adjusted. Norway’s higher cost of living (41% above the US) means the purchasing power of $47,222 in Norway is closer to $33,419 in US terms ($47,222 ÷ 1.41).
  • The US median individual income is lower than Norway’s in nominal terms, but the lower cost of living preserves more purchasing power.
Sure life in Norway might be more expensive but also its not an apples to apples comparison because quality is not the same. Eat at a fast food joint or low end restaurant in Norway and the food is probably much higher quality than USA due to the stricter regulations. Public transport in Norway is better in many places so you can get by without a car, etc.
 
Been thinking about this, and I suggest that the point of no return is the point where you have a higher number of non-white births than native white births in a country! With first-gen migrants, you can justify sending them back, removing benefits etc. But if they're born in your country, they are citizens, and it's very difficult to argue for sending them back. This is now "their country" people will say.

I asked Grok-Deepsearch to do an estimate based on current data. Top 10 Euro countries that are headed for minority white native births the soonest. In no particular order. I think it's fairly accurate. We don't have a lot of time is the conclusion. TFR = Total Fertility Rate.

Country2025 Population (M)White Share (2025)Foreign-Born % (2023)White TFR (Est.)Non-White TFR (Est.)Non-White Births % (2023)Immigration (Non-White, Annual)Timeline (Minority)
United Kingdom67.781% (~54.8M)9.0%~1.4~2.031.8% (192,500/605,479)~210,000 (70% of 300,000)2050–2060
Germany83.880.1% (~67.1M)19.6%~1.5~2.027.75% (192,319/692,989)~240,000 (60% of 400,000)2060–2070
France65.688% (~57.7M)13.5%~1.61~2.225% (160,000/640,000)~120,000 (60% of 200,000)2060–2070
Spain48.282.5% (~39.7M)17.5%~1.4~2.030% (96,200/320,656)~200,000 (60% of 333,000)2060–2070
Italy59.091.1% (~53.7M)10.5%~1.2~2.025% (94,750/379,000)~90,000 (60% of 150,000)2060–2070
Netherlands18.085% (~15.3M)13.3%~1.5~2.025% (41,000/164,000)~60,000 (60% of 100,000)2055–2060
Belgium11.782% (~9.6M)16.2%~1.4~2.125% (27,500/110,000)~35,000 (70% of 50,000)2050–2060
Sweden10.682% (~8.7M)19.1%~1.3~2.025% (25,000/100,000)~48,000 (80% of 60,000)2050–2060
Switzerland9.074.1% (~6.7M)25.9%~1.5~2.030% (24,000/80,000)~60,000 (60% of 100,000)2050–2060
Austria9.181.2% (~7.4M)18.8%~1.4~2.125% (20,000/80,000)~40,000 (70% of 57,000)2050–2060
 
Europe is so cooked. They started with a much higher percentage of Whites but they will actually fall before America. Pretty incredible speed of decline.

So much for "muh Whites." So many White backstabbers, a suicidal race because they lost their faith in Christ.
 
Been thinking about this, and I suggest that the point of no return is the point where you have a higher number of non-white births than native white births in a country! With first-gen migrants, you can justify sending them back, removing benefits etc. But if they're born in your country, they are citizens, and it's very difficult to argue for sending them back. This is now "their country" people will say.

I asked Grok-Deepsearch to do an estimate based on current data. Top 10 Euro countries that are headed for minority white native births the soonest. In no particular order. I think it's fairly accurate. We don't have a lot of time is the conclusion. TFR = Total Fertility Rate.

Country2025 Population (M)White Share (2025)Foreign-Born % (2023)White TFR (Est.)Non-White TFR (Est.)Non-White Births % (2023)Immigration (Non-White, Annual)Timeline (Minority)
United Kingdom67.781% (~54.8M)9.0%~1.4~2.031.8% (192,500/605,479)~210,000 (70% of 300,000)2050–2060
Germany83.880.1% (~67.1M)19.6%~1.5~2.027.75% (192,319/692,989)~240,000 (60% of 400,000)2060–2070
France65.688% (~57.7M)13.5%~1.61~2.225% (160,000/640,000)~120,000 (60% of 200,000)2060–2070
Spain48.282.5% (~39.7M)17.5%~1.4~2.030% (96,200/320,656)~200,000 (60% of 333,000)2060–2070
Italy59.091.1% (~53.7M)10.5%~1.2~2.025% (94,750/379,000)~90,000 (60% of 150,000)2060–2070
Netherlands18.085% (~15.3M)13.3%~1.5~2.025% (41,000/164,000)~60,000 (60% of 100,000)2055–2060
Belgium11.782% (~9.6M)16.2%~1.4~2.125% (27,500/110,000)~35,000 (70% of 50,000)2050–2060
Sweden10.682% (~8.7M)19.1%~1.3~2.025% (25,000/100,000)~48,000 (80% of 60,000)2050–2060
Switzerland9.074.1% (~6.7M)25.9%~1.5~2.030% (24,000/80,000)~60,000 (60% of 100,000)2050–2060
Austria9.181.2% (~7.4M)18.8%~1.4~2.125% (20,000/80,000)~40,000 (70% of 57,000)2050–2060

Those are all western European countries, have you got the same table for eastern Europe?

Btw Switzerland, didn't expect that
 
Back
Top