Interestly that scene has never escaped my memory, the music, the atmosphere, insane...Man, you just need to watch the costume party in the movie Eyes Wide Shut, and it’ll tell you everything you need to know about Hollywood….and you know what? It’s probably just as filthy bro
Interestly that scene has never escaped my memory, the music, the atmosphere, insane...
Menendez brother vibes. Maybe Meathead was diddling his son.
Here’s fellow Jew Al Frankin “joking” about Reiner being passed around and raped by his father and his father’s homosexual Hollywood friends when he was a kid.Menendez brother vibes. Maybe Meathead was diddling his son.
Here’s fellow Jew Al Frankin “joking” about Reiner being passed around and raped by his fathers Hollywood friends when he was a kid.
That's a vicious thing to say publicly in a so-called roast. I wouldn't be surprised if this were true. This kind of thing was very widespread. He would have been in his teens in the early 60's, but Hollywood was already perverted then.
I read a thing once where Shirley Temple went to meet a studio executive when she was 12, and he was naked and showing his dick. She laughed at him nervously and finally got out of there.
She told her mom afterwards, and her mom said another studio exec had propositioned her while Shirley was being molested. That's typical Hollywood, even in the old days.
Here’s fellow Jew Al Frankin “joking” about Reiner being passed around and raped by his father and his father’s homosexual Hollywood friends when he was a kid.
Reminds me of the Rotchschild Ball that they for some reason let a photographer take pictures from.
View attachment 27036
![]()
25 Bizarre Photos From The 1972 Rothschild Surrealist Ball
Audrey Hepburn attended the party with a bird cage on her head, while other guests dressed as Magritte paintings.allthatsinteresting.com
Yes.Well in the end they do like to show off, in their sick way.
Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut had a lot more to give but was cut out for "reasons" after he had a "heart attack" and died.
Let's say he is a captured asset and not "one of them". Why would all his films contain subliminal (and not so subliminal) messages? Even if one cannot recognise the deeper layers, the very act of watching a horror film leaves scars on the soul. Why would he produce sick films like the Shining, or Space Odyssey, if not to scar and demoralize his audience?Yes.
And we know Kubrick was captured as an asset.
The current version is sadistic enough. Can't imagine what's in the real Directors Cut.
I disagree. These films often serve as predictive programming or exposure.Let's say he is a captured asset and not "one of them". Why would all his films contain subliminal (and not so subliminal) messages? Even if one cannot recognise the deeper layers, the very act of watching a horror film leaves scars on the soul. Why would he produce sick films like the Shining, or Space Odyssey, if not to scar and demoralize his audience?
As for Eyes Wide Shut*, he stated that Cruise (a scientologist, aka "one of them") and Kidman (a witch, look up her father) got the better of him and steered the film where they wanted. Even if we believe him as a victim, the prior question remains.
* The clue is in the title: pretends to reveal, but in reality it hides.
Let's say he is a captured asset and not "one of them". Why would all his films contain subliminal (and not so subliminal) messages? Even if one cannot recognise the deeper layers, the very act of watching a horror film leaves scars on the soul. Why would he produce sick films like the Shining, or Space Odyssey, if not to scar and demoralize his audience?
As for Eyes Wide Shut*, he stated that Cruise (a scientologist, aka "one of them") and Kidman (a witch, look up her father) got the better of him and steered the film where they wanted. Even if we believe him as a victim, the prior question remains.
* The clue is in the title: pretends to reveal, but in reality it hides.
The characters know exactly what they are getting into (pdf), that's why they leave their daughter unattended in the last scene, to be escorted outside the store by two strangers. It's the audience that the title refers to. Anyway, this is the wrong topic for this discussion.I always thought the title represented the ignorance of the masses.
All the clues are there but they're not willing to see it, like the Tom Cruise character.
The characters know exactly what they are getting into (pdf), that's why they leave their daughter unattended in the last scene, to be escorted outside the store by two strangers. It's the audience that the title refers to. Anyway, this is the wrong topic for this discussion.
I believe it's a meta narrative or just an internet rumor, but it's difficult to ascertain what is true and what isn't with these types. They like to misdirect, partly reveal, partly hide. Movie directors can be thought of as magicians, wielding soft magic not producing fireballs from their staff, but casting charm spells through images and sound on the brains of the audience.You're right, I haven't seen the film for years but now you mentioned it the last scene was disturbing.
If Kubrick wasn't trying to expose these satanic elites then why did they cut 40mins from the film after he had a case of the sudden heartattack?