Donald Trump

easy_c said:
Ironically, I survived a week in Mumbai fine and then got violently ill ordering Uber Eats from my layover in LA
Click to expand...

One week isn't one and half months my bro. I was good for my first week. They say good things take time but i'm not exactly sure.
Mumbai is a good boiler room. That must have been a real interesting week with an extreme environment. I've only ever spent a day there.
 
Kiwi said:
One week isn't one and half months my bro. I was good for my first week. They say good things take time but i'm not exactly sure.
Mumbai is a good boiler room. That must have been a real interesting week with an extreme environment. I've only ever spent a day there.
Click to expand...
I spent a week there once about 20 years ago watching the cricket. Didn't get sick once from the food but we were eating in nice places. The food was really good but I was crazy about curry back then.

Some of the boys went for some street food I side the stadium and they got really really sick.
 
SkiPro said:
I spent a week there once about 20 years ago watching the cricket. Didn't get sick once from the food but we were eating in nice places. The food was really good but I was crazy about curry back then.

Some of the boys went for some street food I side the stadium and they got really really sick.
Click to expand...

A week there watching Cricket would actually be a good time i'd imagine. I think i'd like to explore the city. It must have been very differnet 20 years ago!

Generally speaking, as long as you stick to the popular street food you're okay - they don't tend to survive as a business making their customers sick. But then it comes down to bacteria, immune system etc for westerners and their clean diet. Like I said, I definitely got incredibly sick there, but i'd still go back to Northern India / Nepal region to visit one day, God willing.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
View attachment 19607
Click to expand...

This is great, and I believe it. But when are people going to be arrested, prosecuted, and put in jail? It just seems like there is all this crime around us with a common (((denominator))), Epstein, JFK, the Steele Dossier, illegal Jan. 6 arrests, DOGE fraud, rigged 2020 election, Biden being too senile to be the real President, etc., yet nobody is being charged with anything. You can't continue to speak about fraud and waste in our govetnment without naming names and arresting people. Or is it not going to happen because there will be too many Bergs and Steins with dual citizenship listed on the warrants?
 
PurpleUrkel said:
You can't continue to speak about fraud and waste in our govetnment without naming names and arresting people. Or is it not going to happen because there will be too many Bergs and Steins with dual citizenship listed on the warrants?
Click to expand...

That's how it works when you are playing both sides at the same time. Maybe they'll go after a few mid-level working class bureaucrats who were just taking orders from above.

Same as in the financial crash in 2008. The people one the top who were responsible walked away with billions (if not trillions) of dollars, while the SEC filed charges against a few lowly bank clerks.
 
PurpleUrkel said:
This is great, and I believe it. But when are people going to be arrested, prosecuted, and put in jail? It just seems like there is all this crime around us with a common (((denominator))), Epstein, JFK, the Steele Dossier, illegal Jan. 6 arrests, DOGE fraud, rigged 2020 election, Biden being too senile to be the real President, etc., yet nobody is being charged with anything. You can't continue to speak about fraud and waste in our govetnment without naming names and arresting people. Or is it not going to happen because there will be too many Bergs and Steins with dual citizenship listed on the warrants?
Click to expand...

How are we to make arrests when criminals are being elected to the government through fraudulent elections? The fact that no arrests occur show how many criminals are currently running the government.

Going after fraudulent elections is the most important 1st step towards cleaning up the government.
 
eradicator said:
No. Not without repealing the 22nd amendment (Fdr was elected to 4 terms and died in office, we got the 22nd amendment after that which limits presidents to 2 terms )
Click to expand...

Prohibition banning alcohol in the USA in the 1920s was introduced with a constitutional amendment in 1919, and was repealed circa 14 years later via another constitutional amendment in 1933. So anythings possible provided you can get enough senators (and states) to back it.
 
Last edited:
Caduceus said:
Prohibition banning alcohol in the USA in the 1920s was introduced with a constitutional amendment in 1919, and was repealed circa 14 years later via another constitutional amendment in 1933. So anythings possible provided you can get enough senators (and states) to back it.
Click to expand...
Repealing the 22nd amendment is indeed possible, but I think it's unlikely, even if Trump gets the necessary 2/3s of both houses in 2026. I think even Trump supporters would hesitate to break precedent for the sake of keeping Trump in.

Also, Trump will be really old in 2028. I really can't imagine him being President until he is 86. I agree it would be better for Vance to win in 2028, assuming he continues the way he's been doing so far.
 
Caduceus said:
.


Shower water pressure now restored


Click to expand...

I've had a few chances to use a high flow shower head and they were very memorable. One was actually 30 years ago at a campground with a shower building, and the shower was high flow. It's like a whole other experience, enough so that I remember it decades later!

I can't wait to be able to buy one and install it at my house!
 
Thomas More said:
I've had a few chances to use a high flow shower head and they were very memorable. One was actually 30 years ago at a campground with a shower building, and the shower was high flow. It's like a whole other experience, enough so that I remember it decades later!

I can't wait to be able to buy one and install it at my house!
Click to expand...

Haha I get it!

The shower head in my basement bathroom almost hurts it hits so hard it's like a massage, it came with the house....I refuse to change it out I've even resealed it before. The one I have upstairs is newer and it sucks even though I have crazy water pressure in the house, and that's after going through a few different ones to find the one that sucked the least.
 
FrancisK said:
The one I have upstairs is newer and it sucks even though I have crazy water pressure in the house, and that's after going through a few different ones to find the one that sucked the least.
Click to expand...

If it's not a super high end shower head maybe you can disconnect the hose and see whether the head's flow restrictor can be removed with needle nose pliers- there will be some small and large o-rings that may need to be taken out with a sturdy pin, I used and broke a few toothpicks, or a tiny screwdriver, to get a better hold of the culprit.

I was burning through the Aquasource shower hoses from Lowes every 6 to 10 mos, they come with a lifetime warranty, however not every CS manager will do a one time swap, sometimes he'll refer you to the product maker and the hassle isn't worth it. The backpressure woud cause them to leak, and after I realized what was going on, my current hose has now survived for more than 5 yrs. You can do the same with faucet aerators, even removing the o-rings alone makes a noticeable difference.

In this example the hose comes with it preinstalled, looks flat here, you'll probably have a truncated cone:

https://bostingner.com/blogs/news/how-to-remove-a-flow-restrictor-to-increase-shower-water-pressure

There are youtube videos.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top