Hollywood Is Run Like A Satanic Cult

Menendez brother vibes. Maybe Meathead was diddling his son.
Here’s fellow Jew Al Frankin “joking” about Reiner being passed around and raped by his father and his father’s homosexual Hollywood friends when he was a kid.



 
Last edited:
Here’s fellow Jew Al Frankin “joking” about Reiner being passed around and raped by his fathers Hollywood friends when he was a kid.




That's a vicious thing to say publicly in a so-called roast. I wouldn't be surprised if this were true. This kind of thing was very widespread. He would have been in his teens in the early 60's, but Hollywood was already perverted then.

I read a thing once where Shirley Temple went to meet a studio executive when she was 12, and he was naked and showing his dick. She laughed at him nervously and finally got out of there.

She told her mom afterwards, and her mom said another studio exec had propositioned her while Shirley was being molested. That's typical Hollywood, even in the old days.
 
That's a vicious thing to say publicly in a so-called roast. I wouldn't be surprised if this were true. This kind of thing was very widespread. He would have been in his teens in the early 60's, but Hollywood was already perverted then.

I read a thing once where Shirley Temple went to meet a studio executive when she was 12, and he was naked and showing his dick. She laughed at him nervously and finally got out of there.

She told her mom afterwards, and her mom said another studio exec had propositioned her while Shirley was being molested. That's typical Hollywood, even in the old days.
 
Here’s fellow Jew Al Frankin “joking” about Reiner being passed around and raped by his father and his father’s homosexual Hollywood friends when he was a kid.




More “jokes” about diddling kids.



I bet Reiner’s kid comes up with a “Menendez Brothers” defense, that he was diddled by Rob. Whether it’s true or not, his lawyers can use these clips.
 
Reminds me of the Rotchschild Ball that they for some reason let a photographer take pictures from.

View attachment 27036


Well in the end they do like to show off, in their sick way.

Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut had a lot more to give but was cut out for "reasons" after he had a "heart attack" and died.
 
Yes.

And we know Kubrick was captured as an asset.

The current version is sadistic enough. Can't imagine what's in the real Directors Cut.
Let's say he is a captured asset and not "one of them". Why would all his films contain subliminal (and not so subliminal) messages? Even if one cannot recognise the deeper layers, the very act of watching a horror film leaves scars on the soul. Why would he produce sick films like the Shining, or Space Odyssey, if not to scar and demoralize his audience?

As for Eyes Wide Shut*, he stated that Cruise (a scientologist, aka "one of them") and Kidman (a witch, look up her father) got the better of him and steered the film where they wanted. Even if we believe him as a victim, the prior question remains.

* The clue is in the title: pretends to reveal, but in reality it hides.
 
Let's say he is a captured asset and not "one of them". Why would all his films contain subliminal (and not so subliminal) messages? Even if one cannot recognise the deeper layers, the very act of watching a horror film leaves scars on the soul. Why would he produce sick films like the Shining, or Space Odyssey, if not to scar and demoralize his audience?

As for Eyes Wide Shut*, he stated that Cruise (a scientologist, aka "one of them") and Kidman (a witch, look up her father) got the better of him and steered the film where they wanted. Even if we believe him as a victim, the prior question remains.

* The clue is in the title: pretends to reveal, but in reality it hides.
I disagree. These films often serve as predictive programming or exposure.

I like a lot of horror films actually.

Not nihilist ones like Rob zombie movies.... But of the supernatural ones.
 
Let's say he is a captured asset and not "one of them". Why would all his films contain subliminal (and not so subliminal) messages? Even if one cannot recognise the deeper layers, the very act of watching a horror film leaves scars on the soul. Why would he produce sick films like the Shining, or Space Odyssey, if not to scar and demoralize his audience?

As for Eyes Wide Shut*, he stated that Cruise (a scientologist, aka "one of them") and Kidman (a witch, look up her father) got the better of him and steered the film where they wanted. Even if we believe him as a victim, the prior question remains.

* The clue is in the title: pretends to reveal, but in reality it hides.

I always thought the title represented the ignorance of the masses.

All the clues are there but they're not willing to see it, like the Tom Cruise character.
 
I always thought the title represented the ignorance of the masses.

All the clues are there but they're not willing to see it, like the Tom Cruise character.
The characters know exactly what they are getting into (pdf), that's why they leave their daughter unattended in the last scene, to be escorted outside the store by two strangers. It's the audience that the title refers to. Anyway, this is the wrong topic for this discussion.
 
The characters know exactly what they are getting into (pdf), that's why they leave their daughter unattended in the last scene, to be escorted outside the store by two strangers. It's the audience that the title refers to. Anyway, this is the wrong topic for this discussion.

You're right, I haven't seen the film for years but now you mentioned it the last scene was disturbing.

If Kubrick wasn't trying to expose these satanic elites then why did they cut 40mins from the film after he had a case of the sudden heartattack?
 
You're right, I haven't seen the film for years but now you mentioned it the last scene was disturbing.

If Kubrick wasn't trying to expose these satanic elites then why did they cut 40mins from the film after he had a case of the sudden heartattack?
I believe it's a meta narrative or just an internet rumor, but it's difficult to ascertain what is true and what isn't with these types. They like to misdirect, partly reveal, partly hide. Movie directors can be thought of as magicians, wielding soft magic not producing fireballs from their staff, but casting charm spells through images and sound on the brains of the audience.

There is no verifiable accounts that support the theory of "the studio cut 40 mins". By all accounts, the final version was considered by Kubrick as finished. What they did cut was some explicit nudeness during the orgy scene to retain PG-13 status.

My point is, Kubrick was one of the best magicians in Hellywood, he can't be seriously considered as a whistleblower. He was "one of them".
His last screenplay was "AI", which Stephen Spielstein ( a fan of Kubrick) took and made it a movie.
 
Back
Top